Toyota is right about EVs after all...

Good point. We should stop all federal subsidies for oil and gas production, as well as on gasoline, and watch the price soar to over $10/gallon.

The tax credits on EV's aren't even a blip in the federal budget compared to what the subsidies on the vertical chain of oil production looks like.

The US has always invested heavily in transportation as cheap transportation is one of the many things our government does to push our economy to be so strong. Gas and EV alike. Quit yer bellyaching, and tilting at windmills, it's gotten old.
Well this administration and many governments around the world are trying to do just that. It’s the argument of transitioning to renewables will drive the economy in opening up new sectors where O&G will be lost.

With record profits, I don’t think cutting subsidies would hurt O&G. They know if they raise the price of a gallon of gas, it’ll just speed up the adoption of EVs.

 
Why is the quarter panel black on all of them again?
Same thing they did with the Subaru Solterra. I don’t care for the look. Last time I was at Subaru a salesmen said they weren’t exactly selling like hotcakes. Other than Tesla, a lot of these EV SUVs look the same to me.
 
Good point. We should stop all federal subsidies for oil and gas production, as well as on gasoline, and watch the price soar to over $10/gallon.

The tax credits on EV's aren't even a blip in the federal budget compared to what the subsidies on the vertical chain of oil production looks like.

The US has always invested heavily in transportation as cheap transportation is one of the many things our government does to push our economy to be so strong. Gas and EV alike. Quit yer bellyaching, and tilting at windmills, it's gotten old.
Can you elaborate on what subsidies you're referring to?
 
It will never be cost effective, if you're already supplied with grid infrastructure. That's not how economies of scale works.
you should be right, but "economies of scale" is not how energy is now managed. At least not in my state. Political goals have a lot to do with costs than anything else. And I'm beginning to get tired of this constantly adjusting my cost.

"Completely disconnected" is probably too much, but I want to be not reliant on public utility for anything but extreme cases.

Of course, my "goal" being cost effective depends on underlying technologies getting cheap(mainly solar panels and batteries) and effective(mainly solar panels) enough. And that may never happen.
 
I'm off grid. Hate it. Would never do it by choice. Fingers crossed that this will be the year that utility power comes to my neighborhood.
Genuinely curious. What(and where) is your setup and why do you hate it?
 
Good point. We should stop all federal subsidies for oil and gas production, as well as on gasoline, and watch the price soar to over $10/gallon.

The tax credits on EV's aren't even a blip in the federal budget compared to what the subsidies on the vertical chain of oil production looks like.

The US has always invested heavily in transportation as cheap transportation is one of the many things our government does to push our economy to be so strong. Gas and EV alike. Quit yer bellyaching, and tilting at windmills, it's gotten old.


Given my druthers, I'd stop all forms of tax subsidies and credits, quit using taxation as an ersatz form of regulation, dump the entire tax code morass, and simply go to a straight national sales tax.

But that ain't likely to happen and further discussion along these lines will likely lead to a thread lock.
 
Given my druthers, I'd stop all forms of tax subsidies and credits, quit using taxation as an ersatz form of regulation, dump the entire tax code morass, and simply go to a straight national sales tax.

But that ain't likely to happen and further discussion along these lines will likely lead to a thread lock.
Well, I can appreciate the consistency, whereas I thought it was targeted and specific.
 
Genuinely curious. What(and where) is your setup and why do you hate it?
Here's where it is: https://airbnb.com/h/casa-isa

I have 14kw in panels and 40kwh in batteries. I'm running lead acid batteries, because sometimes you have to buy what's available and understood by local suppliers and maintenance people. My electronics are from Outback Power.

Batteries are just awful. They are the single most expensive part of an off grid setup. They have a half life and need to be replaced. We have found a program from the federal government to bring power into rural areas, like ours, and have a meeting setup in two months. Hopefully we qualify for that and will get utility power sometime this year. If so, Mexico currently does net metering, which would mean that my panels will be able to bank tons of credits pushing power into the grid and the grid will act as a perfectly lossless battery.
 
