AOPA? Garmin? Boeing? Airbus? USAF? etc etc etc
Yeah, all about the little guy.
Nearly every person I know who has built their own airplane in recent memory is a member of AOPA and put a bunch of Garmin stuff in their panel. So yeah, of course they're there. And were I building a plane, I'd want them there too.
I'm gonna assume most people here never experienced Kitplanes or the EAA in the E/AB golden era of the 60's-80s.
I first went to OSH in 1987 with my dad. He bought me a membership - You had to have one in those days to get on the flight line and actually see airplanes.
You know what I remember from the magazine in those days? Everyone incessantly bitching about needing to install a Mode C transponder to get near big cities, and talking about the upcoming Oshkosh '88.
And I'm sure there were cool airplanes too, but the overall theme was those two things, repeatedly, so that's what I remember.
Look back at the past S.A. articles and you'll see just how dumbed down the EAA has become.
I find interesting stuff in SA every month. Maybe you don't because you know it all already.
Good on EAA for making a popular thing, but it not about building aircraft anymore.. and if you think it is then you need to look back at what it was, not what it is.
Oshkosh was much smaller back in the day. Still big - I do remember airplanes at least out to the west end of 9/27 and wrapped around. And seeing airplanes with tents under the wings is what made me want to do that someday.
But Oshkosh getting bigger is not a bad thing. EAA does good things for aviation, and if they didn't, aviation would be smaller and by definition so would experimental aviation. If you want to be a purist so badly that you'd rather do it by yourself, then you'll be the last of an extinct breed.
I don't give a crap about some $60,000 Garmin setup in a $500,000 Lancair.
So it's not even that you want it to be more about experimental aviation, it's that you want it to be about YOUR OWN PARTICULAR NICHE of experimental aviation, which sounds like it's the plans-built, do-everything-on-the-cheap variety. Guess what? That's not everyone's cup of tea. Some experimental folks like the $500K Lancair with the expensive panel. I'm somewhere in between - I like gadgets and affordability and going places.
I don't care about a $250,000 diesel engine. I couldn't care any less about some inner city yute getting a 10 minute flight or inspiring some kid to become a pilot (lol 80% washout rate for PPL students)
So again, EAA should only be things you care about? EAA should not try to lead expansion of their own core market, and just let it wither and die?
Where is the EAA on getting members a 25% discount on tools from somewhere?
Nowhere, because there's probably not anyone with a margin big enough to get that kind of discount any more. Welcome to the global economy. Isn't competition good? EVERYONE gets the "25% discount" now because margins are smaller due to competition.
Some good composite layup articles? designing an engine mount? bending a wing leading edge skin? Performing a condition inspection (no, not on an RV-12). How about a series on figuring out performace envelopes? Or fabric covering?
They have articles on various subject like those all the time. And if you wait long enough, they'll have similar articles again.
If people what photos of planes than AOPA has that. I want a 12 part series on the nuts and bolts of desiging a cargo door in the side of a lattice type fuseladge. But that's me.
Sounds like you should visit an engineering school... That doesn't sound like a general interest article even within the homebuilt aviation market.