Thinking ahead - Panel Upgrades

And the down time.
Honestly, it will cost more to sell my plane, buy another plane with the avionics I want than to just upgrade this one to have what I want. I have an upgraded 100 hour SMOH engine and a TON of STCs on this plane that really make it what I want, outside of the panel. To get real, if my plane is worth 75K, and I put 40k in it, you can't buy that plane for $115k.
 
No, that is a G500 I believe, although the G3X Touch, G600, and G1000 also implement the technology. To my knowledge, the GTN series navigators do not incorporate synthetic vision natively.
The GTN navigators - And all other navigators, to my knowledge - Do not incorporate synthetic vision period, because they're not PFDs.

Synthetic vision is available for all Garmin PFDs *except* the G5 - This might be yet another good reason to go with the GI275s instead. Keep in mind that this is an extra cost software unlock option for all of them as well, though. $500 for the GI275.
 
In addition to the baseline moving-map navigation, Garmin Pilot will display synthetic vision with all sources, including runway graphics, terrain, airport identifiers, and so forth. The only difference is quality of the instrument display based on the input source:

GPS only (e.g. running only on the iPad internal GPS) -- Will always display a level attitude, with GPS-derived groundspeed (in place of the airspeed), altitude, and heading.

External source with AHRS (e.g., GDL 50, GNX 375) -- All of the above, but additionally with attitude information based on that device.

External source with ADAHRS (e.g., GI 275) -- Full data display similar to what would be seen on a G3X or similar PFD.

External source with ADAHRS and EIS (e.g., GI 275 EIS) -- Full display, along with full engine data display and recording.

As a nice bonus, you can set it up so that GP automatically exports engine data post-flight to Savvy and your flight data to FlySto, if you're so inclined.

My plane has two GI 275s (AI and HSI), legacy back-up steam gauges, a GI 275 EIS, a GNX-375, and a GNC 215. I'm in the process of setting up an install of a GFC-500 and a PMA450C.

It's going to be the world's most unstoppable Cherokee 180C. :D

Unstoppable Smol.png
 
FWIW - the plane I bought last June is IFR capable with what has to be the most minimal panel possible to provide GPS navigation.

-Garmin 355 to provide Com1 and GPS Navigator
-PS Engineering PAR 200 B audio panel to provide the audio panel and COM 2
-Stratus transponder
-Mechanical CDI

And...... beyond the compass and other VFR required equipment, that's it. Been flying it for a while, and it works just fine (even without a NAV radio). And..... of course, I can't leave it alone. Sending it to the shop to get the panel redone in March.
Dear WDD, if you get a free moment, I would greatly appreciate a PIREP on your PAR200B. We don't do much advertising but survive by word of mouth.
Thanks
Mark Scheuer
PS Engineering
 
Dear WDD, if you get a free moment, I would greatly appreciate a PIREP on your PAR200B. We don't do much advertising but survive by word of mouth.
Thanks
Mark Scheuer
PS Engineering
Worked great. As well it was a slick way to get a second com, keep things very compact. I’d suggest it be used a Com 2, as the dedicated audio controls on a Garmin whatnot are a bit easier, has the descriptor (KPUJ Attis), etc.

The only reason I had to replace it with another PS non 2nd com audio was that I already had a GNC 355 that I was keeping, and I added a GTN 650xi. Hence, I couldn’t use or need a third com.
 
The only reason I had to replace it with another PS non 2nd com audio was that I already had a GNC 355 that I was keeping, and I added a GTN 650xi. Hence, I couldn’t use or need a third com.
Did you end up selling it?
 
Did you end up selling it?
Yes - I sold it to the installation shop (Gardner Aviation) for credit against my panel upgrade bill. Maybe I could have gotten more on E Bay, maybe not.
 
OK, my deal for the GTN650 and GTX345 fell through so I'm down to two scenarios. I also got pricing on a G3X touch... it is massively more expensive installed than the Dynon. Like, massively.

Common to either:
Buy:
PMA450
GTX375 (2nd GPS, Xpdr, ADSB in/out, some level of wireless integration for DB updates/etc)
GTN750 (11k) or 750XI (19k) - might go 750 for now, upgrade to 750xi later if that ever feels necessary as it won't really require rewiring or panel layout changes
GTR205 (2nd comm)

Keep: STEC 50


Option 1:
Dual GI275s
Keep existing old engine monitor

Option 2:
Dynon 10" Skyview + DI30 backup + EIS
Remove existing engine monitor

Using a used GTN750, low price is about $43k out the door, high price would be about $52k out the door. The difference between option 1 and option 2 are about $5k, but it gets rid of my old engine monitor, which I could upgrade for... about $5k

In either case, the Onepack should give me everything (including Garmin Pilot, which I use) except for updates to the Dynon, which is like $50/year.

