Thinking ahead - Panel Upgrades

Not even close, parts-wise.
G5 AI lists for $2950 and HSI with GPS interface for $3950. $2950+$3950=$6900.

AV30C is 2x $2300 + $700 (HSI) + $600 (autopilot) +$300 (magnetometer) = $6200.

Less than 1AMU seems like the same neighborhood to me.

Edit: Garmin is offering a special promo on a bundle kit for $5400.
 
Last edited:
are you selling those two radios?
Keeping the GNC 355 to add to a new GTN 650xi. But will eventually be selling the PAR 200B. March begins the panel work, so May might be done? A bit of time in the future.
 
On the audio panel discussion, I’ve posted more details in other threads but I struggled to choose between the GMA 350, GMA 35c, and PMA 450B. I went with the 450B primarily because of the single button to swap between the isolation modes. The Garmin panels would have made it more work to change who was on the intercom with me. The second Bluetooth channel was also a nice feature, so I can listen to an audiobook while the passengers listen to music, for example.

Rewiring the plane for stereo audio has more benefits than just music. Spatially separated Comm1 and Comm2 is more useful than it sounds. You can actually understand the ATIS broadcast coming in at your 2 o’clock while subconsciously monitoring for your call sign coming from Center at your 11 o’clock, or however you set yours up.
 
Last edited:
Update: Went and spent an hour with my 12 year old daughter keeping notes of our "experiments".

GREAT NEWS: got the intercom, all the various headsets,and comm 1 (the old Garmin GPS300) working crystal clear. Better than I've ever heard them. Did a radio check from inside the hangar to ground and we were having perfect, old school landline quality voice communications.

Other news: comm 2 (Terra 760D) is dead. I pulled the breaker on it and everything else in the panel is perfect.

So, either put a yellow tag one in of the exact same radio (around $500-$1000) and fly on, or use this chance to pull it and the TN200 VOR (they are installed as a pair in a weird bracket) and put in a GNC215 (about $4,700 plus unknown amount to install).

Good news that we're not grounded anymore, as comm 1 is crystal clear now and there are no anomalies. Comm 2 is disabled and placarded as INOP until I get either a replacement unit or upgrade.

Germain to this, do we really even need VORs anymore or would I be fine to just put a GTR205 for like $2700 and remove both Terra radio nav/coms?

I think the smartest short term thing is to slide a working 760D in, but it's throw away money when I eventually upgrade other components.
 
Congrats on solving the audio problem! I just chimed in to agree with folks that I'd keep that Stec, too. I've only flown two planes with APs, and the stec one I just loved. Really simple, smooth, easy to use.

I didn't follow all of the flow here, and it's always easy to spend someone else's money, but if it were mine I'd be fine with one little IFR capable Garmin GPS in the radio stack that could be couple to the stec, and a VOR. And if it were easy, subbing out the vacuum AI for a little round electric one so you could lose the vacuum pump AND have a more reliable setup overall. But that's just me. It is a nice looking panel.
 
Germain to this, do we really even need VORs anymore or would I be fine to just put a GTR205 for like $2700 and remove both Terra radio nav/coms?

ILS capability is possibly more useful than the VOR reception capability.
Five years ago I would've told you to ditch the VOR receiver. Now, with GPS jamming and spoofing becoming more credible threats, I'd recommend keeping the capability.

Maybe- presumably you are thinking of ifr enroute and approach modes as being especially critical?

There's a bit of chicken and egg without having an instrument rating. The value of the hardware you are asking about is, to me, fairly marginal as a vfr tool, and I'd be just as likely to recommend a standby handheld over spending extra money on new equipment to replace it. (insert debate about voice over VOR here I suppose?)

But you aren't really going to be able to train for an instrument rating with what remains in the plane, and then go on to to practically use the setup as-is, either.
 
Five years ago I would've told you to ditch the VOR receiver. Now, with GPS jamming and spoofing becoming more credible threats, I'd recommend keeping the capability.
Honest question, how often is GPS jamming unanounced vs announced? Announced I can just not travel that day (I travel for pleasure only), unannounced would leave me hangin'. I do fly with an IPAD air that also get GLONASS signals if there was unforecasted GPS jamming that I could use in an emergency (in the soup when GPS gets jammed).
 
ILS capability is possibly more useful than the VOR reception capability.


Maybe- presumably you are thinking of ifr enroute and approach modes as being especially critical?

