- Joined
- Oct 16, 2019
- Messages
- 8,855
- Location
- Atlanta / Marietta
- Display Name
- Vintage Snazzy (so my adult children say)
- Home Airfield
- KPUJ
Wow as in "Good lord man, you're asking for everything" or "Dang, they just don't want to deal with that"?Link no workee…
But wow.
Based on those figures thats 2 guys working 10 days. Don't know the current market rate but I would say given the work request I could definitely see 10 days or more to complete depending on what lurks behind the panel.Or is this reasonable? If $150 an hour for labor, that's 173 hours.
As an interesting data point, we had three shops in SoCal bid for the work we're currently doing (4th gave a rough estimate). All three came in very, very close (within a very few percent difference) in the totals. Some used more hours but lower rate, others vice-versa or in the middle. The fourth with the rough estimate was right in there, too. Just looking at hours and rate from one bid you can't tell. Get at least 3 bids, and then look at how far out they are booked to see what works for you.I had much more extensive work in my 210 as well as my 182. The hours seem a bit high compared to what my avionics guy billed. Definitely get a second opinion.
I had much more extensive work in my 210 as well as my 182. The hours seem a bit high compared to what my avionics guy billed. Definitely get a second opinion.
That $#!t adds up fast.and fix other things.
As somebody that does this work non professionally, I can say that when I do the work for myself, I’m amazed at how many hours it takes me to do things because I tend to go down rabbit holes to fix things I wouldn’t on a fixed cost job. Meaning, less money = less quality.One estimate is 2.5 times the other for labor cost / hours.
Spidey sense question? Is the high cost option reasonable, meaning the lower cost option is a poor quality option? Or is the lower cost option reasonable, meaning I’d pay an extra $16000 for same quality of work for no benefit.
Too many variables to give a good answer. Are both repair stations? What is the actual shop rate? How busy is each shop? And so on. Just as shown in Post 11, I worked in a similar fashion and was able to under bid most work within my capabilities. So cost is not always a direct relation to quality or benefit. You need to make sure you are comparing both or a third shop equally to see which is the best bang and result.Is the high cost option reasonable, meaning the lower cost option is a poor quality option?
I read the other comments and lumped them together with your earlier oneOne estimate is 2.5 times the other for labor cost / hours.
Spidey sense question? Is the high cost option reasonable, meaning the lower cost option is a poor quality option? Or is the lower cost option reasonable, meaning I’d pay an extra $16000 for same quality of work for no benefit.
Wise comment. And it adds to this first world dilemma.You obviously had previously done avionics upgrades (GFC500, etc), so why not just use that shop?
Less expensive. Top Quality work. Meets schedule.
Pick two.
Second estimate is for $10,000 labor and $10,000 parts. I think I’ll get a third estimate.
It's only money.At this point the only shop that might actually do the work is the $36k one.
At this point the only shop that might actually do the work is the $36k one.
If you include south Louisiana, the avionics guy I use is excellent and very reasonable, including new panel work.If you’re willing to travel to Florida, I know a good avionics shop.
Don't tell my wife - we have family thereYou’d also have to relocate to the ATL area. Booming area - you open a branch office here !