All traffic in the area, please advise

Not exactly, this is only true for non accelerated frames, if you’re accelerating (including up, down or turning) you can’t claim your stationary. In special relativity, the twins paradox illustrates that.
Well, unless I do some serious drag reduction on my old biplane I don't think I have to worry about what happens at relativistic speeds... ;)

I do tend to use north up sometimes when I'm maneuvering (accelerating) near my destination and track up when flying straight and level enroute. But that's also because it's easier to read text on the chart when it's north up.
 
Well, unless I do some serious drag reduction on my old biplane I don't think I have to worry about what happens at relativistic speeds... ;)

I do tend to use north up sometimes when I'm maneuvering (accelerating) near my destination and track up when flying straight and level enroute. But that's also because it's easier to read text on the chart when it's north up.

Another good reason to fly north up.

But can you give me a reason why you prefer track up?
 
Another good reason to fly north up.

But can you give me a reason why you prefer track up?
One situation where I find track up useful is flying an instrument procedure. Whether I'm on departure, en route, or approach, when I'm flying the correct heading the course line will appear vertical on the moving-map display. It also makes it immediately obvious which way to turn when a turn point is reached.
 
Another good reason to fly north up.

But can you give me a reason why you prefer track up?
This is assuming you're flying with an old paper chart. A large majority using ForeFlight I believe only use the Aeronautical Layer, I know I do.

*NO* issues with reading the text when heading South as it is ALWAYS the correct orientation.

As for why Track Up, even IFR on a visual I've been told to report some lake or some structure that I have no clue about. Twr will come back at your 2 o'clock, 5 miles (or whatever). If I still don't see it I just GLANCE at my EFB and odds are I'll pick it out. No metal (or physical) games of turning the chart around. Look to my 2 o'clock on the chart and there it is.

I get the concept of North up for big picture planning. But sorry, for all those that say North up is better for 99% of flight ops.... You're just kicking and screaming to hold onto the old paper way. But even then... I had an EXCEPTIONAL CFI many decades ago and he told me to just leave the chart on my lap so I could read things quickly if I knew where I was. But if there was EVER a time I was unclear, turn the chart so that what I saw out the window matched what I saw on the chart and go from there. With EFBs, it's just st... It's just letting your pride get in the way because that's the way we "always" did it.
 
But can you give me a reason why you prefer track up?
What I see on the screen matches what I see out the window, with no mental conversion required.
This is assuming you're flying with an old paper chart. A large majority using ForeFlight I believe only use the Aeronautical Layer, I know I do.

*NO* issues with reading the text when heading South as it is ALWAYS the correct orientation.
I use Avare, which only has a chart layer, so text is right side up only in north up view. But I'd rather deal with reading text upside down or switch to north up a couple of times per flight, and have the screen match the real world view all the rest of the time.
... I had an EXCEPTIONAL CFI many decades ago and he told me to just leave the chart on my lap so I could read things quickly if I knew where I was. But if there was EVER a time I was unclear, turn the chart so that what I saw out the window matched what I saw on the chart and go from there.
My CFI (1976) advised turning the chart on my lap to match the flight direction. "Track up", 1976 style.
 
Amateurs, all of you. The real debate is between magnetic north up and heading up.
 
are we allowed to talk about zoom?
No! If you say his name three more times he's going to start posting on PoA! :mad2: :loco: :hairraise::eek:o_O

Obviously there's something wrong with you. With me too. I did track up with paper sectionals, north up with paper low enroute. I do track up with the 430, 650, and IFD 440. North up with with 530, 750, IFD 5x0, and G1000. If there’s any consistency, I think it might be small screen vs big screen, but with EFBs im pretty much north up whether tablet or phone.
Whoa... If I were going to do it by device, I'd do track up on the bigger screens and north up on the smaller (wide) screens, simply because at least when you're going east and west you'd see further ahead that way.

This is assuming you're flying with an old paper chart. A large majority using ForeFlight I believe only use the Aeronautical Layer, I know I do.
I don't know about that. I use the Aeronautical layer on top of the sectional.

As for why Track Up, even IFR on a visual I've been told to report some lake or some structure that I have no clue about.
But... Those are on the sectional.
 
I have to confess struggling with the same thing - when you're in the middle of an approach, the distance to the end of the runway requires adding several numbers together, whilst yet managing all the other aspects of an instrument approach (because the magic magenta-line box only tells you the distance to the next waypoint). Takes a little more brain capacity than may be available (from some of us). One of the issues with those 'practice approaches' on VFR days.
Best I can usually do is a rough estimate (which is usually 'good enough').

It has never been a problem for me. Just look at the DME readout.

Track up, north up? I fly north up. Seems about right to me. I've recently changed the GPS in my car to track up. Something new, I may or may not change it back.

Oh, and the argument between "over" and "out". What I was taught in 1972 was that "over" means I am finished transmitting and I expect a reply and "out" means I am finished transmitting and do not expect a reply. "Over and out" is contradictory and should never be said.
 
Last edited:
It has never been a problem for me. Just look at the DME readout.
That only works if there's a DME in the right places, one of which is your airplane. ;)

Oh, and the argument between "over" and "out". What I was taught in 1972 was that "over" means I am finished transmitting and I expect a reply and "out" means I am finished transmitting and do not expect a reply. "Over and out" is contradictory and should never be said.
Kinda like "Roger, Wilco." Wilco implies Roger. "Over and out" and "Roger Wilco" are only for movies.
 
