- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
- Messages
- 5,139
- Display Name
- Jack Fleetwood
Particularly when their airplanes weren't as good as the originals.That's an extremely small niche market. I'm surprised they lasted as long as they have.
All those in your photographs are original WACOs. Neither made nor supported by the company that just went out of business.It's a sad day for aviation. Waco closed it's doors and let it's employees go. AvWeb
I've been blessed to see many Wacos in the air. Such beautiful flying machines.
![]()
![]()
![]()
ThanksAll those in your photographs are original WACOs. Neither made nor supported by the company that just went out of business.
How are they inferior to “the originals?”Particularly when their airplanes weren't as good as the originals.
WACO was the aviation equivalent of Packard automobiles in the 1930s. They made some nice flying airplanes.How are they inferior to “the originals?”
Unfortunately, even though everything was in the public domain they had a tendency to push their position that they were the singular contact for anything Waco, which alienated a number of original Waco owners. They even went as far to challenge an original Waco owner who upgraded his engine install with his own FAA approvals for not using their STC data, which resulted in an FAA Legal LOI being issued. But, I too hate to see any round engine aircraft lose support regardless the reason.Everything they needed was all out in the open and they didn't need to worry about copyright infringements.
That’s a tidy summary of the story, Fearless. If your benchmark is the F-2, then I believe you when you write that the F-5 is less agile, as it is comparatively porky. But I have never flown an F-2, only an ATO and an F-5 (very different beasts). Other than those two WACOs, I’ve flown quite a number of airplanes and I would not describe the F-5 as truck-like. What you characterize as “inferior,” I might describe merely as different.WACO was the aviation equivalent of Packard automobiles in the 1930s. They made some nice flying airplanes.
When the new WACO started up, they had zero connection to the original company. They were just a group that wanted to build and sell new biplanes. They chose WACO because of how the WACO aircraft company ended their business: they didn't go bankrupt. They weren't bought out. The owners just decided after WWII that they didn't want to stay in business and they shut down. The Type certificates became public domain and the owners donated all documentation from the company's history including blueprints and design drawings to the Smithsonian.
Everything they needed was all out in the open and they didn't need to worry about copyright infringements.
The new WACO built the airplanes as an STC to the original public domain TCDS. But of all the WACO designs, for some reason they chose the YMF-5. I never understood why they chose that particular model, but they did. I've flown restored originals (used to own a 1933 UBF-2) and I've flown a lot of rides in new build YMF-5s. I never liked the YMF-5. It is like driving a truck compared to a nice sports car.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not happy they shut down. It's never a good thing when a GA company goes out of business. I'm just making the distinction between the true classic airplanes that Jack photographed and the company that just closed down.
You will still be seeing them and photographing them. They are photogenic from every angle.It's a sad day for aviation. Waco closed it's doors and let it's employees go. AvBrief
I've been blessed to see many Wacos in the air. Such beautiful flying machines.
There have been no news so far regarding Junkers Aircraft in Germany owned by the same group. Will be interesting to see if there is any impact on the Junkers production there. They just recently got the Junkers A60 certified in Germany.We don’t know what the real story is behind the shutdown—maybe the guy lost it all gambling in Monte Carlo. Or maybe he just became frustrated when he discovered just how difficult it is to certify and produce aircraft, and decided to cut his losses.
Two of many strategies for a failing business:I wonder why they even went to SnF if the closure was imminent? Last hurrah because it was a sunk cost?