Oh, that's not a truck, that's a RAM.
I have always been a die hard F-150/250 guy but their product quality has been far outstripped by cost in the last half dozen years or so. I know several very pleased RAM owners, however.Oh, that's not a truck, that's a RAM.
I have always been a die hard F-150/250 guy but their product quality has been far outstripped by cost in the last half dozen years or so. I know several very pleased RAM owners, however.I don't get it. My local dealer (sells nearly every make) shows 889 new pickups in stock at or under $70,000. If you remove the mid-size (Canyon/Colorado, Tacoma, Ridgeline, Maverick, etc.) they still have 720 in stock. The cheapest are Silverados with MSRP around $47K, but selling for about $8K under that. At the top end are some F150/250/350 models with stickers over $70K but listed for sale at or below that.Where is this $70,000 pickup of which you speak? There have been rumors of such still existing but the travel is difficult and the lands inhabited by unruly unicorns.
Looks like I guessed wrong: I expected Congress to kick it down the road by extending the subsidies again. But that doesn’t seem likely. So it appears the cliff is back.The extended ACA subsidies are a good example of how once a government program gets put into place, it becomes permanent. Now that it's about to expire, and resets back to where it was in 2020 or so, there's a big panic and pressure for Congress to "do something". My guess: they'll say, "OK, we'll extend those benefits again, just this once!" and we'll be back to where we are now, with everyone's tax money paying for everyone else's lower ACA premiums.
Bought a RAM 1500 limited back in 2019 (2020 model) because I use it both for hauling and for travelling, and the RAM has the rep for being the most comfortable truck (I had come from two Chevy trucks in the past). Still going strong. The only downside is that the stealership was absolutely the worst (they have subsequently got bought out by another larger dealer) and their service department was outright fraudulent. When I bought my truck the bed cover was back ordered. When it came in a couple of months later I drove over to get it. They asked if I wanted it installed. I had initially thought that this would be complementary since it was SUPPOSED to be on the truck when I bought it. No, they wanted $300 and four hours to install it. I told them to take a hike and that I'd just do it myself. The guy comes out with the box straining like it weighed 200 pounds or something. I picked it up and easily chucked it in the bed.Oh, that's not a truck, that's a RAM.I have always been a die hard F-150/250 guy but their product quality has been far outstripped by cost in the last half dozen years or so. I know several very pleased RAM owners, however.
Me too, Same approach and still debt free.JMHO, and what I actually did.
I made myself totally debt free, then retired.
Everything is paid off, every month.
I sleep very well knowing I owe no one.
I did that and haven't retired yet.JMHO, and what I actually did.
I made myself totally debt free, then retired.
Everything is paid off, every month.
I sleep very well knowing I owe no one.
Well all those free breast exams, flu shots, and pre-exisiting conditions didn't magically become free because of the ACA, you're paying for them.My premiums will be >$1200/mo next year
Most voters apparently think it translates as "we'll tax someone else".Well all those free breast exams, flu shots, and pre-exisiting conditions didn't magically become free because of the ACA, you're paying for them.
I am hoping for the day people FINALLY understand that when the gov't says 'free' it really means 'we tax you'.
I’m reading “The Forgotten Man”. I probably shouldn’t, it’s not putting me in a good mood. It’s an explanation of how the stock market crash in 1929 resulted in a 10 year depression. So many things sound way too similar to our current nationalization of health insurance.Well all those free breast exams, flu shots, and pre-exisiting conditions didn't magically become free because of the ACA, you're paying for them.
I am hoping for the day people FINALLY understand that when the gov't says 'free' it really means 'we tax you'.
Just like the loons who think “taxing the big corps” is a great idea.Most voters apparently think it translates as "we'll tax someone else".