This is assuming you're flying with an old paper chart. A large majority using ForeFlight I believe only use the Aeronautical Layer, I know I do.
I don't know about that. I use the Aeronautical layer on top of the sectional.
Must be another one of his inviolate rules of the only proper usage :D
 
Years ago I was on frequency with a Mooney (I swear given the background noise it was an M10 with the window open). The pilot's answer to every ATC call was "There ya go."
 
In my early days in the Coast Guard I was always a Track/Head Up guy. When I was stationed on an 87' vessel our Master Chief was strongly in favor of North Up. He would always take the watch after me and would loudly give an annoyed sigh as he switched the radar back to his preference. Then, many years later when I was on one of our larger 210' cutters I learned to appreciate North Up. I saw many junior officers get confused when trying to decipher a navigation rules situation in Head Up. Nowadays, I prefer North Up...even in my car's maps and Apple/Google maps.
When I was a senior instructor at USAF Nav Training in the 80s, I would sometimes get tasked with checking out new instructors fresh from operational units. I always could tell the WSOs from the heavy aircraft Navs because the WSOs always flew track up operationally and the checkout missions in the sim were exclusively North Up. If the sim was flying on any heading more than 30 degrees of North, the WSO would crane his neck to align his forehead with the track. As a WSO myself, I remembered wondering why my neck was sore after a long sim mission.
 
I did a lot of navigating all over the world in my Army career, including completing an obscure course euphemistically named Advanced Land Nav (IYKYK). First step was ALWAYS to orient your map, which is the paper map equivalent of track up.
 
A similar thing gives a lot of new R/C model pilots trouble... when the plane is headed towards you right and left are reversed. Some get used to it quickly, others don't. You'd see some new guys turning away from the plane and looking back over their shoulder at it, especially for landing.
 
A similar thing gives a lot of new R/C model pilots trouble... when the plane is headed towards you right and left are reversed. Some get used to it quickly, others don't. You'd see some new guys turning away from the plane and looking back over their shoulder at it, especially for landing.
My one experience with that, I took the stick right when I should’ve gone left. Realized what was happening, and just rolled it all the way through to the bank angle I wanted.

More of a “froze on the stick” thing than anything else, probably, but the guy whose airplane I was flying was impressed. ;)
 
A similar thing gives a lot of new R/C model pilots trouble... when the plane is headed towards you right and left are reversed. Some get used to it quickly, others don't. You'd see some new guys turning away from the plane and looking back over their shoulder at it, especially for landing.
We had a guy, pretty good sized fellow, take a different approach. In his own words when the foam model came at him at about 4 mph he "threw the radio at the plane and screamed like a little girl". Hilarious to everyone except the guy that owned the radio.
 
Some guys "fly the transmitter", tilting it in whichever direction they want the plane to go. It's funny to watch them do a loop...
 
Physics teaches up that no frame of reference is special, so it's just as valid to consider the airplane stationary and the earth moving under it. And even the Earth is moving around the Sun, and the Sun is moving around galaxy, and...
Makes it seem so insignificant. So, can we have your liver?

Edit- Finally, someone gets my esoteric reference....thanks @Piperonca

and for the rest of you blokes....

 
Last edited:
If you are using a map (EFB, glass panel, etc) it should be north up, because the earth (surface) is not moving, you are. If no map (traffic display, etc) then it should be track up.
Except that North up does NOT work for high speed, low level flight.
 
Except that North up does NOT work for high speed, low level flight.
It does not work for ANY flight where terrain association is used for navigation.

The reason for track up is simple: so that terrain features appear on the map the same way they appear to the pilot.
 
It does not work for ANY flight where terrain association is used for navigation.

The reason for track up is simple: so that terrain features appear on the map the same way they appear to the pilot.
Exactly
 
It does not work for ANY flight where terrain association is used for navigation.

The reason for track up is simple: so that terrain features appear on the map the same way they appear to the pilot.

well, if the airplane is slow enough, it's not that hard to mentally rotate things... plenty of time to see things if flying track up in a cherokee 140. PLENTY of time. :-)
 
well, if the airplane is slow enough, it's not that hard to mentally rotate things... plenty of time to see things if flying track up in a cherokee 140. PLENTY of time. :-)
But when you're down low, your field of view is much smaller and the apparent speed is much faster. Navigating by pilotage at 1000' AGL or lower is very different from doing it at 5000' or more. By the time you see something on the ground and reconcile its position and orientation on the map, it may already be out of sight behind you.
 
well, if the airplane is slow enough, it's not that hard to mentally rotate things...
But why???? That's the thing I have never understood. We're constantly taught to stay ahead of the aircraft, do things is a simple consistent process, Keep It Simple S***... and you were probably taught in Primary Training for your Private TO ROTATE THE SECTIONAL. Yet people think they're macho because they can "mental figure things out."
(Not really picking on you, but you did mentioned it. :))
 
But when you're down low, your field of view is much smaller and the apparent speed is much faster. Navigating by pilotage at 1000' AGL or lower is very different from doing it at 5000' or more. By the time you see something on the ground and reconcile its position and orientation on the map, it may already be out of sight behind you.
I’ve never had a problem with a north-up sectional below 1000 AGL. But my brain thinks in north-south-east-west more than left-right.
 
don't get me wrong, I've probably used track up most of the time even in my superfast (not) cherokee 140. (the 140 is very hard to get behind).
 
Back
Top