Tesla Model 3 - Finally.

It's very natural. Put your hand on the handle and the button is under your thumb.

The mechanical release is for if the car has lost power.
I think "very" is overstating it quite a bit. As a driver, for some reason I'm more inclined to use the button. Not sure why. But as a front seat passenger, my hand is more apt to be on or near the mechanical lever. Lifting it up and poking the door with my elbow seems the most natural to me. I guess others don't drive aggressive enough for me to keep my hand on the handle. :)
 
Yes. The frunk. Not everything needs the highest level of security. Some things you don't want to leave in the open.

It might help if you remember that I valet my car several times per month. That's why I want some things to be more difficult to get to than an unlocked compartment.

It might help if you remember that not every one uses a car the way you do.

maybe tesla would create a valet mode for the vehicle, a mode in which lots of functions are not available. But hopefully tesla would also not make the valet mode the default and require the driver to take it out of valet mode every freakin time they get in the car...
 
I've enjoyed reading this thread, and others regarding EVs. Yup there are people that are completely in love with their EV (some even can't grasp why anyone wouldn't drive one). But the numerous little "features" and quirks reinforce my assessment that EVs do. not. meet. my. driving. needs.

to each his own.
 
btw - does anyone know if the tesla environmental controls has a deadzone?
 
I've enjoyed reading this thread, and others regarding EVs. Yup there are people that are completely in love with their EV (some even can't grasp why anyone wouldn't drive one). But the numerous little "features" and quirks reinforce my assessment that EVs do. not. meet. my. driving. needs.

to each his own.
Have you driven a Tesla or just read about them?
 
It might help if you remember that not every one uses a car the way you do.

maybe tesla would create a valet mode for the vehicle, a mode in which lots of functions are not available. But hopefully tesla would also not make the valet mode the default and require the driver to take it out of valet mode every freakin time they get in the car...

They have that already. It's called a valet key card.
 
I've enjoyed reading this thread, and others regarding EVs. Yup there are people that are completely in love with their EV (some even can't grasp why anyone wouldn't drive one). But the numerous little "features" and quirks reinforce my assessment that EVs do. not. meet. my. driving. needs.

to each his own.
There are many choices now for EVs. As this thread is mostly about Teslas, you will read the quirks and "features" that Tesla vehicles have, which skews your assessment. Other EVs will be different, and may well meet your needs better. Or they might not. There wouldn't be so many makes, models, and styles if a single vehicle met everyone's needs. EVs have come a long way in the areas that concerned people, mostly range. Fast charging will be the next major change (except for Tesla, as I noted earlier in the thread). As I also noted earlier in the thread, see what the Chinese have already done. If I owned a chain of gas stations, I'd consider investing in fast chargers to support those new batteries that have a demonstrated charge time of 5 minutes. One company potentially uniquely situated for this is Sapp Bros. I see their coffee pots starting in PA all the way out to CO along I-80.
 
maybe tesla would create a valet mode for the vehicle
It does have a valet mode and I use it every time I valet my car. Here is what it does.

Limits maximum speed to 70 mph (113 km/h) (i.e. Bueller, Bueller)
Reduces acceleration to a lower, "chill" setting.
Locks the front trunk (frunk) and glove box to prevent access to your valuables.
Hides personal information such as your home and work addresses, contacts, and trip history from the touchscreen.
Disables certain features like Autopilot, voice commands, HomeLink, and access to driver profiles.
Disables Wi-Fi and Bluetooth pairing (though previously connected devices may still connect if in range).
Requires a PIN to deactivate Valet Mode, ensuring only you can restore full access.

Valet mode is optional. PIN to open the glove box is optional. PIN to drive is optional. Set your preferences once and the car remembers them and configures the car for you whenever it detects that you are the driver.

EVs do. not. meet. my. driving. needs.
Then don't buy one. I'm good with that.

I have no interest in pickup trucks. They are very popular with many people. I've never bought one, never will buy one, and have never tried to convince a pickup owner that they made a bad choice.

does anyone know if the tesla environmental controls has a deadzone?
I'm not sure what you mean by a dead zone. I haven't noticed a "dead zone" on the temperature setting. i.e. I don't need to cycle the temperature setting up/down to achieve the cabin temp I want. It cuts off the vents in the areas of the car that are unoccupied. Seems to work well. Heated steering wheel, front seats, and ventilated front seats (refreshed) can be set to Auto. That works really well.