You'll find this is more popular than most think especially among those who retire early. So long as the math worked out for the specific scenario, some retired with higher mortgages as I did 11 years ago. However, that doesn't mean everyone keeps that mortgage until it matures and pay-off the balance when it fits into their post-retirement financial plans. For me, that will be in 18 months when I sign up for Medicare, SS, and restructure my retirement funds.The only exception is a 3% mortgage where I'd rather keep the principal invested than pay it off. Only a couple of years left, anyway....
I am hoping for the day people FINALLY understand that when the gov't says 'free' it really means 'we tax you'.
I got pushed out the door back in September. The company I had been working for went through the private equity spin cycle once again, and we weren't "making our numbers", so it was convenient for them to throw a few bodies out the door. I'd been there for 25 years.The fact that I retired long before I was Medicare eligible is a reason we had Margy continue to work her federal job until she hit minimum retirement age (56 for her). That way we could continue with access to any Federal group plan. I'd been on her insurance since Textron involuntarily retired me. COBRA would have been expensive (at least it was a reasonable plan). We'd have suffered greatly trying to procure insurance on the open market (ACA or not).
Most voters apparently think it translates as "we'll tax someone else".

Same here, I will retire debt free with the exception of a 3.5% mortgage. The home has quite a bit of equity in it and we will likely buy/build a smaller single story home for our later years. My investment accounts have historically yielded over 6% annually so I will pay it off when I sell it and keep the money I would have used for principal reduction invested, earning more than the mortgage rate.I did that and haven't retired yet.
The only exception is a 3% mortgage where I'd rather keep the principal invested than pay it off. Only a couple of years left, anyway....
I found those who fully understand compound interest follow the same route especially when they tailor their financial plan to their specific requirements.Wonder if anyone else has played such financial games. Long term, you can come out WAY ahead.
I found those who fully understand compound interest follow the same route especially when they tailor their financial plan to their specific requirements.
Exactly. The problem I’ve seen is a number of people don’t fully understand with compound interest you make the “big” money with last one or two rollovers. Regardless, the example that was drilled into my head years ago described how a 20 year old who saved $2000 per year for only 10 years ($20,000), will outperform a 30 year old who saved $2000 per year for 35 years ($70,000) simply because that extra 10 years of interest earnings results in an extra rollover of value.A great plan to retire while just saving just pennies a day…
Exactly. The problem I’ve seen is a number of people don’t fully understand with compound interest you make the “big” money with last one or two rollovers. Regardless, the example that was drilled into my head years ago described how a 20 year old who saved $2000 per year for only 10 years ($20,000), will outperform a 30 year old who saved $2000 per year for 35 years ($70,000) simply because that extra 10 years of interest earnings results in an extra rollover of value.
But that original $2k just rode in those mutual funds untouched. It's now worth over $100k. Since 1984, there have been all sorts of global calamaties (9/11, for example), there have been booms, recessions, bear markets, bull markets, new technologies, technolgy busts, wars and rumors of wars. But over the long haul, the money grew and grew.
An investor with a long view can do just fine by doing nothing more than regularly dropping money into an S&P 500 index fund and leaving it alone for 30 years. In the last decade before retirement, some diversification can smooth out the big dips and swings and still maintain good growth.
If were talking about Bitcoin.... one can only wish, right?I am a self-made hundredaire. Unfortunately us hundredaires can’t ever retire.
I am a self-made hundredaire. Unfortunately us hundredaires can’t ever retire.
I thought you were a Mooneyaire???
and taking advantage of of IRA, 403B, 401K and more living below our income level to make sure our nest was feathered and we could be done at 59 and retire happy but somehow I didn't figure she would listen. I suspect the tackle box of hardware in her face is a warning sign.
….If you can do that, you will have a nice nest in retirement.
What is considered ’nice’ and will one be able to fly planes with that nest?
What is considered ’nice’ and will one be able to fly planes with that nest?
So, I have a nice travel plane but no one to share it with, so I just haven't been flying much. I really need to fly some, and then, as my farmer grandpa used to say, **** or get off the pot. Tough decisions my friend.