There's a bit of chicken and egg without having an instrument rating. The value of the hardware you are asking about is, to me, fairly marginal as a vfr tool, and I'd be just as likely to recommend a standby handheld over spending extra money on new equipment to replace it. (insert debate about voice over VOR here I suppose?)

But you aren't really going to be able to train for an instrument rating with what remains in the plane, and then go on to to practically use the setup as-is, either.
Hmm, good thinking. I can rule out the idea of a handheld. I feel like $300-400 for a handheld vs replacing the 760D for $500 seems like having the 760d is worth it.

I'm still waffling, waiting to hear what my installer thinks about level of effort to put int he 215 and get it all hooked up. I might be best served to put the 760D in now, continue flying and then do a panel upgrade before starting instrument, so I can train, test, and fly on the setup I actually want for IFR.
 
Maybe- presumably you are thinking of ifr enroute and approach modes as being especially critical?
Even VFR navigation can benefit from a working VOR receiver. Great way to restore situational awareness if there's a short between the headphones.
Let's face it, a lot of us have gotten addicted to the magenta line and we're not as good as we should be at dead reckoning anymore. Especially true if outside of our local area. And the airspace is a bit more complex as well, a lot easier to bust a restricted area or a class B than it was 50 years ago.
Honest question, how often is GPS jamming unanounced vs announced?
The problem is you can't prove a negative. The DoD thinks there's a perceived threat somewhere in your area and turns off the civilian portion of the GPS signal. They might also actively jam Glonass/Galileo at that point.
Or some foreign adversary decides to do sonething stupid and plants 20 suitcase jammers around the JFK/DC airspace, denying GPS service in most of the northeast. That won't be announced.

I always make sure I have a valid VOR signal tuned in, and use it to cross-check my GPS position. I've flown in parts of the world where GPS would go out suddenly, or tell you a position that was definitely not right. It was nice having an inertial navigation system as a back-up.
 
I might be best served to put the 760D in now, continue flying and then do a panel upgrade before starting instrument, so I can train, test, and fly on the setup I actually want for IFR.
Not sure it makes sense to pay to put something in when you’ll then be taking it out. The Garmin Nav/ Com radio is going to be part of whatever you have for IFR training.

Get it and enjoy it now.
 
Last edited:
If the replacement is akin to slide out/in and 1 hour of labor or better yet some supervision and logbook sign off, going back to the 760D seems like a smart interim play.

It's value doesn't go to 0 when it's removed later, if a person is willing to fuss with re-selling the mess of old stuff.

When the sunspots come out to play, are they making en route pretty messed up? Or is it mostly just degrading WAAS approaches? I somehow avoided all that this past summer.
 
If the replacement is akin to slide out/in and 1 hour of labor or better yet some supervision and logbook sign off, going back to the 760D seems like a smart interim play.

It's value doesn't go to 0 when it's removed later, if a person is willing to fuss with re-selling the mess of old stuff.

When the sunspots come out to play, are they making en route pretty messed up? Or is it mostly just degrading WAAS approaches? I somehow avoided all that this past summer.
I am leaning that way if I can just do that and then take my time to plan the panel out for a year or two from now.
 
Update: Went and spent an hour with my 12 year old daughter keeping notes of our "experiments".

GREAT NEWS: got the intercom, all the various headsets,and comm 1 (the old Garmin GPS300) working crystal clear. Better than I've ever heard them. Did a radio check from inside the hangar to ground and we were having perfect, old school landline quality voice communications.

Other news: comm 2 (Terra 760D) is dead. I pulled the breaker on it and everything else in the panel is perfect.

So, either put a yellow tag one in of the exact same radio (around $500-$1000) and fly on, or use this chance to pull it and the TN200 VOR (they are installed as a pair in a weird bracket) and put in a GNC215 (about $4,700 plus unknown amount to install).

Good news that we're not grounded anymore, as comm 1 is crystal clear now and there are no anomalies. Comm 2 is disabled and placarded as INOP until I get either a replacement unit or upgrade.

Germain to this, do we really even need VORs anymore or would I be fine to just put a GTR205 for like $2700 and remove both Terra radio nav/coms?

I think the smartest short term thing is to slide a working 760D in, but it's throw away money when I eventually upgrade other components.
Was it the comm 2 causing the issue?
 
Was it the comm 2 causing the issue?
Yes, the Terra 760D radio (seperate nav works fine). I pulled the breaker and all the issues are gone. I bought a yellow tagged identical replacement and we'll slide that in and see if the problem is gone (that will confirm if it's the radio unit (hoping) or wiring to it.