Jack has a very good point. There are plenty of good EVs out there that are of a much more conventional design for people who prefer that. Tesla redesigned the driver/car interface from the ground up and ditched most of the legacy conventions. Many of us love the design but I'm not offended by someone who prefers a Kia. Choice is good.

I don't understand why folks who would be happier with the Kia, a pickup, or even a V8 Challenger, feel the need to come in EV and Tesla threads to put them down. Nobody here is trying to force you to change. Why can't those of us who do like EVs/Teslas, or are interested in them, have a conversation about them in peace? Start an "I hate Teslas" thread and I'll stay out of it.
 
I don't understand why folks who would be happier with the Kia, a pickup, or even a V8 Challenger, feel the need to come in EV and Tesla threads to put them down. Nobody here is trying to force you to change. Why can't those of us who do like EVs/Teslas, or are interested in them, have a conversation about them in peace? Start an "I hate Teslas" thread and I'll stay out of it.

Umm, any thread involving Tesla is automatically an "I hate Tesla thread". The Tesla fan club was so loud and obnoxious, that the Tesla fan club effectively created their own nemesis of haters.

Tim (I could not resist, although there is a grain of truth to it)
 
Umm, any thread involving Tesla is automatically an "I hate Tesla thread". The Tesla fan club was so loud and obnoxious, that the Tesla fan club effectively created their own nemesis of haters.
If the Tesla haters don't read the Tesla threads then there won't be a problem. We aren't in the pickup truck threads talking about Teslas.
 
Went to drive into work today and the MX wouldn’t let me because of PIN number.
This right here bothers me a lot. Not unique to EVs, I'm sure. I simply cannot conceive of having a vehicle that the manufacturer (or dealership, even) could remotely render inoperable. How are folks okay with this?

My current car is a stick-shift that doesn't even have Bluetooth, let alone screens, so if I'm locked out it's because of my own stupidity. I'm considering a hybrid for my next vehicle but any sort of remote lock-out capability would be a non-starter. Hopefully this doesn't become the norm.
 
This right here bothers me a lot. Not unique to EVs, I'm sure. I simply cannot conceive of having a vehicle that the manufacturer (or dealership, even) could remotely render inoperable. How are folks okay with this?

My current car is a stick-shift that doesn't even have Bluetooth, let alone screens, so if I'm locked out it's because of my own stupidity. I'm considering a hybrid for my next vehicle but any sort of remote lock-out capability would be a non-starter. Hopefully this doesn't become the norm.
I actually understand if we’re talking repossession or say the vehicle is involved in a crime. But, they locked me out because of a bill that I was waiting to pay after “pay bill” button on the app turned blue. They just do too much through the app and too much opportunity for typos. Some things are just easier in person or over the phone.
 
It's hard to imagine the thinking that went into designing/implementing a system that would require the user to use ANY menu to open the glove box...

smh

any human factor experts want to defend it?

(I can imagine late one night some engineers at tesla, or rather I should say some drunk engineers at tesla, came up with a contest to implement the dumbest "feature" and sneak it past the approval process....)
Oh I think you've grossly underestimated the power of software engineers to build user interfaces sideways to the logic the rest of the world would use. Or grossly overestimated the quality process that governs usability in almost every software organization I've been part of for 40 years. No alcohol, or gambling would have been required to get something like that through in the absence of either a regular user or a human factors expert involved.

I want to add this: no malice is involved, software engineers just see the world differently-it (usually) makes perfect sense to them.
 
Last edited:
I want to add this: no malice is involved, software engineers just see the world differently-it (usually) makes perfect sense to them.

I resemble that remark. It probably is also why I have had no issues switching between Garmin, Avidyne and pretty much any other avionics system. After a few minutes I pretty much understand how the developers were thinking and can figure out most items fairly quickly.

Same thing with car infotainment systems. Just got a new car, after five minutes I am quickly moving around the system and configuring it. After a dozen hours in the passenger seat, my wife is still catching up while I say go hear, do this....

Tim
 
There are many choices now for EVs. As this thread is mostly about Teslas, you will read the quirks and "features" that Tesla vehicles have, which skews your assessment. Other EVs will be different, and may well meet your needs better. Or they might not. There wouldn't be so many makes, models, and styles if a single vehicle met everyone's needs. EVs have come a long way in the areas that concerned people, mostly range. Fast charging will be the next major change (except for Tesla, as I noted earlier in the thread).
Excellent points.

