It's funny how we all have our favorites! I won't go to Smitty's or Kreuz unless everyone else wants to go there. Blacks is good BBQ, but I like Terry's better.I'd go to Smitty's or Kreuz or Black's before Terry Black's. JMHO, but going to barbecue mecca and passing up the founding fathers for a chain seems like a miss.
Yeah, it's a stupid family fight! There are signs everywhere saying things like you've passed the original Blacks BBQ.Terry used to be part of Black’s before a family dispute. I prefer Kreuz over both, but both Black’s and Terry Black’s are good, too.

Terry Black's is good Q, but you can get it anywhere in the state. Black's not quite as much, but getting there. Smitty's and Kreuz are only in Lockhart.Terry used to be part of Black’s before a family dispute. I prefer Kreuz over both, but both Black’s and Terry Black’s are good, too.
The airlines are significantly more efficient at moving passengers on a passenger-per-airline basis than the corporate jets. In a situation where infrastructure capacity is far exceeded by demand, it makes sense to structure your priorities in a way that benefits the most people.I disagree with the airlines being given preferential treatment.
Honestly, if I want good BBQ, it's hard to beat Rudy's. It's a chain with 47 locations. I've never had bad service or bad bbq there. It's always exactly the same. Whatever their recipe is, it's consistent. That and their sauce is some of the best. It's also a good place to stop and grab ready-to-go breakfast tacos too.Terry Black's is good Q, but you can get it anywhere in the state.
We were planning on Black's. I didn't realize that "Terry Black's" was separate and was a chain. Thanks for the clarification. It's been years since I've been there, but Black's was always the place to go. Thanks for the heads up!I'd go to Smitty's or Kreuz or Black's before Terry Black's. JMHO, but going to barbecue mecca and passing up the founding fathers for a chain seems like a miss.
Yes, I've seen the NOTAM now. My first step was to call the FBO which alerted me that the F1 was this weekend. No worries, I'm diverting to Fond Du Lac.
I don't know if I'd say Terry Blacks is a chain. They both have multiple locations. Blacks has four, Terry Blacks has five and is opening a sixth. Honestly, you can't go wrong with either one!We were planning on Black's. I didn't realize that "Terry Black's" was separate and was a chain. Thanks for the clarification. It's been years since I've been there, but Black's was always the place to go. Thanks for the heads up!
No, no it's not. It's an overall WIN for GA, with tons of private aircraft flying into airports and bringing big money from different parts of the country to the local airports. Every one of those jets is buying a ton of fuel and making it easier for the FBO to stay in business. I've been down for work related to the races and there's nothing inherently bad about all of this. The FBO’s also hire extra people to handle all of the extra traffic so there are legitimate extra costs that those fees cover.
We shut down airports for a weekend for airshows, too, and that's also good for the aviation community because it often causes a lot of young people to become interested in airplanes.
Your personal inconvenience for one weekend isn't a loss for GA in the big picture.
We were planning on Black's. I didn't realize that "Terry Black's" was separate and was a chain. Thanks for the clarification. It's been years since I've been there, but Black's was always the place to go. Thanks for the heads up!
www.austinmonthly.com
They're both chains now, operated by brothers, great-grandsons of the founder.We were planning on Black's. I didn't realize that "Terry Black's" was separate and was a chain. Thanks for the clarification. It's been years since I've been there, but Black's was always the place to go. Thanks for the heads up!
We might be using different definitions, but I consider having multiple outlets under the same ownership to be the defining characteristic of a chain.Some of the history.
![]()
The Battle of the Blacks, Barbecue's Biggest Beef
The two long-rivaling sides of the family have taken their spicy feud to the streets of Lockhart.www.austinmonthly.com
It’s less that Terry Black’s is a chain and more that he operates more than one location.
…
On the way home he stopped at a old looking brick building that looked like it was on fire. It was a restaurant, specifically BBQ, in Elgin, TX.