I hope it's the radio unit as the yellow tag one was cheap and the install/log is cheap. I can even sell the old one for a few bucks for parts as the display was great, just some internal circuitry failure
 
Yes, the Terra 760D radio (seperate nav works fine). I pulled the breaker and all the issues are gone. I bought a yellow tagged identical replacement and we'll slide that in and see if the problem is gone (that will confirm if it's the radio unit (hoping) or wiring to it.

I hope it's the radio unit as the yellow tag one was cheap and the install/log is cheap. I can even sell the old one for a few bucks for parts as the display was great, just some internal circuitry failure
OK, sharing some updates on this journey. Swapped in a new radio and same symptoms. To refresh everyone

Failing DG
INOP comm 2 (even after swapping slide in radio as a test).
25 year old radios/GPS

Looking at the costs for the G5/GI275, wondering if one of these would be best:

Option 1: Go all Garmin
GTN 650 14k
G3X Touch (10 and 7") 30k
G500AP 7k
GNX375 8500
GTR 205 2200
Comm panel 2,500

Looks like a little over 60 in HW plus install.

OPtion 2: Hybrid
Used IFD 540 (10K)
Skyview (10, 7) + engine monitor, VHF radio and ADSB in/out (23k)
Keep STEC 50
GTR 225 (5K)
Comm panel 2,500

33k plus install

Tweaks you'd make to these configs?

Option 3 is "on the cheap"
IFD 540 (10k)
2x G5 (7k)
GNX 375 (8500)
Comm panel (2,500)
GTR 205 (2k)

Looks like 31K. Makes no sense to me vs the above.

The more I look at it, the more OPtion 2 makes sense.

I am VERY open to tweaks or alternative ways to do option 2, swapping out radios and panels. I have the following default preferences, but am open to ideas

1. I don't like Garmin's flow in their GNX and G1000 navigators. It just doesn't work with my brain
2. I also don't like their audio panel logic. whatever they're doing is always counter intuitive to how my brain works. Yes, I can memorize things, but it increases workload
3. I don't like the skysensor ADSB. It drops out all the time and is a PITA. I am a huge fan of the Garmin 345 ADSB solution, and would guess the Garmin 375 is similar rock solid reliability. I am open to the Dynon ADSB in/out, but concerned if it's as good and "lights on" as the Garmin one after the disappointment in the uAvionics stuff.

GOALS:
ROCK SOLID, crystal clear comms
Better SA. easier to find airports/etc
Lower pilot workload, easier to use
Cost/time vs resale
 
  • Like
Reactions: cdb
I don't understand why com 2 doesn't work after you switched radios and still had the problem. Maybe over simplistic, but other than a physical location, and radio just needs three things: power, antenna, output audio. If you switch the radio and there's still a problem, then it's one of those three things, which should be REALLY easy to diagnose. I'd do that before I did anything else, and if you had a shop switch the radio and they didn't quickly and automatically find out whatever the problem was after the radio was swapped, I'd find another shop to do the avionics work. Perhaps I'm being too harsh...but this should be simple stuff.

Once you get that unknown out of the way and have someone in the loop that can troubleshoot things, I like option 2. And that is a nice looking panel.
 
I don't understand why com 2 doesn't work after you switched radios and still had the problem. Maybe over simplistic, but other than a physical location, and radio just needs three things: power, antenna, output audio. If you switch the radio and there's still a problem, then it's one of those three things, which should be REALLY easy to diagnose. I'd do that before I did anything else, and if you had a shop switch the radio and they didn't quickly and automatically find out whatever the problem was after the radio was swapped, I'd find another shop to do the avionics work. Perhaps I'm being too harsh...but this should be simple stuff.

Once you get that unknown out of the way and have someone in the loop that can troubleshoot things, I like option 2. And that is a nice looking panel.

My ia and I swapped it in the tray to test.

How much time, at 150/hr would you put into troubleshooting 26 year old radios, honestly?

There is an option to replace DG for say 2k plus fix the wires for say a grand, which is the cheapest route but it’s throw away money towards making things better. It is an option though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Do you really need 2 glass panels?

And don’t know where you got those prices, but no way is G3X 10 and 7 panels are 30 in parts alone…maybe that includes installation?

A single G3X is less than $12k. GTN 650 Xi is also 12k. You can get the whole Garmin suite with 2 10” panels for $44k in parts, minus rebates and it’s $40k if you pull the trigger before end of year.
 
