- Joined
- May 29, 2014
- Messages
- 4,754
- Display Name
- Kayoh@190
I'm not sure that citizen5000 is aware that non-towered airports exist. Based on how he posts, I get the impression that his experience all falls within the confines of the Cirrus website.
What I usually hear is "Taxi to runway 29 via..." No instruction to hold short, unless you're at the hold short bars and they have you continue to hold short... so "Cherokee 1AB holding short runway 29" "Cherokee 1AB hold short." Even SMO is that way from the runup from what I recall.
Yeah, he could've used a simple "hold short." It sounds like they get taxi clearance specifically to the run up area at PAO and not the runway though.
How come it's "pilot/vehicle/pedestrian deviation" when someone else fornicates the canine, but it's an "operational incident" when a controller messes up? Why isn't it a "controller deviation?"
"Cherokee 1AB holding short runway 29" "Cherokee 1AB hold short."
So was I. Incursions can happen on any airfield. Two planes are not allowed on a runway at the same time at a non-towered airport. The only way you can do that legally is if you are at a towered airport and ATC allows it.
Tailnumbers are visible to all and is the best way for witnesses to observe a violation and report it to the FAA. And of course all violations are sorted out after the accident and subsequent punitive action taken against survivors.
Just FYI, requiring additional taxi clearance to leave the run up is not rare. Some other local examples are KSQL (30, terminal side), KFAT (all three run ups, terminal side), and KMRY (28L). The last one is really important because the tower has a blind spot there.
This is the default. Configurations like KSAC (20) where you can pull up to the hold short line while still in the run up area, are the exceptions.
KPAO pavement markings include a dashed line ALL the way around the run up area. That means you need clearance to leave it in any direction. KSQL isn't so obvious, but if you blow by the run up, you'll just get told you screwed up, not a PD.
At busy airports (ORD included) back when I was a tower controller, I used similar phrases as "taxi up to and hold short", "get right up to the hold short line plan after the next arrival", etc. when an aircraft is holding well short of the line. The reason being, as pointed out already, that you save time getting out in a tight gap when those couple of seconds could matter. With that said, I have no idea if it was warranted here. You'd have to see exactly where the OP was holding at in reference to the line and see where/what traffic the tower controller was dealing with at the time.
Anything is possible. I'm kind of a smart a$$ at times and if I felt I was already close to the line then I would move up as close as possible and ask, "okay tower, I taxied the half a foot and I'm still holding short".I'm honestly wondering if the tower controller forgot that I was already at the hold short line, and was assuming that I was still in the run up. (ie: he didn't look) Since that would be the norm, and it might have been a different ground controller that cleared me to the hold short originally, there could have been some confusion there. "Hold position" would have made more sense, if he was intending for me to be ready to take off as soon as the inbound traffic was clear.
Understanding how controllers might make mistakes helps me to identify when they just might be doing so in the future. We're all human, after all.
The pavement markings don't agree.Actually, KMRY doesn't require permission to leave the run up area, as it is all part of the non-movement. I flew in and out of there several times a month, and every taxi clearance I have ever gotten was to the runway hold-short line, not the run up area.
Well he did say that it would be okay if directed to do so by ATC. Where he is wrong is when he says it is wrong for two aircraft to be on the same runway at the same time at a pilot controlled field.I hope that citizen5000 can visit Oshkosh some day when two airplanes are landing on the same runway at the same time.
Bob
I hope that citizen5000 can visit Oshkosh some day when two airplanes are landing on the same runway at the same time.
I landed today on a runway that had another aircraft on it. I did not have ATC permission. If you PM me, I'll give you the tail number if you promise to call FSDO and record the call. What reg will you tell them I violated?So was I. Incursions can happen on any airfield. Two planes are not allowed on a runway at the same time at a non-towered airport. The only way you can do that legally is if you are at a towered airport and ATC allows it.
Tailnumbers are visible to all and is the best way for witnesses to observe a violation and report it to the FAA. And of course all violations are sorted out after the accident and subsequent punitive action taken against survivors.
