Equity or non-equity club? How many planes did you have access to?….tell me how my dues of $3000 a year benefitted me..
Equity or non-equity club? How many planes did you have access to?….tell me how my dues of $3000 a year benefitted me..
At 100 hrs a year that’s $180/hr. Not that horrible really. Almostclubs are usually split into two groups... the folks that are just passing through (aka time / rating builders) and people who are long term. the former is at the whim of the latter.
my last club had a cap of 200 people with 6 planes. At $250 a month for dues that's $50,000 per month or $600k a year JUST FOR DUES. Rental was $150/hr for a decent 172. We didn't even have hangar space. this was about 4 years ago.
tell me how my dues of $3000 a year benefitted me.
So I will always pass up on a club unless the numbers were sane.
Where is the LORAN?you rang? (yes that's an AV30 matched with those awesome radios)
Looks like that ADF is in need of some love -you rang? (yes that's an AV30 matched with those awesome radios)
![]()
Nah, it’s fine. He was just taking a checkride and didn’t want to do an NDB approach.Looks like that ADF is in need of some love -
I sold my Warrior last year and my Daughter had taken it to AZ for six or so months from Texas so she had something to fly. I ended up selling it out there as she was heading to Alaska and no longer needed. The buyers agent tried to discount the sale due to the “inop” label on the ADF… I inquired to my child as to when that happened and she replied….Check Ride…just had to laugh.Nah, it’s fine. He was just taking a checkride and didn’t want to do an NDB approach.![]()
As it should be.
If they can find a working one among the 170 or so left in the US and its territoriesNah, it’s fine. He was just taking a checkride and didn’t want to do an NDB approach.![]()
Don’t them shame you. I’ve been flying fairly consistently for over 30 years, enjoying the differences among over 30 different makes and models via clubs, flight schools, and even less formal private rentals. I can count on one hand (if I try really hard) the number of times I’ve had to cancel a trip, even a multi-day one, because of aircraft unavailability.Only way I can afford to fly is the club I'm in. Us poor people need options too! It's well run and we keep a fixed member number with a waitlist of a year plus. Monthly goes to club expenses and hourly goes to mx reserves. What we do works for us. We do have those that just don't fly, but the planes see plenty of action which covers what needs to be covered for mx.
Depends. You have shared no information on the structure of the club.Not really.
Can you justify the $600k a year in dues alone? ….
$150/hr for a plane with an EFIS GPS and engine monitor is a good deal. Far cheaper than it would be to own.Not really.
Can you justify the $600k a year in dues alone? That was for outside parking under a shade port for $240 a month. For 6 planes that's $1440 a month.. how is the other $48,560 PER MONTH benefiting club members (long or short term)? For that price they should be flying new AC not 50 year old Pipers and 172s. The 172 I rented had an engine monitor, and Aspen unit and a Garmin 430 (non WASS). That was as high tech as it got.
Discounting a plane because it doesn't have a working ADF is like discounting a car because it doesn't have a working 8 track player or is missing the cigar lighter.The buyers agent tried to discount the sale due to the “inop” label on the ADF…
Looks like that ADF is in need of some love -
Even if the directional head doesn't work, you can still pick up sports on AM radio through the audio panel, can't you? What more could you want out of it?Nah, it’s fine. He was just taking a checkride and didn’t want to do an NDB approach.![]()
Even if the directional head doesn't work, you can still pick up sports on AM radio through the audio panel, can't you? What more could you want out of it?
$150 is probably tach reducing the rate down to $138 Hobbs and the scheduling rules likely are more favorable to multi day rentals.At 100 hrs a year that’s $180/hr. Not that horrible really. Almost
Certainly less than owning one would cost you.
The club I just departed when I bought the Bonanza had two rules. 1. you had to have a checkflight with an instructor every year to be able to reserve the planes. 2. Every two months, you had a one hour use it or lose it flight charge. This helped a lot of the folks not flying much contribute to the sinking funds.My club has way too many members for one plane yet the plane is still not flying enough. I'm fine w/ it b/c more division of fixed costs and more availability for meRather than add yet more members, the club is considering the approach of use it or lose it hours (1) b/c the plane really does need to be in the air more and (2) apparently insurance considerations.
Probably just different verbiage, at my first club everyone needed to be "current" to reserve a time slot. Current being both in dues and checkouts.The club I just departed . . . you had to have a checkflight with an instructor every year to be able to reserve the planes.