Last edited:
That rules out any Garmin, as the GTN 650xi, GNC 355, and GPS 175 all have similar menus.
Thanks. I haven't had a chance to see/interact with one in person. Appreciate the insight. I can get around my GNC300xl, which is sort of similar, but i'm only doing basics with VFR navigation and VHF radio tuning with it.
 
Let me backtrack a bit. Suggest you download the GTN xi simulator app for your I phone and take a spin to double check you’re thinking of the current Garmin layout. It’s free to get and use.
 
For your option 2, I suggest you study the IFD interface vs. the GTN interface and decide which one you like better. Each has its fans. And you'll probably be happy with either once it's in the plane.

Comments on your option 1:

My RV-14 has G3X Touch 10" PFD and 10" MFD with engine monitor, GTN 650 Xi, GFC 500-equivalent, G5 with backup battery, remote audio panel, remote transponder, and remote Comm2. If I were doing it over, there is only one thing I'd change: drop the 10" MFD and replace the 650 Xi with a 750 Xi. For IFR, I have to do the flight plan and navigation with the GTN so I need it close at hand. The MFD is too far away to really be useful. And the 750 is more useful than the 650 as an MFD, especially because it can show 4 data fields while on the map page plus up to (I think) 6 at all times, depending on whether you have a remote audio panel and/or remote transponder.

Do you have an engine monitor in that plan?

Do you have a backup instrument planned into it or will you retain some steam gauges for backup?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WDD
My ia and I swapped it in the tray to test.

How much time, at 150/hr would you put into troubleshooting 26 year old radios, honestly?

There is an option to replace DG for say 2k plus fix the wires for say a grand, which is the cheapest route but it’s throw away money towards making things better. It is an option though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're right, I wouldn't spend much time trying to troubleshoot old radios. But I think I would the antenna and wiring, because that's going to be critical to whatever you have going forward. If the coax/connectors or antenna are bad, they're going to need to be done no matter what, and if you get them either tested good or replaced then you might find you don't have a problem with the com2 radio at all. Just my 2 cents.

I probably won't make friends with this one, because I'm speaking in an area (aircraft avionics) where I don't have any experience, but the coax from the antenna should have a connector on it that connects directly to the radio, and same with the power cable. If there's a tray system that's connecting power and/or RF through push in connectors held in place by the tray being slid into its holder, like you might do with a 1970's pickup truck and a CB radio, then I'd bet dinner that that piece of coyote/roadrunner engineering is your problem, even if it came like that from the factory. A tray system should provide mechanical, not electrical, connectivity. To do otherwise is to add parts and complexity which absolutely reduces overall system reliability. Sorry for the rant... I just don't want to see someone toss out a X hundred dollar radio for a problem with a 25 cent connector built into a 20 year old tray.
 
Do you really need 2 glass panels?

And don’t know where you got those prices, but no way is G3X 10 and 7 panels are 30 in parts alone…maybe that includes installation?

A single G3X is less than $12k. GTN 650 Xi is also 12k. You can get the whole Garmin suite with 2 10” panels for $44k in parts, minus rebates and it’s $40k if you pull the trigger before end of year.
Hi,

Like anyone, I do not "need" them. :) But I did want to consolidate the engine monitor into it as well (just to remove another old instrument), so I thought I might need two panels and the price to add the second panel is really small from what I can tell (in both Dynon and Garmin ecosystems). It seemed like a lot of the costs were all the wiring and stuff and adding a second screen was fairly minimal extra costs, but I've not verified.

I am guessing on some of the prices. I have my hometown FBO that will work up a Dynon quote, but I have to hunt up an avionics shop to do the Garmin stuff (beyond the G5s, which anyone can get).

I suppose a "temp fix" could be

Fix wiring issue, hope it's not Hardware ($800)?
Replace DG with a single G5 or
Use the dual kit to replace the AI, DG and the vacuum system
K10-00280-41Kit, G5 Dual Bundle$5,395 (MAP)
+ 2,000 ish for install.

That would keep all the old radios but have everything working for less than $10k and give me a minor "glass" upgrade while fixing my issues. My only hesitation is that this is all throway money if I do a larger upgrade down the road
 
I can get around my GNC300xl, which is sort of similar,
I just looked up what a GNC 300XL is. I'll double my suggestion for your consideration to download the GTNxi simulator app and take a spin.

Also - help me get a little smarter if possible. What are your goals with this? Keeping the plane for while/ this could be your last plane? Make it IFR capable for the future?