If I owned a chain of gas stations, I'd consider investing in fast chargers to support those new batteries that have a demonstrated charge time of 5 minutes. One company potentially uniquely situated for this is Sapp Bros. I see their coffee pots starting in PA all the way out to CO along I-80.
Here in the upper Midwest, Kwik Trip is starting to put charging stations in. Some are Tesla (including my most frequently used Supercharger station), some are third party.

I agree that those sorts of places can do well with this, especially if they sell more than just snack food.

Umm, any thread involving Tesla is automatically an "I hate Tesla thread". The Tesla fan club was so loud and obnoxious, that the Tesla fan club effectively created their own nemesis of haters.
IME - And I've been driving and discussing EVs for more than a decade now - the haters came first. And it wasn't just "haters" in the beginning - There was a LOT of FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) being spread around the Internet and mainstream media those days funded by the Koch brothers and other oil industry money. That resulted in a lot of people always asking the same questions - "How long does it take to charge?" being the primary one. When I was first discussing EVs I had a plug-in hybrid Ford Fusion Energi and I was just plugging it into a standard wall outlet, so I would answer "seven hours, empty to full"... But then I realized the correct answer was "Three seconds" because that's how long it takes to grab the plug off the wall and shove it into the car and that's the extent of my interaction with the process.

Anyway - All of the questions and negativity led to many of us trying to spread the reality that we were experiencing - EVs are smooth, quiet, fun to drive, and generally result in you spending LESS time on "fueling". That was enough for the "questioners" crowd, but the haters always kept bringing back the edge cases that EVs aren't good for, and that's how pretty much every Tesla (or EV) thread ever goes, in any forum.

Au contraire. From the Slate pickup truck thread...
I wasn't talking about Teslas. I was talking about ugly. I could have said "Pontiac Aztek" but most people have banished that monstrosity from their minds and wouldn't get the point as easily.
 
IME - And I've been driving and discussing EVs for more than a decade now - the haters came first. And it wasn't just "haters" in the beginning - There was a LOT of FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) being spread around the Internet and mainstream media those days funded by the Koch brothers and other oil industry money. That resulted in a lot of people always asking the same questions - "How long does it take to charge?" being the primary one. When I was first discussing EVs I had a plug-in hybrid Ford Fusion Energi and I was just plugging it into a standard wall outlet, so I would answer "seven hours, empty to full"... But then I realized the correct answer was "Three seconds" because that's how long it takes to grab the plug off the wall and shove it into the car and that's the extent of my interaction with the process.

Anyway - All of the questions and negativity led to many of us trying to spread the reality that we were experiencing - EVs are smooth, quiet, fun to drive, and generally result in you spending LESS time on "fueling". That was enough for the "questioners" crowd, but the haters always kept bringing back the edge cases that EVs aren't good for, and that's how pretty much every Tesla (or EV) thread ever goes, in any forum.


I wasn't talking about Teslas. I was talking about ugly. I could have said "Pontiac Aztek" but most people have banished that monstrosity from their minds and wouldn't get the point as easily.
Quite frankly, it’s this kind of misleading spin that makes people less interested in electric cars, not more. Telling people it “only takes three seconds to charge” isn’t clever—it’s disingenuous. People ask about charging time because it matters, especially for road trips or anyone who doesn’t have the luxury of home charging.

No one cares how long it takes you to physically plug in a cord. They’re asking how long they’ll be stuck waiting to continue their trip. And the honest answer is: depending on the car, the charger, and the state of the network, it can be a long time. Try crossing the country in an EV and tell me charging wasn’t a pain in the ass. Range anxiety and inconsistent infrastructure are still real problems today—not just oil-funded “FUD” from a decade ago. I can go 720 miles non-stop in my F-150 and refuel in three minutes. Interested in racing to California and back? 50K says I win.

If the EV crowd wants broader adoption, they need to stop gaslighting people with nonsense and start dealing with concerns head-on.
 
Last edited:
…No one cares how long it takes you to physically plug in a cord. ….
When I can pull a 20K lb gooseneck or fifth wheel with something that fits in my garage, I’ll consider an EV.