WDD: Weren't you nervous with only one comm and one GPS in that panel?
 
WDD: Weren't you nervous with only one comm and one GPS in that panel?
I had two coms. The PAR 200B audio panel had its built in Com which gave me Com 2. The GNC 355 gave me Com 1 and of course the GPS.

Given that most planes have only one GPS, I wasn’t concerned I had only one.

I didn’t have any NAV radios, but given I use an ILS maybe once a year, and any runway with an ILS also has an RNAV, it was totally acceptable to me.
 
if the engine monitor works, why bother upgrading it? i'd think about swapping the gnc215 for the 205, might as well have full redundancy plus it'll make checking the vors you won't use easier. sky view is REALLY nice btw, can't be mad at that.
 
if the engine monitor works, why bother upgrading it? i'd think about swapping the gnc215 for the 205, might as well have full redundancy plus it'll make checking the vors you won't use easier. sky view is REALLY nice btw, can't be mad at that.
It works sort of OK, but the switch is getting wonky and I don't think there's a way to download data. It'd be nice to send to Savvy analysis to keep ahead of these continental cylinders.
 
if the engine monitor works, why bother upgrading it?
Speaking as someone who upgraded an old but working engine monitor, there were a few considerations:

1) The ability to log the data. A couple reasons why this is important: First, to establish a baseline for how our engine runs in various conditions before overhaul so that we know what "normal" is and have a comparison for after overhaul. Second, if something happens we can go back and see when it started, and we can see what factors may have affected it. I've saved a bunch of money using logged data between my plane and club planes.
2) Easier to read display with more parameters at higher resolution. Now I can see the temps to the degree, plus OAT, MP, RPM, oil temp/pressure, fuel flow, etc.
3) Easier to lean - On the old one I pretty much had to stare at it while leaning, while now I can just twist the mixture knob while kinda having it mostly in my peripheral vision and an occasional glance right at it if I need to.
4) Parts availability, especially for those old plasma type displays, meant that we might be grounded for a bit and forced into an upgrade, or on the hunt for an old used thing where we'd spend $$$ for no additional functionality. I'd rather have my money go toward upgrades (and new functionality) than repairs.
 
Speaking as someone who upgraded an old but working engine monitor, there were a few considerations:

1) The ability to log the data. A couple reasons why this is important: First, to establish a baseline for how our engine runs in various conditions before overhaul so that we know what "normal" is and have a comparison for after overhaul. Second, if something happens we can go back and see when it started, and we can see what factors may have affected it. I've saved a bunch of money using logged data between my plane and club planes.
2) Easier to read display with more parameters at higher resolution. Now I can see the temps to the degree, plus OAT, MP, RPM, oil temp/pressure, fuel flow, etc.
3) Easier to lean - On the old one I pretty much had to stare at it while leaning, while now I can just twist the mixture knob while kinda having it mostly in my peripheral vision and an occasional glance right at it if I need to.
4) Parts availability, especially for those old plasma type displays, meant that we might be grounded for a bit and forced into an upgrade, or on the hunt for an old used thing where we'd spend $$$ for no additional functionality. I'd rather have my money go toward upgrades (and new functionality) than repairs.

shrug i get it, but with the cost of avionics and the associated installation, considering how little we actually fly these things, thinking that 10k might be better in the overhaul fund than paying for functionality you already have.

i replaced a gns480 with a gnc355, new right, but after some time with it, I realized i spent 13k to get a shinier radio with maybe 5% more functionality, might not have been the smartest move.
Connext is REALLY nice though, so it hurts less.
 
shrug i get it, but with the cost of avionics and the associated installation, considering how little we actually fly these things, thinking that 10k might be better in the overhaul fund than paying for functionality you already have.

i replaced a gns480 with a gnc355, new right, but after some time with it, I realized i spent 13k to get a shinier radio with maybe 5% more functionality, might not have been the smartest move.
Connext is REALLY nice though, so it hurts less.
It's a good perspective. If I didn't have a couple of pieces talking to me, I'd just buy a second tablet, or an Aera 760 and grin and bear it. But I figure I ought to get my instrument so I can fly to the oregon coast and my hometown a little more reliably when I retire, so it's probably worth doing the upgrades.
 