BONUS: I'm Garmin oriented, Garmin biased. My first PPL lesson was in a plane with a GNS, and after that all my rentals were with a GTN. I was "brought up" with Garmin, so it all makes sense to me.

After giving the GTN simulator a spin, you might very well still like Dynon better; all good.

BTW, my other bias to Garmin is how well it's scalable, you don't loose anything if you add other units. They all play well together. For example, right now I have among other things two GI 275s. If I get a G3X in the future the GI 275's will slide over and be the back up. The GI 275's will integrate with the G3X, but will also drive the autopilot. If one G275 goes off line I have the second GI 275 that kicks in. And both have a battery back up if I loose power, loose the entire panel. Just another aspect for you to consider.
 
Last edited:
For your option 2, I suggest you study the IFD interface vs. the GTN interface and decide which one you like better. Each has its fans. And you'll probably be happy with either once it's in the plane.

Comments on your option 1:

My RV-14 has G3X Touch 10" PFD and 10" MFD with engine monitor, GTN 650 Xi, GFC 500-equivalent, G5 with backup battery, remote audio panel, remote transponder, and remote Comm2. If I were doing it over, there is only one thing I'd change: drop the 10" MFD and replace the 650 Xi with a 750 Xi. For IFR, I have to do the flight plan and navigation with the GTN so I need it close at hand. The MFD is too far away to really be useful. And the 750 is more useful than the 650 as an MFD, especially because it can show 4 data fields while on the map page plus up to (I think) 6 at all times, depending on whether you have a remote audio panel and/or remote transponder.

Do you have an engine monitor in that plan?

Do you have a backup instrument planned into it or will you retain some steam gauges for backup?
Thanks, yes, they all require either a G5 (Garmin) or the D30 (Dynon). To further understand your point, you would eliminate the second screen entirely? Would you get the engine instrument stuff on the PFD then displayed all the time, or paginate from the moving map to that?
 
I just looked up what a GNC 300XL is. I'll double my suggestion for your consideration to download the GTN app and take a spin.

Also - help me get a little smarter if possible. What are your goals with this? Keeping the plane for while/ this could be your last plane? Make it IFR capable for the future?
Thanks WDD.

Disclaimer, I'm only using the GNC for VFR navigation and talking on the radio, not for any IFR stuff.

I am a VFR pilot, I originally thought this plane was "temporary", but I'm kind of in love, so I could see potentially keeping it a long time as it's fast, fun to fly, and has a new motor and prop, so there's an argument to be made to just accept the limited useful load, keep wax on the 1951 paint and enjoy the plane.

Goals:
No BS with radios. They should be crystal, crystal clear, easy to use and dead nuts reliable.
Increased VFR situational awareness, I want a big moving map and Garmin pilot isn't doing some things I want. I would like a highway in the sky and to be able to visualize VFR and IFR approaches.
No BS ADSB in. I leverage the weather and traffic features on every flight, current solution sucks and keeps dropping offline (skysensor) so I'd like to landfill it and get something that turns on and gives me traffic and weather the whole flight 100% of the time.
While I'm not IFR rated today, if I'm going to start doing things to the panel, I would want to make the aircraft truly IFR capable (especially GPS approaches and en-route). I'm undecided on keeping the non GPS navigation capabilities.
Replace lazy/drifting DG with non-failing DG function for when I get vectored in controlled airspace and don't have to remember all the compass corrections in real time when I'm busy and harried.

Basically, make flying easier and less stressful. The plane itself is great, the issues above are burdensome.
 
You're ahead of the game in that you've got some well thought out objectives.

You noted you like the "highway in the sky" visual that say a G3X PFD would give you. So IF the Garmin menu system is acceptable, maybe....

1) Garmin G3X PFD
2) Garmin Transponder (ADSB In and out)
3) How is your audio panel? If ancient, get a PS Engineering PAR 200 B, which give you a new audio panel as well a new Com 2

4) Garmin GTN 650 xi.

This will give you two Coms, one Nav radio, and one modern GPS navigator AND the large PFD you like. This would be scalable to add an engine monitoring system that would display on the G3X.

NOTE: I REALLY like @iamtheari 's idea of stretching and getting a GTN750xi vs the GTN650xi. That would be an amazing panel.
 
Thanks, yes, they all require either a G5 (Garmin) or the D30 (Dynon). To further understand your point, you would eliminate the second screen entirely? Would you get the engine instrument stuff on the PFD then displayed all the time, or paginate from the moving map to that?
I really do need to make my long-threatened video discussing my thoughts on panel design and avionics selection.