Until then, none are suitable for my use cases. Yes I’ve seen the e-RV; that won’t meet my use case. That’s the biggest disappointment I have in most EV conversations; failing to acknowledge my use case is a valid use case.

Now, If I needed to drop money just to have another vehicle around, it’s going to fly or float, not be another way to get to work.
 
When I can pull a 20K lb gooseneck or fifth wheel with something that fits in my garage, I’ll consider an EV.
Yeah, towing makes it a 100% no-go for me as well. Even if you were willing to charge up every 60 miles, the charging stations are not designed for trailers. Dropping/picking up the trailer every single charge would be a serious pain in the ass.
 
Excellent points.


Here in the upper Midwest, Kwik Trip is starting to put charging stations in. Some are Tesla (including my most frequently used Supercharger station), some are third party.

I agree that those sorts of places can do well with this, especially if they sell more than just snack food.


IME - And I've been driving and discussing EVs for more than a decade now - the haters came first. And it wasn't just "haters" in the beginning - There was a LOT of FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) being spread around the Internet and mainstream media those days funded by the Koch brothers and other oil industry money. That resulted in a lot of people always asking the same questions - "How long does it take to charge?" being the primary one. When I was first discussing EVs I had a plug-in hybrid Ford Fusion Energi and I was just plugging it into a standard wall outlet, so I would answer "seven hours, empty to full"... But then I realized the correct answer was "Three seconds" because that's how long it takes to grab the plug off the wall and shove it into the car and that's the extent of my interaction with the process.

Anyway - All of the questions and negativity led to many of us trying to spread the reality that we were experiencing - EVs are smooth, quiet, fun to drive, and generally result in you spending LESS time on "fueling". That was enough for the "questioners" crowd, but the haters always kept bringing back the edge cases that EVs aren't good for, and that's how pretty much every Tesla (or EV) thread ever goes, in any forum.


I wasn't talking about Teslas. I was talking about ugly. I could have said "Pontiac Aztek" but most people have banished that monstrosity from their minds and wouldn't get the point as easily.
And yet I remember you scrapping a trip to 6Y9 in your EV because the charging was going to take longer than the time you were going to be there. My previous post in this thread is also a conveniently ignored example.
 
When I can pull a 20K lb gooseneck or fifth wheel with something that fits in my garage, I’ll consider an EV.

Until then, none are suitable for my use cases. Yes I’ve seen the e-RV; that won’t meet my use case. That’s the biggest disappointment I have in most EV conversations; failing to acknowledge my use case is a valid use case.

Now, If I needed to drop money just to have another vehicle around, it’s going to fly or float, not be another way to get to work.
It is getting closer.

GM is now pulling 12K pounds, not 20K. And there are a number of reviews showing Chevy EV Trucks going 200+ miles in Colorado mountains pulling anywhere from 6K to 10K pounds.
Two years ago, this was not an option, the largest towing capacity I recall was around 3K pounds. I would guess it will be within five years and your 20K towing requirement will be met.

Tim
 
Yeah, not an easy transition for a renter without any experience but that's true, to a lessor extent, for most modern cars. They aren't like 1990s cars anymore. Tesla's UI is much easier to use and figure out than a lot of other manufacturers. The menu system works just like the settings on an iPad.
Yep... But it's not super hard either. All cars have things in different places. I rented Teslas a few times before I owned one. It was always a bit nerve-wracking at first but once I spent a couple minutes getting things dialed in it was great!

And yes I'm a geek so I'm at home with things on a screen but it's not at all difficult.

You're dismissing one of the easiest ways for someone unfamiliar with Teslas to get things done. Just ask the car to do it.
That's one of those things that will throw some people for a loop while others are perfectly at home with it.

Also, Tesla's voice recognition is leaps and bounds ahead of any other voice recognition system I've ever used. It's incredibly rare for it not to figure out what I want, even when it's navigating to a restaurant with a foreign name or something like that. I like that it shows you what it's "thinking" in text on the screen, as you can watch it misinterpret initially and then figure it out. Really slick. And it even worked with my cousin's Japanese wife's thick accent.

Quite frankly, it’s this kind of misleading spin that makes people less interested in electric cars, not more. Telling people it “only takes three seconds to charge” isn’t clever—it’s disingenuous. People ask about charging time because it matters, especially for road trips or anyone who doesn’t have the luxury of home charging.
This was on a plug-in hybrid, so no it wasn't about road trips or lack of garage charging as neither of those would be required (or even possible, for fast charging).