Given my druthers, I'd stop all forms of tax subsidies and credits, quit using taxation as an ersatz form of regulation, dump the entire tax code morass, and simply go to a straight national sales tax.

But that ain't likely to happen and further discussion along these lines will likely lead to a thread lock.

Why aren't you on my libertarian ballot? :p
 
From your own source: "During FY 2016-22, most federal subsidies were for renewable energy producers (primarily biofuels, wind, and solar), low-income households, and energy-efficiency improvements."

Also, of all of the "subsidies" for O&G, the only one of any consequence (averages around $629M/yr) is the "Excess of Percentage over Cost Depletion" tax treatment. You can call it a "subsidy", but it's a tax provision that every single mining company in the US has available to them. It isn't specific to O&G or anything in Energy for that matter. It's just a tax treatment that mining, timber, natural resources, etc use to reduce taxable income by capturing extraction costs. I mean, you can take that out of the tax code, but it's not really an O&G-subsidy but does drive almost the entirety of favorable gov't tax treatment for the energy industry. Renewables get similar tax treatment for expenditures on wind farm lease costs and infrastructure. If we're getting rid of subsidies and tax deductions, O&G isn't going to hardly feel it. Wind, Solar, and Biofuels would likely cease to exist profitably. I'm fine with eliminating the tax treatments across the board, as well as the "subsidies" for all parties.

FY2016-2022
O&G: $7.6B
Solar: $32.9B
Wind: $18.3B
Biofuels: $54.3B
 
From your own source: "During FY 2016-22, most federal subsidies were for renewable energy producers (primarily biofuels, wind, and solar), low-income households, and energy-efficiency improvements."

Also, of all of the "subsidies" for O&G, the only one of any consequence (averages around $629M/yr) is the "Excess of Percentage over Cost Depletion" tax treatment. You can call it a "subsidy", but it's a tax provision that every single mining company in the US has available to them. It isn't specific to O&G or anything in Energy for that matter. It's just a tax treatment that mining, timber, natural resources, etc use to reduce taxable income by capturing extraction costs. I mean, you can take that out of the tax code, but it's not really an O&G-subsidy but does drive almost the entirety of favorable gov't tax treatment for the energy industry. Renewables get similar tax treatment for expenditures on wind farm lease costs and infrastructure. If we're getting rid of subsidies and tax deductions, O&G isn't going to hardly feel it. Wind, Solar, and Biofuels would likely cease to exist profitably.

FY2016-2022
O&G: $7.6B
Solar: $32.9B
Wind: $18.3B
Biofuels: $54.3B
My point was that O&G receive more tax credits than the EV consumer tax credit that @Half Fast was whining about. And that statement is still true. The argument is about vehicle propulsion, not electric grid powerplants.
 
It will never be cost effective, if you're already supplied with grid infrastructure. That's not how economies of scale works.
Correct. The least expensive energy on the planet is utility-scale solar. The most expensive is rooftop solar with a battery peaker.
 
My point was that O&G receive more tax credits than the EV consumer tax credit that @Half Fast was whining about. And that statement is still true. The argument is about vehicle propulsion, not electric grid powerplants.
But that's a bit of apples and oranges. Consumer tax credit (presumably) goes to the consumer directly by lowering the price of a car because it's "green" according the the US gov't. The tax treatment for O&G doesn't specifically target O&G, nor is it designed to make anything cheaper for consumers. It doesn't drive consumers to buy ICE vehicles at cheaper prices.
 
Correct. The least expensive energy on the planet is utility-scale solar. The most expensive is rooftop solar with a battery peaker.
Very well said. And with the off grid solar, you also lose the reliability of utility power. So you pay the highest possible rate for power and still end up not having it regularly.
 
Here's where it is: https://airbnb.com/h/casa-isa

I have 14kw in panels and 40kwh in batteries. I'm running lead acid batteries, because sometimes you have to buy what's available and understood by local suppliers and maintenance people. My electronics are from Outback Power.