….
southsidemarket.com
Thank you. That makes a big difference.If it was a public airport, maybe. This is a privately owned, public-use airport. They do what they want and they would prefer there was no small; planes at all. Their fuel is expensive and their hangar rates are very high... but they're full!
The fact (which I did not know) that this is a private airport makes my original comment nonsensical.No, no it's not. It's an overall WIN for GA, with tons of private aircraft flying into airports and bringing big money from different parts of the country to the local airports. Every one of those jets is buying a ton of fuel and making it easier for the FBO to stay in business. I've been down for work related to the races and there's nothing inherently bad about all of this. The FBO’s also hire extra people to handle all of the extra traffic so there are legitimate extra costs that those fees cover.
We shut down airports for a weekend for airshows, too, and that's also good for the aviation community because it often causes a lot of young people to become interested in airplanes.
Your personal inconvenience for one weekend isn't a loss for GA in the big picture.
While definitely not the same building, but sounds like the same BBQ.!! Wish I could remember the name of the place, but it has been over 50 years ago...Southside Meat Market
![]()
Southside Market & Barbeque
Experience authentic Central Texas BBQ at Southside Market & Barbeque – serving quality meats since 1882. Enjoy our famous sausage, pork steaks, and BBQ sauces, available for dine-in, pickup, or nationwide shipping. Explore catering, events, and wholesale options today from the original Texas...southsidemarket.com
The fact (which I did not know) that this is a private airport makes my original comment nonsensical.
However, I still want to address your comment: In a possible future where the number of airports is limited and business jets are present in larger numbers, this situation would be a precedent for discriminating against poorer pilots everywhere.
For public airports that are taxpayer-funded, there should not be a $1000+ charge for landing.
AFAIK in the case of Las Vegas during the F1 race its all of the local US taxpayer funded public airports, at all of which the airport authority is also the FBO operator. You cannot land at any of them during the event without paying an extreme fee, whether or not you use the FBO facilities. This is not a defensible situation, it is a broader trend towards European style profiteering and exclusion at US public use airports. The solution is no landing fees at public airports and public use ramps, making the FBOs optional.I think you misunderstand something. It's not a $1,000 landing fee, the airport authority doesn't get that money. It's a facility fee paid to the FBO.
AFAIAK in the case of Las Vegas during the F1 race its all three local US taxpayer funded public airports, at all three of which the airport authority is also the FBO operator. You cannot land at any of them without paying an extreme fee, whether or not you use the FBO facilities.
I was discussing this quote, as were you. I was also pointing out that this is part of a larger and more onerous trend, the impact of which that should not be minimized.For public airports that are taxpayer-funded, there should not be a $1000+ charge for landing.
Did you try coulter field? It doesn’t push my nostalgia button but it gets the job done. I am usually staying in Bryan anyway.Try getting ramp space on a football weekend at KCLL. Same thing. Luckily, I'm retired, so my flying schedule is...
flexible.
I was discussing this quote, as were you.
I was also pointing out that this is part of a larger and more onerous trend, the impact of which that should not be minimized.
So… when the F1 is in town, do they charge a $100 toll on the highway for drivers? Supply and demand, after all…![]()
Public airport runways are not private businesses either.Is the highway a private business?
Public airport runways are not private businesses either.
As mentioned, the solution of integrating private FBO businesses into taxpayer owned airport infrastructure is to mandate public parking so that the FBOs don’t have a monopoly based on the taxpayer owned runway (that the FBO did not build, does not own and does not maintain)
Point taken. We'll definitely consider the two local options you mentioned (Smitty's or Kreuz)We might be using different definitions, but I consider having multiple outlets under the same ownership to be the defining characteristic of a chain.