I started answering that way because I realized based on the context of other questions that they were coming from the perspective of a gas car, where you have to stand next to it while you're fueling, and you have to put in a credit card and all that... It's quite a mind shift when you first switch to EVs and don't have to do that any more. We're so used to gas that we just accept all the stuff about it that really sucks about gas cars because we've been doing it that way forever.

Try crossing the country in an EV and tell me charging wasn’t a pain in the ass.
Driving across the country in anything is a pain in the ass. I've done it probably more than anyone here! :D

I rarely go super-long distances in any car. That's why I've got an airplane. But when I have gone, I'm much happier driving the Tesla than I ever was in a combustion vehicle. I've even taken it camping a few times and slept in it - AC on all night and everyone else charges their gadgets in it.

Range anxiety and inconsistent infrastructure are still real problems today—not just oil-funded “FUD” from a decade ago. I can go 720 miles non-stop in my F-150 and refuel in three minutes. Interested in racing to California and back? 50K says I win.
If you want to iron-butt it or do a cannonball run and get there first, sure. But, infrastructure is finally getting there, and the adoption of NACS by the whole industry is a game-changer. I'm glad that Ford and Chevy are giving Tesla a run for their money in the pickup market too.

There will probably always be use cases where combustion vehicles work better. But just because they're required by 20% doesn't mean that the 80% shouldn't get them.

And yet I remember you scrapping a trip to 6Y9 in your EV because the charging was going to take longer than the time you were going to be there.
And now there are several more Superchargers up that way, so it wouldn't be a problem any more.
 
Quick trip report...

Left Sunday to drive from near Knoxville to Pompano Beach in our Tesla Model 3 Long Range to help a friend move, then yesterday to visit my daughter near Tampa. Charge history:

54519130309_cb34df4418.jpg


Supercharging has been seamless, as usual.

As an aside, charging even at 120V at my daughter's is nothing to sneeze at. So far have picked up almost 90 miles overnight.

54519369960_4d714cb5af.jpg


54518970841_4e1b8320cc.jpg


As an aside, we're traveling with two dogs. Often while charging we'll Google "Dog Parks Near Me" and there's usually one within a few miles so everyone has a chance to stretch their little legs!

The rest of the trip is back to Pompano Beach, then Tallahassee to visit a friend, then back home. Stipulated that this mode of travel is not for everyone, but works out fabulously for us.
 
As an aside, charging even at 120V at my daughter's is nothing to sneeze at. So far have picked up almost 90 miles overnight.
I tried it briefly, my EV will get 1.5 miles/hour. 0-100% in 12 days. When I bought it I temporarily plugged it into 120v, just because it was funny and I hadn't quite finished putting in the temporary 14-50 outlet until the charger arrived. 240v at 80A is much better. Now 0-100 in 12 hours. Of course you'd never need 0-100 but at least I can always fully charge overnight.
 
I tried it briefly, my EV will get 1.5 miles/hour. 0-100% in 12 days. When I bought it I temporarily plugged it into 120v, just because it was funny and I hadn't quite finished putting in the temporary 14-50 outlet until the charger arrived. 240v at 80A is much better. Now 0-100 in 12 hours. Of course you'd never need 0-100 but at least I can always fully charge overnight.

I have traveled a little with both brother's Tesla's and watched charge rates change when plugged into 110v outlets. Anecdotally when temps were moderate; you could see as much as 6 MPH charge rate. When the temp gets outside of the moderate range requiring AC and/or jackets, the charge rate starts to decline as the system diverts more power to battery conditioning. I think the outside temp was over a 100 and the car parked in the sun, the charge rate when to 0 MPH. Same when the temp went down into the 20s, the charge rate was around 0 MPH.

Tim
 
I tried it briefly, my EV will get 1.5 miles/hour. 0-100% in 12 days. ... 240v at 80A is much better. Now 0-100 in 12 hours. Of course you'd never need 0-100 but at least I can always fully charge overnight.
Do you have a large EV, like a Silverado, full size SUV, etc.?

Mph of charging doesn't transfer well between different models because they each "burn" a different number of Wh per mile. My Model 3 gets about 4mph on a 120V/15A circuit and about 7mph on a 120V/20A. A pickup truck or large SUV would be much less.