Batteries are just awful. They are the single most expensive part of an off grid setup. They have a half life and need to be replaced. We have found a program from the federal government to bring power into rural areas, like ours, and have a meeting setup in two months. Hopefully we qualify for that and will get utility power sometime this year. If so, Mexico currently does net metering, which would mean that my panels will be able to bank tons of credits pushing power into the grid and the grid will act as a perfectly lossless battery.
ok. Got it. Lead Acid is probably not what I would want to be using either.
 
Correct. The least expensive energy on the planet is utility-scale solar. The most expensive is rooftop solar with a battery peaker.

oh, I 100% agree. Hence it is not a feasible option at the moment. This can(I'm in no way implying that it actually will) change sometime in the future
 
After reading quite a bit about renewable energy, it appears we have it all wrong. The current census is to charge the car a home, but storage is the issue with inexpensive renewable energy and peak demand is early evening.

A current EV fully charged can run you home for 2 days. The future EVs will charge during the day while working and then power your home.
 
Correct. The least expensive energy on the planet is utility-scale solar. The most expensive is rooftop solar with a battery peaker.
:yeahthat:

I designed a solar+generator microgrid for a village school in the Sudan mountains last year, where utility power was completely unavailable. In that sort of application, solar can be effective and affordable with a proper flexible design that allows for load shedding during periods of limited sun. We had a large, open field available for the panels where they could be given optimum orientation (didn't need a tracking system) and were not shaded. The generator is for powering intemittent large loads (primarily a workshop) and to augment the solar during the rainy season.

Sticking a few panels on a roof, with random alignment and inclination, plus shade from trees, buildings, etc., results in a system with poor efficiency that will never pay for itself.
 
oh, I 100% agree. Hence it is not a feasible option at the moment. This can(I'm in no way implying that it actually will) change sometime in the future
No, it probably will not change at any point in our lifetimes. There are technical consequences of trying to build small-scale solar and storage that won't go away.

For example, a ~$10K interconnect protective relay is required whether the link is for a 25 kW system or a 2 GW system.
 
No, it probably will not change at any point in our lifetimes. There are technical consequences of trying to build small-scale solar and storage that won't go away.

For example, a ~$10K interconnect protective relay is required whether the link is for a 25 kW system or a 2 GW system.
Yeah, anything that drives down the cost or increases the viability of off grid solar is also going to drive down the cost or increase the viability of utility power because scale will always matter.
 
After reading quite a bit about renewable energy, it appears we have it all wrong. The current census is to charge the car a home, but storage is the issue with inexpensive renewable energy and peak demand is early evening.

A current EV fully charged can run you home for 2 days. The future EVs will charge during the day while working and then power your home.
Unlikely. A high-capacity EV has just over 100 kWh of storage. A normal 200A 240VAC service uses 38kWh per hour at 60% utilization.

If you have a 3,000 sqft house, you're using ~15kW whenever your heat or A/C is on. 6 hours, and the EV battery is completely spent.

Next, look at your electric range. 4kW for the oven every time you turn it on, and another 1-2kW if you turn on one or two of the range burners. Run your dryer for one cycle and you consume 3-5 kWh.

We haven't talked about lights or other loads, yet - and you certainly don't want to be running any hair dryers or power tools, as they will burn up energy rapidly, as well. Compressor? Fuggeddaboutit.

There is a reason that modern houses are equipped with a 200A main service. Work through the math, and you'll see why using the EV as backup storage really won't work very well unless you live in a shack or tent.
 
Last edited:
If I ever ran for public office I'd likely be shot about 20 minutes into my campaign.....
I'm guessing that you're an engineer of some sort, so I think you're being generous. Probably closer to 5 minutes.

Politics cannot co-exist with facts and data, and like any living organism, it will move to protect itself.
 
I charge when I need to charge. I don’t revolved around when it’s best for the grid. Just like I get gas when I need gas.
You're still using Level 1, aren't you? You really can't time-shift Level 1 charging, but it's only 12A so it isn't a big draw on the grid.