In the RV, I started out with the EIS strip on the edge of my copilot-side 10" MFD. When I was designing the panel for another plane, I experimented in the RV by moving the EIS strip to the edge of the pilot-side 10" PFD. It has remained there ever since. On the G3X Touch, you can tap the EIS strip and it brings up the Engine MFD page (splitting the screen if it was not already split). The Back hard key then takes you back to where you were (different MFD page or non-split screen, if I remember right). I really like having the EIS on the PFD, and that other plane ended up without a separate MFD display.

Note that, if you put the EIS strip on an MFD-configured display, you can still show the Engine page on the 10" PFD in split-screen mode. It's just that you can't get to it with a simple tap on the strip. If your plan is to put the EIS on a 7" MFD, where will that MFD be in your panel?

I don't know if you can omit the EIS MFD in a certified G3X Touch install. If you can't, then my advice is mostly irrelevant. But I would still recommend giving serious consideration to where each thing ends up in your panel. My copilot-side 10" MFD is mostly dead weight and dollars I could have used elsewhere (including covering most of the difference to get a GTN 750 instead of the 650 I have).

The next question is how often I even use the split-screen moving map display on the PFD. The answer is ... often, but only because I have a 650 instead of a 750 and the copilot-side 10" MFD is too far away. If I had a 750 in the center stack where the 650 currently is, I think I would almost never use the map page on the PFD. I'd just keep the 750 on the map page and mostly use the split-screen PFD for the Engine, Weather, Traffic, and Checklist pages.

Bear in mind that there are many different opinions about which compromises are worth making, and I installed a yaw damper in my side-by-side two-seater RV for the sole reason that it would drive me even crazier than I am if I had a YD button on the GFC 500 controller that didn't do anything, so my priorities are famously weird.
 
Now wait a minute. This is the plane you bought after asking us for "a cheap way to build retract time" wasn't it? :rofl:

Let me throw a couple of suggestions out there. If you still want that Twin Bonanza sometime in the next decade, you probably don't want to be dropping big money on a panel right now. OTOH, if you've decided the Bo is gonna stay, then you probably wan't something nice.

First off: I wouldn't bother with an IFD navigator. Their main advantage is that they're slide-in replacements for the Garmin GNS series. You won't be able to get that advantage, so IMO you're better off sticking with Garmin. You mention not liking the flow in "the GNX and G1000" - I'm going to assume you meant GNS and G1000, as they're pretty much identical in how they work. Good news: You can't get a G1000 in your plane, and nobody in their right mind would be recommending GNS series navigators now, they were discontinued 14 years ago! The Garmin GTN and all of their modern stuff works in a completely different way - Just a main menu with icons instead of the GNS/G1000 groups and pages.

For the "go all out" version, I'd do this:

* G3X Touch 10" with EIS - Putting in a 7" on the other side would be optional, more on that in a moment.
* GTN: You could get a 750Xi and use it kind of like an MFD, or you could get a 650Xi and the 7" MFD. Or a 750Xi and the 7" MFD if you really like lots of big color screens and hate money like I do. ;)
* GFC 500 autopilot with pitch trim and yaw damper. Your pax will thank you for the yaw damper - Beeches are happy airplanes, they love to wag their tails!
* GTX345 transponder. If you really want a backup GPS, you could do the GNX375, or you could get a GNC355 as your second Com radio.
* GTR205 #2 com radio
* GMA350c audio panel if you want to talk to the plane, or PS Engineering PMA450B otherwise.

Now, to accomplish all of your goals while also at least attempting to not have the panel be worth more than the rest of the plane and maintaining the classic look:

* GI 275 AI: This gives you primary instrument capability for your entire six-pack. I'd still keep 4/6 but if you have one of them go bad this will keep you from being grounded.
* GI 275 HSI: Gets rid of the wonky DG and gives you a lot of capability, also functions as the backup for the AI. With two of them like this, you can ditch the vacuum system and get some useful load back.
* GNX 375: This would replace the 300XL *and* get you reliable ADS-B
* GNC 215 Nav/Com 1
* PS Engineering PAR 200B audio panel/Com2
* EI CGR-30P engine monitor - This will allow you to use the existing wiring and probes that you have for EGT/CHT most likely. I didn't see mention of what model your current one is or a picture, just that it's an EI, so check on this to be sure.
* Keep the S-TEC



I don't know if you can omit the EIS MFD in a certified G3X Touch install.
You can - It can be on the side of the PFD.
 
