- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 22,003
- Location
- KTTA, North Carolina
- Display Name
- Who you kiddin?
- Home Airfield
- KTTA
I think I'm on some sort of fence about this. I think taxi announcements can be overblown. The one that gets me is when the ramp is empty of moving aircraft. Exactly who are you warning? Where's the potential conflict?I was just going to write that. I’m at a busy training field with 2 schools & one runway, yet they yammer on about their taxiing intentions. I blame their instructors who mostly came out big name pilot mills who are headed to the “bigs.”
OTOH, there's one I always do. This is our runway. When 21 is in use, there's a real potential for a conflict between aircraft taxiing from the ramp to 21 and aircraft turning off the runway at the 2nd taxiway. So at least there's someone for whom the information may be helpful.
Blame pilot mills? Nah/ The worst offenders at my airport are definitely not from pilot mills. I think it's more about teaching standardized processes, but leaving out the judgment piece. Yammering tends to be a personal trait.

That's my first place (after nonsensical phrases like "last call"). When I do instrument recurrent training, it often becomes a debrief topic. Personally, mostly because there is so much of it at my airport, I like a short combo. Something like "10 miles south; straight in Runway 3. Practice instrument approach" is concise, understandable to the student pilot soloing, is an undetailed explanation for the long straight for the pattern police, and might be informative to that other airplane doing the same thing.2nd place goes to IFR training flights announcing on the radio to a full vfr pattern that they’re at the IFR fix dodad & their intended route is on the “RNAV to what ever,” as if that information had any meaning to the rest of us. “15 miles south of the airport at 2000 inbound,” is all we need