The PAR 200B audio panel had its built in Com which gave me Com 2.
Strictly speaking, the PAR 200B does not have "built in COM". Technically it's a control head for a separate remote COM box, a subtle but important distinction.
 
shrug i get it, but with the cost of avionics and the associated installation, considering how little we actually fly these things, thinking that 10k might be better in the overhaul fund than paying for functionality you already have.
A readable display with reasonable resolution and data logging - None of that was "functionality I already had". And it was nowhere near $10K. I think it ended up less than $4K installed.
 
The dynon engine monitor is fantastic and can not be happier with the integration.
 
OK, I think I'm going there. I ended up not getting the GTN650/GTX345 combo so think I will go this direction:

PMA450B (2,500)
GTN750 (used or a new XI, looks like about a $7k difference) (11k/18k)
GTX375 (9,300)
Dynon 10" with engine monitor and second comm (about 17k parts, 11k labor. the G3x quotes i got were massively higher)

This keeps things really tight and gives me 2 comms, 2 gps, ADSB in/out, wireless transfer to GTN via the GTX, one VOR (in the GTN).

If the GI275s were cheaper, I'd really consider that over the big DYnon screen, but the all in cost isn't really that much, and I still would like a better engine monitor anyway, so for 50-55k all in, this seems like a pretty good setup.

Just to convince myself, the "cheapest" way I could go to meet my most basic goals.

rebuild DG ($1,000)
PMA 450B (2,500)
GTX375 (9,300)
= 13K plus installation. (call that 10 as i'd want all the coax and headset jacks redone to ensure the radios are crisp?) So call this 23K and it does get me to a great audio panel and a new GPS/xponder with rock solid ADSB in/out
Retain terra nav/comm
 
Just to convince myself, the "cheapest" way I could go to meet my most basic goals.

rebuild DG ($1,000)
PMA 450B (2,500)
GTX375 (9,300)
= 13K plus installation
What was it about the most basic goals that necessitates a PMA450B instead of something in the PMA8000 series? And a GNX375 instead of a GPS175?
 
Well the pma8000 only saves a thousand bucks so ok on that. For the 175 vs 375, I hate my sky sensor and demand reliable ads in, so either a 375 or a 345


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
In addition to the baseline moving-map navigation, Garmin Pilot will display synthetic vision with all sources, including runway graphics, terrain, airport identifiers, and so forth. The only difference is quality of the instrument display based on the input source:

GPS only (e.g. running only on the iPad internal GPS) -- Will always display a level attitude, with GPS-derived groundspeed (in place of the airspeed), altitude, and heading.

External source with AHRS (e.g., GDL 50, GNX 375) -- All of the above, but additionally with attitude information based on that device.

External source with ADAHRS (e.g., GI 275) -- Full data display similar to what would be seen on a G3X or similar PFD.

External source with ADAHRS and EIS (e.g., GI 275 EIS) -- Full display, along with full engine data display and recording.

As a nice bonus, you can set it up so that GP automatically exports engine data post-flight to Savvy and your flight data to FlySto, if you're so inclined.

My plane has two GI 275s (AI and HSI), legacy back-up steam gauges, a GI 275 EIS, a GNX-375, and a GNC 215. I'm in the process of setting up an install of a GFC-500 and a PMA450C.

It's going to be the world's most unstoppable Cherokee 180C. :D

View attachment 147959
I wanted to come back to this post. Your breakdown of what different sources enable in GP was very helpful. Leading me to wonder how much value just a GDL50 would give me vs the big screen. I ordered a GDL50 to use for a bit to see how I like the Garmin pilot experience while I determine if GI275s will be OK, or I want the big screen.
 
My GDL50 is really nice, thinking i should've gone with a stratus 3 to replace my stratus 2 instead. now my plane has a stratus 2 and gdl50.
 