Now wait a minute. This is the plane you bought after asking us for "a cheap way to build retract time" wasn't it? :rofl:

Let me throw a couple of suggestions out there. If you still want that Twin Bonanza sometime in the next decade, you probably don't want to be dropping big money on a panel right now. OTOH, if you've decided the Bo is gonna stay, then you probably wan't something nice.

First off: I wouldn't bother with an IFD navigator. Their main advantage is that they're slide-in replacements for the Garmin GNS series. You won't be able to get that advantage, so IMO you're better off sticking with Garmin. You mention not liking the flow in "the GNX and G1000" - I'm going to assume you meant GNS and G1000, as they're pretty much identical in how they work. Good news: You can't get a G1000 in your plane, and nobody in their right mind would be recommending GNS series navigators now, they were discontinued 14 years ago! The Garmin GTN and all of their modern stuff works in a completely different way - Just a main menu with icons instead of the GNS/G1000 groups and pages.

For the "go all out" version, I'd do this:

* G3X Touch 10" with EIS - Putting in a 7" on the other side would be optional, more on that in a moment.
* GTN: You could get a 750Xi and use it kind of like an MFD, or you could get a 650Xi and the 7" MFD. Or a 750Xi and the 7" MFD if you really like lots of big color screens and hate money like I do. ;)
* GFC 500 autopilot with pitch trim and yaw damper. Your pax will thank you for the yaw damper - Beeches are happy airplanes, they love to wag their tails!
* GTX345 transponder. If you really want a backup GPS, you could do the GNX375, or you could get a GNC355 as your second Com radio.
* GTR205 #2 com radio
* GMA350c audio panel if you want to talk to the plane, or PS Engineering PMA450B otherwise.

Now, to accomplish all of your goals while also at least attempting to not have the panel be worth more than the rest of the plane and maintaining the classic look:

* GI 275 AI: This gives you primary instrument capability for your entire six-pack. I'd still keep 4/6 but if you have one of them go bad this will keep you from being grounded.
* GI 275 HSI: Gets rid of the wonky DG and gives you a lot of capability, also functions as the backup for the AI. With two of them like this, you can ditch the vacuum system and get some useful load back.
* GNX 375: This would replace the 300XL *and* get you reliable ADS-B
* GNC 215 Nav/Com 1
* PS Engineering PAR 200B audio panel/Com2
* EI CGR-30P engine monitor - This will allow you to use the existing wiring and probes that you have for EGT/CHT most likely. I didn't see mention of what model your current one is or a picture, just that it's an EI, so check on this to be sure.
* Keep the S-TEC




You can - It can be on the side of the PFD.
Cheesehead, I appreciate this.

The second option totals to something like this (parts only)
2pack Gi275s w/batts $9714
GNX375 8125
GNC215 4859
Par200B 3100
= 26k
If I do the EI upgrade, it's about $4k more

Alternatively, Sarasota lists some G3x prices
10" 12k
10+7 17,600
dual 7" 16k

With the 275s being almost 10k, you're almost at a single 10" for the same $

I'm going to do some measurements and see what things would fit where...
 
* GI 275 AI: This gives you primary instrument capability for your entire six-pack. I'd still keep 4/6 but if you have one of them go bad this will keep you from being grounded.
* GI 275 HSI: Gets rid of the wonky DG and gives you a lot of capability, also functions as the backup for the AI. With two of them like this, you can ditch the vacuum system and get some useful load back.
* GNX 375: This would replace the 300XL *and* get you reliable ADS-B
* GNC 215 Nav/Com 1
* PS Engineering PAR 200B audio panel/Com2
* EI CGR-30P engine monitor - This will allow you to use the existing wiring and probes that you have for EGT/CHT most likely. I didn't see mention of what model your current one is or a picture, just that it's an EI, so check on this to be sure.
* Keep the S-TEC
You pretty much just described my avionics, except that I have a GI 275 EIS. Older audio panel which I'm considering upgrading and eventually a GFC 500 is on the wishlist. I left in the other steam gauges mostly because I still prefer needles for seeing trends. It's an absolutely fantastic panel that works really well for pretty much every kind of flying. I have been fairly brand-agnostic most of my flying career, but the integration between everything Garmin is really great!
With the 275s being almost 10k, you're almost at a single 10" for the same $
Brother, I laughed when I read this, because I walked this same road when I was pricing out my upgrade. My Excel sheets looked like a madman's work of art by the end of it. It's amazing how "just a few more thousand" and then you realize that you need another item (the GI 275 panel vs G3X + backup was a classic one), especially when you start thinking about interoperability, back-ups, and start wondering why Garmin doesn't have a single unit that combines nav, comms, transponder, and ADSB-in/out and WHY NOT????

