New Cessna Aircraft - SkyCourier

Discussion in 'Flight Following' started by Mtns2Skies, Nov 28, 2017.

  1. Mtns2Skies

    Mtns2Skies Super Moderator Management Council Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,557
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Mtns2Skies
  2. Bonchie

    Bonchie Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2014
    Messages:
    1,256
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Bonchie
    Probably targeting Fedex/UPS feeder outfits and commuter airlines in Europe.
     
    FlyingElvii likes this.
  3. Skid

    Skid Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    148
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Skid
  4. bnt83

    bnt83 Final Approach

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    7,668
    Location:
    Lincoln NE
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Brian
    Since Textron owns Beechcraft it seems a little redundant but IDK.
     
  5. Pilawt

    Pilawt Final Approach

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    5,984
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Pilawt
    'Nother try at a DC-3 replacement ... ?
     
  6. Mtns2Skies

    Mtns2Skies Super Moderator Management Council Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,557
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Mtns2Skies
    Looks more like a twin otter to me, maybe a touch bigger.
     
  7. mscard88

    mscard88 Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    21,407
    Location:
    Alabama
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Mark
    Reminds me of an Islander.

    [​IMG]
     
  8. ChiefPilot

    ChiefPilot Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2013
    Messages:
    168
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    ChiefPilot
    According to Avweek, it was developed in cooperation with Fedex, who will buy 50 with options on an additional 50.
     
  9. Clark1961

    Clark1961 Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    17,745
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Display name:
    Slow, ugly, fat,,=cargo hauler

    Slower than a king air but built to handle containers. Sorta defines its purpose.

    A little easier boarding for passengers and the speed difference won’t matter on <200 mile routes. Maybe some passenger service in third world countries but not really a STOL performer.
     
  10. dmspilot

    dmspilot En-Route

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2006
    Messages:
    2,714
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    dmspilot
  11. Zeldman

    Zeldman Final Approach

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2014
    Messages:
    8,775
    Location:
    NM or the emergency room...
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Billy
    If this takes off....this could hurt Cessna's jet market.

    Hmmm... looks like no off airport capability...
     
  12. steingar

    steingar Taxi to Parking

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    25,013
    Location:
    Land of Savages
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    steingar
    Looks slow. Then again, it is a Cessna...
     
    Todd82 likes this.
  13. Ryanb

    Ryanb Final Approach PoA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    6,714
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Ryan
    Does it have fixed gear? Kinda looks like it by the photo.
     
  14. Eric Gleason

    Eric Gleason Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2016
    Messages:
    287
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Eric Gleason
    This looks like a sure winner for Cessna, expanding on the capabilities of the Caravan line and getting themselves into a market segment that isn't well-served.

    For a commercial operator over short haul routes, airspeed isn't necessary (or that helpful), but cutting time on the ground is. It holds 3 standard packaging shipping containers, which can be pre-packed at the depot and loaded onto the plane by a forklift driver and a spotter in, what, 10 minutes? Single-point refueling will make it faster to service. Those are going to be big time-savers for FedEx, more than enough to make it worthwhile to replace their existing Caravans.

    I bet they won't be able to make them fast enough. Suprised they didn't call it a Twin Caravan.
     
  15. CC268

    CC268 En-Route

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2015
    Messages:
    4,220
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    CC268
    maybe I can get a job flying one of those for fedex
     
  16. tspear

    tspear Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,087
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Timothy
    So what does this do to the KA line?

    Tim
     
  17. flightwriter

    flightwriter Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    449
    Location:
    Corrales, NM
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Rob Finfrock
    I don't think so, as we're really speaking of two very distinct segments. This is aimed squarely at freight feeders (with short-haul passenger ops a VERY distant second) and that's definitely an underserved niche. Chances are good that FedEx affiliates will comprise +/- 75% of all SkyCourier buyers, and Textron Aviation would probably be very happy with that.
     
  18. mscard88

    mscard88 Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    21,407
    Location:
    Alabama
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Mark
    overdrive148 likes this.
  19. flightwriter

    flightwriter Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    449
    Location:
    Corrales, NM
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Rob Finfrock
    Next to no impact, as the slow and unpressurized SkyCourier would be an ill-fit for corporate travel, air ambulance, and other traditional KA roles.

    Not to mention that CEO Ernest would never approve a new aircraft development program that robbed from an existing cash cow (45 King Airs delivered through Q3 this year.)
     
  20. Lowflynjack

    Lowflynjack Pattern Altitude

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2014
    Messages:
    1,545
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Jack Fleetwood
    The article says, "The Cessna SkyCourier 408 will have almost twice the cargo space of the Caravan 208 and will add a large cargo door to support container operations." That will make it an easy choice for FedEx to replace their existing Caravans.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  21. ktup-flyer

    ktup-flyer Pattern Altitude

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,206
    Location:
    Tupelo, MS
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    ktup-flyer
  22. tspear

    tspear Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,087
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Timothy
    Sure? I know a few companies that switched from KA-90/200s to a Quest Kodiak for short hauling on the east coast.
    Between DC and Boston, you are largely stuck low, and and the distances are right in the sweet spot for the new plane.