I wanted to come back to this post. Your breakdown of what different sources enable in GP was very helpful. Leading me to wonder how much value just a GDL50 would give me vs the big screen. I ordered a GDL50 to use for a bit to see how I like the Garmin pilot experience while I determine if GI275s will be OK, or I want the big screen.
Glad it was helpful! I imagine that having a G3X/Dynon in front of you would be hard to beat, but an iPad and GDL-50 is a lot of bang for the buck and can go with you into any aircraft you like. I'm attaching my frankenpanel, which was arrived at through a series of strange events. I'm considering putting a G3X in and having the GI 275s be back-up instruments, but I have to say that the current configuration is already like cheating compared to the old days. PXL_20260103_005929074.jpg
 
Glad it was helpful! I imagine that having a G3X/Dynon in front of you would be hard to beat, but an iPad and GDL-50 is a lot of bang for the buck and can go with you into any aircraft you like. I'm attaching my frankenpanel, which was arrived at through a series of strange events. I'm considering putting a G3X in and having the GI 275s be back-up instruments, but I have to say that the current configuration is already like cheating compared to the old days. View attachment 149593
That's a great looking panel.
 
My GDL50 is really nice, thinking i should've gone with a stratus 3 to replace my stratus 2 instead. now my plane has a stratus 2 and gdl50.

Interesting thought. I use Garmin pilot so thought the gdl would work better


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Updates (thanks for all the inputs!)
Got my GTN 750XI and GTX375 sitting there, ready to go in!
Meeting with installer today to decide on GI275s, Dynon (their preferred), or G3X touch (either a 10" or a 10+7). Both G3x and Dynon would include engine monitor.

I also have to decide on audio panel. If I do Dynon, I'll go PMA450B If I go G3X touch, I don't know if I'd want that or the 35C or the 350C It seems like the 350C would give me g3x integration, not hog up space on the 750 and probably be the best overall. It would also give me telligence.

Oh, I will add a comm 2, either the integrated Dynon if I go Skyview or a GTR205 if I go G3X touch
 
  • Like
Reactions: WDD
decided on 10" G3X touch with engine instruments and G5 to back it up. Where current engine instruments are, will mount canted IPAD mount.

Deciding on audio panel and comm 2, exciting!
 
OK, getting final quotes for 35C and GTR205, we'll see what the damage is.
 
The pilot who did the video in the 4th post- is in error. You can port your Nav 2 easily into the dual GI 275 setup. Easy peasy.
 
OK, getting final quotes for 35C and GTR205, we'll see what the damage is.
Hi MIFlyer, don't forget about the PAR450C! It has a MAP of $2295 and capabilities for greater than any other audio panel (except it does NOT have Telligence, voiced recognition for the GTN series). I would be more than happy to speak with you, call if you'd like, 800-427-2376 Thanks!
 
I LOVE the PMA450C in both of my planes. Dual Bluetooth channels and complete control over music/by distribution. Best audio panel I have ever used!
 
I LOVE the PMA450C in both of my planes. Dual Bluetooth channels and complete control over music/by distribution. Best audio panel I have ever used!
That's great to hear. I'm getting one installed in my plane in about two weeks to replace the venerable TMA-220.
 
I appreciate all the inputs, especially you Mark.

Due to budget constraints, I have to do this in two phases.

This month
GTN750xi
GTX375
+ Radio and Audio Panel
(Planning for GMA35C+ GTR205)

GDL50+Garmin Pilot on IPAD

Next year
10" G3X touch with EIS and backup G5 and AoA

This means I have to keep the vaccuum another year, but I'm going to work with the shop so they can do as much pinout as possible when doing the radio stack to make adding the G3X later as easy as possible.

I really considered going PAR200B instead of the GMA35C+GTR205 but I fear I'd have major FOMO on Telligence and on being able to control things from the G3X and GTN

Wish me luck! install late April
 
I’d get some time flying instruments before you try to figure out what panel you want
 
  • Like
Reactions: WDD
I’d get some time flying instruments before you try to figure out what panel you want
I like the advice, truly, but my stuff is failing and not really suited for instrument flight, so I have to do something before I can use it. Regardless the GTN750, 375, 205 and GMA35c are all paid for and just waiting for install day.
 
This is going to cost you substantially more dollars and time doing it in two phases. I could see it if there was going to be multiple years between upgrades (like, 5), but with just a one year gap, I would strongly recommend waiting and just doing this all at once.
 
This is going to cost you substantially more dollars and time doing it in two phases. I could see it if there was going to be multiple years between upgrades (like, 5), but with just a one year gap, I would strongly recommend waiting and just doing this all at once.
Thanks Jeff. Cost of money is too high for me to do it all but I have to do the radio stack now so I’m kind of stuck.
 
Back
Top