1. My taxi clearance was "Runway 31, taxi via Juliet Zulu, clear for a 180 in the runup." To me, that was a clearance all the way to the runway hold short line, not just a clearance to the runup area.
Some other local examples are KSQL (30, terminal side), KFAT (all three run ups, terminal side), and KMRY (28L).
Seems like every towered airport I've been to, you can pull up to the hold short line while still in the run up area. Maybe it's not so common on the west coast?This is the default. Configurations like KSAC (20) where you can pull up to the hold short line while still in the run up area, are the exceptions.
KPAO pavement markings include a dashed line ALL the way around the run up area. That means you need clearance to leave it in any direction. KSQL isn't so obvious, but if you blow by the run up, you'll just get told you screwed up, not a PD.
To your discredit no one suggested taking chances that ATC would not allow. The crow is yours here. I've heard that pepper helps.OshKosh is under ATC control. As I said earlier two planes can be on the same runway under ATC direction (LAHSO, line up and wait). Non towered requires even more vigilance and even more anticipation and safety consideration (self management with incursions and separation in the air and on the ground). Maybe some think just because there is no controller it is okay to take chances ATC would never allow? Odd.
I have never had to get a clearance from a controller to leave the run-up area... I didn't know that was even a thing until now!!
The only time I have had to get a clearance to go from the run-up block to the runway, the ground controller specifically stated "Taxi to Runway 32 run-up block via xxxx". We were NOT cleared to taxi to the runway like you were...
3. KMRY - The image I see on google is a double dashed yellow line marking the edge of the taxiway, and then a single yellow dashed line. Looks very similar to FAT. Same questions as above
1. Is the run-up between the double dashed and single dashed line, or south of the single dashed line?
2. If you are south of the double yellow, but north of the single yellow dash line, do you still need to get a clearance?
3. Non-movement is defined in AIM 2-3-18 as a single dashed yellow and single solid yellow line 6 inches apart. I don't see that at MYR or FAT
Seems like every towered airport I've been to, you can pull up to the hold short line while still in the run up area. Maybe it's not so common on the west coast?
1. From what I see, PAO has a single dashed line only on the south part of the run-up. The north part has a single dash and single solid yellow line indicating the boundary between a non-movement area and the taxiway. This I can understand needing a clearance but ONLY because of the solid line. I didn't see that on the google map imagery of FAT, SQL, or MRY.
2. If you taxi past the run-up you'll get told you screwed up? What if you don't need a run-up or you want to do it holding short of the runway? (say it's not busy..)
Not trying to be critical, I am trying to learn like others. I don't see many of those markings at the towered fields I fly to on the east coast.
I have never had to get a clearance from a controller to leave the run-up area... I didn't know that was even a thing until now!!
The only time I have had to get a clearance to go from the run-up block to the runway, the ground controller specifically stated "Taxi to Runway 32 run-up block via xxxx". We were NOT cleared to taxi to the runway like you were...
1. KSQL - Is the run-up area inside the double dashed lines? Why would you need a clearance to taxi from there back onto the taxiway to the runway?
2. KFAT - Starting with the run-up area furthest west (runway 11R), I see the "enhanced centerline" , then there is a double dashed yellow line indicating the edge of the taxiway, and then there is a Black and Yellow dashed line across the block (I could not find this marking in the AIM).
1. What area do you use for the run-up? The area west of the black and yellow dashed line or the area between the black and yellow line and the edge of the taxiway?
2. Why would they extend the black and yellow dashed line beyond the runway hold short line?
3. If you are between the taxiway edge markings and black and yellow dashed line and did your run up there, would you have to ask ground for clearance to the hold short line? How about west of the black and yellow dashed line? And why?
4. If its not busy, what's wrong with doing the run-up holding short of the runway on the taxiway? Run-Ups don't take THAT long...
3. KMRY - The image I see on google is a double dashed yellow line marking the edge of the taxiway, and then a single yellow dashed line. Looks very similar to FAT. Same questions as above
1. Is the run-up between the double dashed and single dashed line, or south of the single dashed line?
2. If you are south of the double yellow, but north of the single yellow dash line, do you still need to get a clearance?