    Tim
     
  23. flightwriter

    flightwriter Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    449
    Location:
    Corrales, NM
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Rob Finfrock
    I'll stick with "more sure than not" while allowing for the qualifiers you mention. TA wouldn't spend the money otherwise.
     
  24. Eric Gleason

    Eric Gleason Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2016
    Messages:
    287
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Eric Gleason
    I don't think this is going to carve many sales away from the King Air line, either. King Airs and PC-12s serve (mostly) different market segments (fast, pressurized, expensive, moderate size) than the Caravan/SkyCourier (slow, unpressurized, optimized for LOTS of cargo). They also have the advantage that there are a lot of pilots qualified for each. If a Kodiak fits the role for those companies that switched, my guess is that they picked the wrong airplane for their role in the first place, or maybe they went looking for a market after they already had their fleet, or maybe they'd been a legacy King Air shop from a time before there were better options.
     
  25. asicer

    asicer Pattern Altitude

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    2,324
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    asicer
    Does this mean I might be able to get a good price on a used 208 soon?
     
  26. mscard88

    mscard88 Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    21,407
    Location:
    Alabama
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Mark
    Well, at least they moved it out of the weeds. Sad, that used to be a thriving manufacturer.
     
  27. frfly172

    frfly172 Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,110
    Location:
    mass fla
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    ron keating
    Interesting,the freight doge should be happy.
     
  28. denverpilot

    denverpilot Taxi to Parking

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2009
    Messages:
    47,812
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    DenverPilot
    Yup. Rumor is it'll fit the smaller FedEx cargo containers without modifications.

    Only the FedEx ones. The UPS contracts will probably remain, "We don't care what you fly, as long as it's dirt cheap."
     
  29. denverpilot

    denverpilot Taxi to Parking

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2009
    Messages:
    47,812
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    DenverPilot
    P.S. Maybe not even the FedEx freight dogs will be happy. This thing will be designed such that a really cheap pilot can fly it... no offense to anyone who ends up flying it... but I'm sure that's a design goal.
     
    Lachlan and mscard88 like this.
  30. mscard88

    mscard88 Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    21,407
    Location:
    Alabama
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Mark
    If it's similar to the Ayres plane above, they'll design the plane around the pods, like the A10 w/ the 30 mm gun was.
     
    Lachlan, Zeldman and denverpilot like this.
  31. Twin_Flyer

    Twin_Flyer Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2010
    Messages:
    1,188
    Location:
    Hampton, VA
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Twin_Flyer
    Ouch...:yikes:
     
  32. denverpilot

    denverpilot Taxi to Parking

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2009
    Messages:
    47,812
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    DenverPilot
    P.P.S. I'd fly it. Dumpy, slow, high-wing, carries a metric-crap-ton of stuff, ugly... just my kind of airplane. LOL!
     
  33. Shepherd

    Shepherd En-Route

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    3,055
    Location:
    Hopewell Jct, NY
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Shepherd
    There was a perfectly good short hauler, introduced in 1976, the Short SD-330.
     
    denverpilot and Zeldman like this.
  34. mscard88

    mscard88 Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    21,407
    Location:
    Alabama
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Mark
    We had the 360 for awhile....unpressurized. :(
    I didn't fly it, before I got hired, but old Capt's loved flying it.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2017
    Shepherd likes this.
  35. JCranford

    JCranford Pattern Altitude

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2015
    Messages:
    2,105
    Location:
    North TX
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    JCranford
    Yeah, a T-tail Otter
     
  36. Brad Smith

    Brad Smith Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2017
    Messages:
    239
    Location:
    Klamth Fall, OR
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Brad Smith
    Twin-engine redundancy is never a bad thing. I think it's a great step up from the Caravan, plus it'll be more comfortable as a passenger hauler. With that fixed gear it'll be cheaper to insure, too.
     
  37. midwestpa24

    midwestpa24 Line Up and Wait

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2016
    Messages:
    553
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    midwestpa24
    There are several small airlines in the US using the Caravan for EAS service. This would give them a new 19 seat option that hasn't existed in over a decade. Beech hasn't built the B1900 since around 2003. There are no new aircraft in the 19-30 seat market, and a void has been created as the existing fleet ages out.
     
  38. FormerHangie

    FormerHangie Pattern Altitude

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2013
    Messages:
    1,978
    Location:
    Roswell, GA
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    FormerHangie
    I wonder if Cape Air might want a few for some of their routes as well. Supposedly Tecnam is coming to market with a twin piston small airliner for them, but this might better fill a few niches in some of their more well traveled routes.
     
  39. jonnyjetprop

    jonnyjetprop Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,000
    Location:
    Apopka, FL
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    John
    Cape Air specifically asked for a piston replacement for the Cessna 402. They deemed turboprops to be too expensive to operate in their network. Cessna was unwilling to restart production of the 402 for them.
     
    FormerHangie likes this.
  40. Todd82

    Todd82 Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2017
    Messages:
    198
    Location:
    Southwest Ohio
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Todd
    I could see this getting some "special missions" adaptations too. ISR type stuff where speed isn't a need, just a nice slow loiter. And as they depreciate, the non-defense aerial survey world would like to get hold of them too. Their fleets of Cessna 402/404/406 aren't getting any younger.