I really like your spreadsheet.I mentioned fiscal transparency as a key desired characteristic of a club - One of my prior clubs had a really great treasurer who reported every month on finances. I took his idea and adopted it (and continue to evolve it) as treasurer for my club. Thought it might be useful for folks.
In general, our desire is to have monthly dues cover the items to keep the airplane in the hangar and ready to fly with flight hour costs going into upgrades, engine etc.
The dues liabilities are for folks that have paid ahead of time. The money moves among the various bins as needed. I tried to write a formula to do it automatically but have failed so far. We keep a balance for fuel at our 2 local FBOs and they give us a card that stays in the plane so members don't have to pay on their own and get reimbursed for local fuel. They also give us a discount for forward paying for fuel.
![]()
I don't know where you are. But when I rented the Arrow from an FBO at KUNU (Juneau, Wisconsin) last year, they had a 172 for $140 / hour wet.Holy hell, this thread prompted me to check out our local club’s website again just for fun - can’t believe the hourly rates, whoa!! What’s the point of being in a club if a legacy 172 costs $175/hr to rent. Maybe I’m out of touch with rental rates these days, but dang…
Yikes. Here, where costs are admittedly probably lower than average, i can "rent" the ugly 172M for $107, wet.Holy hell, this thread prompted me to check out our local club’s website again just for fun - can’t believe the hourly rates, whoa!! What’s the point of being in a club if a legacy 172 costs $175/hr to rent. Maybe I’m out of touch with rental rates these days, but dang…
Yikes indeed.Yikes. Here, where costs are admittedly probably lower than average, i can "rent" the ugly 172M for $107, wet.
The former club lists $145 for an all glass arrow with an autopilot at the high end down to $95 for the somewhat tired warrior. Their rates are dry however, so add another $40/ hour for gas... but they also use tach hours, so anything with a CS prop can be pulled back for a 10-20% discount.
Which brings up another point on clubs. Paying for dry tach hours, I'd run 65% power and lean carefully. Wet Hobbs hours? Full rental power.
We're a hobbs club (@115 an hour) but I think we're all pretty careful with the engine both in power and CHT tracking. It has 2300 hours on it and it's running great and we'll leave the new one in the hangar as long as possible. It was sure nice to get it over to Middlbury VT (6B0) and get the IFR cert and AP fixed and enjoy flying again. This week is crappy but yesterday was glorious to fly.Which brings up another point on clubs. Paying for dry tach hours, I'd run 65% power and lean carefully. Wet Hobbs hours? Full rental power.
Structure means a lot when it comes to a club. At least two local FBOs offer a non-equity ‘club’ subscription. $50/mo gets 10% off the wet rare of their Pt 61 flight school rate. No limits on membership size. They also require a non-owned policy w/$100K hull.…Which brings up another point on clubs. Paying for dry tach hours, I'd run 65% power and lean carefully. Wet Hobbs hours? Full rental power.
Yes, for career track pilots… but again, the vast majority of PPL fly less than 20 hrs a year. 5-10 is a more sane number. From my conversation with the MX officer less than 20 people had flown in the last 3 months. So that’s 180 ppl just paying dues.At 100 hrs a year that’s $180/hr. Not that horrible really. Almost
Certainly less than owning one would cost you.
It was not a non-profit private club. I don’t think many larger clubs are non-profit. The biggest one in my state is not.Depends. You have shared no information on the structure of the club.
If the club was a non-profit, their 990 return is freely available to review and you would be able to see where the money is going.
It was not a non-profit private club. I don’t think many larger clubs are non-profit. The biggest one in my state is not.
If you aren’t flying 20 hours a year, then I agree a club is stupid. You cant stay proficient at 20 hours a year, you shouldn’t be flying without an instructor at all IMO.Yes, for career track pilots… but again, the vast majority of PPL fly less than 20 hrs a year. 5-10 is a more sane number. From my conversation with the MX officer less than 20 people had flown in the last 3 months. So that’s 180 ppl just paying dues.
Again, I’m not concerned with the hourly rate, my beef is with clubs is dues. That money is not for MX, the hourly rate includes that. In the two years I was part of the club the main push was to get an SR22… that’s a million dollar AC that almost none of the ‘rank and file’ would be able to fly due to extremely high requirements.