Good luck man. It's fun to play around with possibilities. In my case, I ended up with a panel of 275s by virtue of some A&P shenanigans rather than a definite decision, but it has been great to fly behind!
 
Cheesehead, I appreciate this.

The second option totals to something like this (parts only)
2pack Gi275s w/batts $9714
GNX375 8125
GNC215 4859
Par200B 3100
= 26k
If I do the EI upgrade, it's about $4k more

Alternatively, Sarasota lists some G3x prices
10" 12k
10+7 17,600
dual 7" 16k

With the 275s being almost 10k, you're almost at a single 10" for the same $
As some others have said - Don't forget the backup. Add a G5. Sorry I neglected to add that to the list.

I only suggest the G5 as a backup, though. Like some others have said, it would be an abomination to trash that classic panel with a pair of them, but if you're gonna go all out anyway, it's worth the extra miscompare monitoring that the G5 gets you with the G3X Touch. I guess the 275 doesn't do that with the G3X.

Let's look at prices a bit more. Currently, Garmin and PSE web sites list the following:
GTN 750Xi $20,995
GTN 650Xi $14,750
GNX 375 $9,295
GNC 355 $8,495
GPS 175 $6,195
GNC 215 $5,595
GTR 205 $2,895
G3X Touch 10" with 6-cylinder EIS $16,825
G3X Touch 10" + 7" combo with 6-cylinder EIS $23,425
GFC 500 "Starting at $9,625". IIRC, the pitch trim and yaw damp were each another $2000 when it was introduced, I would guess that's more like $2500 each now so let's call it $14,625.
G5 AI $3,095
GI 275 AI $4,695
GI 275 HSI $4,595
GTX 345 $6,495
GMA 350c $2,995
PMA 450C $2,595
PAR 200B $3,795
EI CGR-30P $4,598

FWIW, IME the installed cost runs about 1.6x the list price from Garmin's site. There's certainly going to be plenty of variables to deal with, though, so quotes are good.

Now, it looks like the price difference here favors the 750Xi as opposed to the 650Xi plus the extra MFD display. Either of those will get you Smart Glide and compatibility with the Garmin GCO 14 carbon monoxide sensor, where the cheaper GPS units won't.

So, let's say you do the single 10" G3X Touch with EIS and GTN 750Xi version of the "all out" panel I mentioned, WITH the G5 backup AI and the GMA350c audio panel, that's $65,030 list or roughly $104,000 installed...

Or, the lower-budget, classic-yet-modern panel would be $33,123 list or roughly $53,000 installed, just a bit over half the price.

Of course, like I said, variables, yadda yadda, so get quotes. I do know that if you have to do THREE GI-275s (AI, HSI, EIS) then the scales do tip towards the G3X, but I think you'll still see a fairly significant price difference between the two panels.

Brother, I laughed when I read this, because I walked this same road when I was pricing out my upgrade. My Excel sheets looked like a madman's work of art by the end of it. It's amazing how "just a few more thousand" and then you realize that you need another item (the GI 275 panel vs G3X + backup was a classic one), especially when you start thinking about interoperability, back-ups, and start wondering why Garmin doesn't have a single unit that combines nav, comms, transponder, and ADSB-in/out and WHY NOT????
Man, it drives me NUTS doing this sometimes because I feel like almost everyone should have two comms, one nav (or more), one GPS (or more), one transponder... And Garmin makes a bunch of different units that have two of those functions but they're inconsistent. So, do you do a GNX375 (txp+gps), GNC215 (nav+com), GTR205 (com)? Or do you do GNC355 (gps+com), GTX345 (txp), GNC215 (nav+com)? What about a GTN650 (nav+com+gps), GTX345 (txp), GTR205 (com)? So many possibilities... But it would be GREAT if you could get one box that just did it all. I suppose the closest they have to that is a GTN750Xi with remote transponder, then all you need is the second Com.

In today's day and age, though, it seems like a backup GPS is probably more useful than a second Nav, so I'm currently thinking that the next upgrade for us is going to include a GNC355 to replace the aging KX155.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top