Just saw two interesting plots of battery degradation. They showed real-world degradation on the current 2170 Model 3/Y and on the older packs on the Model S of your car's vintage. The newer design performs significantly better with it leveling off around -12% after 200,000 miles. I didn't realize how big the difference is. That could explain some of the differences in the experiences you and I have had with our cars.

Unlikely. A high-capacity EV has just over 100 kWh of storage. A normal 200A 240VAC service uses 38kWh per hour at 60% utilization.
I'm at work so don't have an electric bill handy to check, but, going by my average bill and rate, my 2,400 sqft house uses roughly 60-65kW per day. That's quite a bit less than your estimate so I'll check the usage data when I get home next week.

Work through the math, and you'll see why using the EV as backup storage really won't work very well unless you live in a shack or tent.
I'm not a fan of routinely using the car's battery for grid replacement. Might be nice for grid backup during outages, but I don't want my expensive battery pack being used for the house regularly. Grid replacement/backup is easier duty than powering a car, though, so it probably wouldn't be too bad. I'd rather have some LFP packs for the house.
 
You're still using Level 1, aren't you? You really can't time-shift Level 1 charging, but it's only 12A so it isn't a big draw on the grid.

Just saw two interesting plots of battery degradation. They showed real-world degradation on the current 2170 Model 3/Y and on the older packs on the Model S of your car's vintage. The newer design performs significantly better with it leveling off around -12% after 200,000 miles. I didn't realize how big the difference is. That could explain some of the differences in the experiences you and I have had with our cars.


I'm at work so don't have an electric bill handy to check, but, going by my average bill and rate, my 2,400 sqft house uses roughly 60-65kW per day. That's quite a bit less than your estimate so I'll check the usage data when I get home next week.


I'm not a fan of routinely using the car's battery for grid replacement. Might be nice for grid backup during outages, but I don't want my expensive battery pack being used for the house regularly. Grid replacement/backup is easier duty than powering a car, though, so it probably wouldn't be too bad. I'd rather have some LFP packs for the house.
Level 1. I actually set it to 10 A just to be well below the limit for that CB.
 
Level 1. I actually set it to 10 A just to be well below the limit for that CB.
When I get home, my car typically needs no more than two hours of charging at 48A with the HPWC to return to 80%. Doesn't make any difference at what time, day or night, that charging occurs.
 
When I get home, my car typically needs no more than two hours of charging at 48A with the HPWC to return to 80%. Doesn't make any difference at what time, day or night, that charging occurs.
My S is being traded in as we speak. Needed more range, tow hitch and AWD.
IMG_8865.jpeg
 
Near Tampa, so we got to see one in the flesh:

53549999839_2f650bf0bb_z.jpg


My imposing stature makes it seem small, but in the flesh it seems quite massive. Though I believe its overall dimensions are not far off from your typical pickup.
 
Near Tampa, so we got to see one in the flesh:

53549999839_2f650bf0bb_z.jpg


My imposing stature makes it seem small, but in the flesh it seems quite massive. Though I believe its overall dimensions are not far off from your typical pickup.

That thing sure is ugly!

The vehicle that is ... ;)
 
Wait, what?

National Electric Code says you're only allowed continuous 80% of breaker/outlet rating, so 32A charging = 40A breaker/outlet. Your L1 is 15A outlet, so max continuous is 12A.

And L2 is 240v while L1 is 120v. Therefore 240v*32A= 7680W versus 120v*12A=1440W. That's 5.3x and not 2x.
A lot of us with older houses have 20A circuits in our garage, so we can take 16A at 120V on level 1 charging.
 
A lot of us with older houses have 20A circuits in our garage, so we can take 16A at 120V on level 1 charging.
My thread-drift meter just came off its lower stop.
 
I'll stick with our hybrid. Decent fuel "economy", a definite improvement over the range of anything else in the driveway. Now to figure out why the dealer orders all hybrids with hitch receiver. The Ford Escape hybrid is limited to a 1500 pound trailer, and a hitch receiver is a joke.
 
Back
Top