The old heads screwing over the new folks. It would cost me $50,000 to get the hours (250) plus IFR (another $5-6k) ON TOP of the $3k in dues that goes to NOT making my ‘club experience’ any better.
If you aren’t flying 20 hours a year, then I agree a club is stupid. You cant stay proficient at 20 hours a year, you shouldn’t be flying without an instructor at all IMO.
That's... Interesting.We recently changed fee structure a bit. Monthly dues cover fixed costs(hangar, average annual, insurance) and 2 hours wet. Like others, idea is to keep people flying and exercise the plane. We also charge and attempt to budget appropriately so that non flyers wouldn't really vote against reasonable Mx or upgrade - it's already budgeted. Over the 20 years my family has been involved with the plane non flyers have been a net positive to keep it inexpensive for the rest. Recent change was hours beyond 5 per month upped rate and 10 went to basically local rental rates. Idea is we don't want someone buying in to smash out 1500 hours on the cheap. Students exempt to 10 hours per month as we want to encourage them.
I have yet to meet a club that was worth a darn. They promise low rentals (kinda sorta) but the to me the reality is that the old heads feed off the transients.So those charges were to companies that held no tax advantage and likely paid salaries. Painting all clubs, especially 501c7s with that broom is disingenuous, but you do you.
Well, as with many things - it depends. Problem is if you have folks flying the pants off the airplane it puts more pressure on maintenance - even if you're miraculously lucky and it's just oil changes and eventual motor swaps. In our case we do almost exclusively owner Mx, and it's me doing it. I do so in exchange for hours, so it effectively costs the club very little. If we had to budget to actually pay someone for all of our maintenance our rates would go up severely. Our club with its 200-300 hours per year is "reasonable" for the owner Mx, bump that up to 500+ and we'd likely either need a couple of maintenance members or would have to start really looking at keeping an A&P on retainer and pay a heck of a lot more. Finding good maintenance members is not easy.That's... Interesting.
To me, one of the important aspects of going to a club vs. renting was the ability to schedule planes for longer trips. My longest trip in the club was 19 days and 63 hours.
Also, if fees are set up correctly, there's nothing wrong with "smashing out 1500 hours on the cheap". If all of the variable costs (overhaul reserves, upgrade reserves, maintenance, fuel, consumables) are accounted for in your hourly rates, a person who is time building is not taking advantage of anyone else in the club. My former club was set up that way and we had both time builders and long-term pilots and everyone got along...
We did have a rule that you could only schedule 6 future flights at a time. That prevented anyone from scheduling a Saturday flight lesson every week in perpetuity. You also weren't allowed to schedule anything more than 180 days in advance. Finally, if you had a reservation and you weren't there within a half hour of when it started, it was fair game for another pilot to take the plane. That was all it took to keep everyone happy WRT scheduling, and didn't take away one of the primary "Pros" of the club.
For someone like that, once they start racking up 100 hrs/year regularly, sole ownership or a small partnership is more appropriate for their needs.…That said if someone's use case was a lot of long trips not sure I'd recommend our non autopilot 172. …
Far be it from me to question what's working for you. I can't agree more with:For someone like that, once they start racking up 100 hrs/year regularly, sole ownership or a small partnership is more appropriate for their needs.
We charge a premium for every hour beyond 20 a member flies; though it’s always been less than half the members who fly beyond that.
That said, I would think it is in the club's interest to have all its members be more active, not less. First, my unprofessional SWAG is that any pilot flying less than 50 hrs/yr is compromised in proficiency. Why penalize the 21st and every subsequent hour flown?Every club is different and each one needs to find what works for them.
…That said, I would think it is in the club's interest to have all its members be more active, not less. First, my unprofessional SWAG is that any pilot flying less than 50 hrs/yr is compromised in proficiency. Why penalize the 21st and every subsequent hour flown?
Second, as you note, some members will always fly more than others. More hours flown disperses costs over a greater base of hours. Even stepping past things that are not DOCs -- hangar, insurance, annual -- conventional wisdom is that maintenance is less per hour as hours flown increases.
That being the case, it becomes a mutual cost sharing arrangement. The inactive pilots are benefitting from cheaper hours because active pilots fly more. The active pilots are benefitting from the fixed costs being subsidized by the inactive pilots. At least that's my experience.