With a medium size sedan, 4mph gives you something useful overnight. Not so much with a large truck or SUV.


Building codes now require a 20A outlet in garages so many houses have them. Having the NEMA 5-20 adapter gives a nice ~50% boost to Level 1 charging.

Teslas max out at 60A (48A) for A/C charging. What do you have that goes to 80A (64A?)? That sounds useful for the larger vehicles.
 
Do you have a large EV, like a Silverado, full size SUV, etc.?
Silverado, what it lacks in charging speed it makes up for in weight.
Building codes now require a 20A outlet in garages so many houses have them. Having the NEMA 5-20 adapter gives a nice ~50% boost to Level 1 charging.
Which doesn't help GM vehicles at all. They're all hard restricted to 12A on 120V on any charger even ones that will report the proper 24A with a TT-30 adapter, so even a TT-30 only gets you 12A. Some owners have used a 120V-240V transformer so they can at least get 12A at 240V out of a TT-30.
 
Silverado, what it lacks in charging speed it makes up for in weight.
Ok, that makes sense. I hear it one of the best at towing range.

Which doesn't help GM vehicles at all. They're all hard restricted to 12A on 120V
That's odd. I wonder why they designed it like that. 12A is barely a trickle for your big battery.
 
Teslas max out at 60A (48A) for A/C charging. What do you have that goes to 80A (64A?)? That sounds useful for the larger vehicles.
Older Model S (and maybe X?) had a "dual charger" option which also allowed for 80A charging on a 100A hard-wired circuit.
 
Older Model S (and maybe X?) had a "dual charger" option which also allowed for 80A charging on a 100A hard-wired circuit.
Oh! I did not know that. I've never driven either the S or X so don't know a lot of their specifics.

I wonder how many people used that option? Can't imagine that it would be necessary for very many.
 
Oh! I did not know that. I've never driven either the S or X so don't know a lot of their specifics.

I wonder how many people used that option? Can't imagine that it would be necessary for very many.
No, but the type of buyer who bought a Model S early on tended to go very option-heavy, especially as that option wasn't available for retrofit. Also, people were a lot more worried about range and charging speed at the time. I think a majority of the ones where you could get it had it.

They did away with it some time around when they started getting rid of the "100D" style badges in favor of "Dual Motor", which happened on the S around when the 3 came out.
 
Had a chance to run the Tesla battery condition test. Our 2022 Model 3LR is about 3 1/2 years old and has just over 80,000 miles, pretty evenly divided between local and highway driving,

54627383792_aa2969022e_z.jpg


That 16% is definitely noticeable. 100% charge now shows about 307 miles of range. Tesla advertised 358 miles for the LR, though I’m pretty sure we never saw that in practice. In real life we charge to 80% for day-to-day driving, which has dropped from near 270 miles of range to about 240. But it’s simple physics at work, and the rate of decrease in battery capacity tends to flatten out with increasing miles.

I don’t know if I mentioned it, but for our second tire change we switched to non-EV Michelin Cross-Climate 2’s. They seem to be about 11% less efficient than the EV Primacy’s, though they have a much longer tread wear warranty. No noisier than the foam-lined Primacy’s, and we like the look.

54424585879_47314e1c0a_z.jpg
 
Had a chance to run the Tesla battery condition test.
I haven't yet, because I don't think I've ever had a time where I know I'm not going to drive it for 14 hours!

That 16% is definitely noticeable. 100% charge now shows about 307 miles of range. Tesla advertised 358 miles for the LR, though I’m pretty sure we never saw that in practice. In real life we charge to 80% for day-to-day driving, which has dropped from near 270 miles of range to about 240. But it’s simple physics at work, and the rate of decrease in battery capacity tends to flatten out with increasing miles.
You must still have miles displayed... I switched from miles to percent before I left the lot at Tesla Highland Park the day I picked it up. Despite Tesla doing it better than most others, the guess-o-meter is meaningless, while a percentage tells me something useful.

I do have the "since charge" trip odometer displayed, so I can do the math in my head as to what my actual range remaining might be, but that's pretty rare.

I don’t know if I mentioned it, but for our second tire change we switched to non-EV Michelin Cross-Climate 2’s. They seem to be about 11% less efficient than the EV Primacy’s, though they have a much longer tread wear warranty. No noisier than the foam-lined Primacy’s, and we like the look.
Those are incredibly popular tires.
 
Back
Top