Chain store - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Regardless, my real point was more that if I'm going to a small town to enjoy great barbecue, I'm not going to a spot I can eat at elsewhere.
i agree, BUT, you have to remember it was also helped by the city screwing over everybody that was at meuller when they shut it down and refused to build GA facilities at the new airport.In the case of Austin Executive, it's a business and they make a lot more money off of the jets. For those who aren't from the Austin area, this was Bird's Nest airport. A rundown airport with a crappy grass runway that rattled your teeth when you landed on it. There was no fuel, no services, and only a few planes based there that actually flew.
Ron Henriksen, who also built Houston Executive, bought the field, built a brand new 6000' runway, a terminal, and a lot of hangars. Like it or not, nobody else spent millions of dollars to save a dying airport. If not for Ron, it would most likely be a subdivision by now.
Now what, what?Then maybe someone should approach the Austin airport operations and request a public parking ramp, and while they are at it demand that no fees be charged for using this ramp.
Let's say they agree. The ramp is built (using FAA funds, Texas funds and County funds). Open ramp with tie down hooks (no ropes). Of course the new ramp is a mile or more from any facilities and has a security gate for road access.
Now what?
Typical at most airports if there is any kind of big event happening.Well, the F1 race is this weekend (who knew?). Apparently every FBO at the big airport and the FBO at Executive all have serious fees for any aircraft that touches their ramps.
Now what, what?
FAA should require a public ramp at any airport above a threshold transient volume, to prevent FBOs from raping people using a taxpayer owned runway.
The overnight fee on the public ramps for county airports in my area is equivalent to monthly tie down rates locally, about $5 a night IIRC. The coded security gates use e.g. the Ground Frequency as a code and no personnel are present.
One of the two public ramps at my base (KSEE) is across the street from a trolley station that can take you anywhere. Obviously that’s not typical but Uber works fine too in areas large enough to attract major events.
Now the FBO can charge jet traffic whatever that market will bear and the rest of the flying community uses public infrastructure (the runway, taxiways, ATC etc) without being ripped off by an FBO that is otherwise granted a government license to print money using that public infrastructure for its own benefit.
Charging more than you are willing to pay, but what others are willing to pay, is not discriminating against you.The fact (which I did not know) that this is a private airport makes my original comment nonsensical.
However, I still want to address your comment: In a possible future where the number of airports is limited and business jets are present in larger numbers, this situation would be a precedent for discriminating against poorer pilots everywhere.
And as I’ve suggested, FAA should through those grant assurances ensure that the airports they fund provide services to taxpayers without putting an FBO lease holder in a monopoly position. The best way to do that is to mandate that the airport owner, not the leaseholding FBO, provide public parking to taxpayers at reasonable cost, making the use of luxury FBO services optional. If the airport owner also owns the FBO (something which arguably should be prohibited) the public ramp pricing should be regulated and used of a first come, first served basis.Austin Bergstrom Airport is owned by the City of Austin. The owner of the airport makes the decisions on how the airport is used. The FAA does have Grant Assurances on airports that receive federal funding.
And as I’ve suggested, FAA should through those grant assurances ensure that the airports they fund provide services to taxpayers without putting an FBO lease holder in a monopoly position. The best way to do that is to mandate that the airport owner, not the leaseholding FBO, provide public parking to taxpayers at reasonable cost, making the use of luxury FBO services optional. If the airport owner also owns the FBO (something which arguably should be prohibited) the public ramp pricing should be regulated, and used of a first come, first served basis.
In my experience when this system is in place FBOs on the field have no issue with selling fuel to anybody, anywhere, whether self service on their facility or off the truck anywhere at the airport. They then try to motivate people to rent ramp space on their leasehold by offering parking discounts to those who buy fuel from them. Obviously that parking is still more costly than public parking, but people who want what they offer still buy it without subsidies from those who just want to use the public airport, not the FBO.
Nobody nowadays needs an FBO to provide transport in areas where this kind of gouging happens. As I said, Uber works fine, the world has moved on.
All this works fine in real world practice and I think keeps the FBOs honest. It’s not a theory.