- Joined
- Mar 10, 2013
- Messages
- 19,488
- Location
- Oakland, CA
- Display Name
Display name:
Bro do you even lift
I can’t, I only see YouTube videos by clicking on them when the are posted somewhere else. I don’t get them from inside of youtube.com, or whatever it is. But I give you my Proxy. I’m wondering sumpin though. Is there a way to isolate his “...if I was flying it I would probably have done the same thing...” comment and get it out there for the world to see?
WHAT??????I only see YouTube videos by clicking on them when the are posted somewhere else.
Actually I have a YouTube account. I got one a few years ago and subscribed to bunch of of the guys from here who post theirs here. There was a thread here about what it means for them. You may have been one. But I haven’t ‘signed in since, don’t even remember what my sign in info is.WHAT??????
You are missing out on the absolute best videos on the entire planet!!!! (Mine!)
Assuming, that by "best", one means something to help you get to sleep.
They always put me out like a light!Assuming, that by "best", one means something to help you get to sleep.
With you?
Let me see if it's on the fish finderWith you?
Let me see if it's on the fish finder
I subscribed a while back, he told me not too. Was I reverse psychologied?
That would require me to care one way or another far more than I do.
With you?
I've never gotten past the first minute or two the times I've tried to watch.I've never watched his stuff, but from the sounds of it, I'm not missing much.
I've never gotten past the first minute or two the times I've tried to watch.
BTW, Max Trescott (Aviation News Talk podcast) has done an analysis of the accident and points out that, even at that high airspeed, it would only have required a 30 degree bank to stay on the correct side of the runway.
I missed the memo, who is this guy?
Damn. I think I posted this in the wrong thread.I realize 170 is fast for a SE piston in the pattern, but it is not fast for a traffic pattern in general. I think the speed factor is overblown.
Now, if you want to say the crew did not account for the speed I will better understand.
Damn. I think I posted this in the wrong thread.
I realize 170 is fast for a SE piston in the pattern, but it is not fast for a traffic pattern in general. I think the speed factor is overblown.
Now, if you want to say the crew did not account for the speed I will better understand.
It's fast if you fly the recommended speeds generally. It's certainly doable, but you have to be ahead of the plane. I will fly fast now if asked by ATC, but by base to final I want to be below 110 knots. That's me, others will fly faster.
Damn. I think I posted this in the wrong thread.
Max? Long time instructor and author of probably the best G1000/Perspective textbooks out there. Specializes in Cirrus transitions, including their jet. Does a weekly aviation news and analysis podcast.I missed the memo, who is this guy?
If you've ever sat in the pilots lounge and some crazy guy comes up to you and starts sharing his conspiracy theories on a plane crash (with no evidence), it's basically the same thing.I've never watched his stuff, but from the sounds of it, I'm not missing much.