3. Non-movement is defined in AIM 2-3-18 as a single dashed yellow and single solid yellow line 6 inches apart. I don't see that at MYR or FAT
Seems like every towered airport I've been to, you can pull up to the hold short line while still in the run up area. Maybe it's not so common on the west coast?
1. From what I see, PAO has a single dashed line only on the south part of the run-up. The north part has a single dash and single solid yellow line indicating the boundary between a non-movement area and the taxiway. This I can understand needing a clearance but ONLY because of the solid line. I didn't see that on the google map imagery of FAT, SQL, or MRY.
2. If you taxi past the run-up you'll get told you screwed up? What if you don't need a run-up or you want to do it holding short of the runway? (say it's not busy..)
Not trying to be critical, I am trying to learn like others. I don't see many of those markings at the towered fields I fly to on the east coast.
I'm not sure that citizen5000 is aware that non-towered airports exist. Based on how he posts, I get the impression that his experience all falls within the confines of the Cirrus website.
So how do aircraft operating in formation land at uncontrolled fields without being in violation?So was I. Incursions can happen on any airfield. Two planes are not allowed on a runway at the same time at a non-towered airport. The only way you can do that legally is if you are at a towered airport and ATC allows it.
Tailnumbers are visible to all and is the best way for witnesses to observe a violation and report it to the FAA. And of course all violations are sorted out after the accident and subsequent punitive action taken against survivors.
I'll bet these guys have the answer...So how do aircraft operating in formation land at uncontrolled fields without being in violation?
I want the turboprop.I'll bet these guys have the answer...
KSMO is the only airport in California that I've been to that considers the runup to be it's own little area where you taxi to before being approved to taxi to the hold short. Appparently KPAO is the same.
My first time at KPAO. I was departing IFR. After run-up I pulled up to the hold short and reported that I was at hold short for rwy 31 ready for departure.I I was told to hold for IFR release, which I did. I watched a light sport do a touch n go, then come back and do another, and then another.
Now I have two planes waiting behind me, [SNIP]
In 26 years of flying out of PAO, I have NEVER received an instruction to taxi specifically to the runup area. The fact that we locals all do that is because that's what our instructors taught us to do. If there is anything official in print about the procedure, I've never seen it. I think it needs to be put in print somewhere (probably in the A/FD remarks).Yeah, he could've used a simple "hold short." It sounds like they get taxi clearance specifically to the run up area at PAO and not the runway though.
I agree. Avoiding blocking access to the runway while waiting for an IFR release seems to me to be good manners at ANY airport.I just reread your post, and I wanted to comment about this bit. If I correctly understand what you wrote, you pulled up to the hold short line to wait for your IFR release, and you had two planes (at least, there may have been others which arrived in the runup area after you left it) in the runup area behind you. Getting an IFR release can sometimes take a bit of time; it requires coordination with departure control who need to find a spot in the overall area traffic to fit you in. I've had to wait 10 minutes or more sometimes at KPAO. By pulling up to the hold short line on your own without the release, you were blocking access to the runway for any VFR planes waiting in the runup. That's one reason tower wants you to stay on one of the T-bars in the runup; you won't block other's access to the runway.
Even at KSJC, when ground instructs me to taxi from the Whiskey-Delta runup area to 30L at Bravo via Whiskey, I make sure to stay well to the right on Bravo at the hold short line if I'm IFR while waiting for release. That way other planes can pass me and get access to the runway while I'm waiting for release. There's not room to allow others to pass if holding short at KPAO, hence the need to stay in the runup area.
In 26 years of flying out of PAO, I have NEVER received an instruction to taxi specifically to the runup area. The fact that we locals all do that is because that's what our instructors taught us to do. If there is anything official in print about the procedure, I've never seen it. I think it needs to be put in print somewhere (probably in the A/FD remarks).
I just reread your post, and I wanted to comment about this bit. If I correctly understand what you wrote, you pulled up to the hold short line to wait for your IFR release, and you had two planes (at least, there may have been others which arrived in the runup area after you left it) in the runup area behind you. Getting an IFR release can sometimes take a bit of time; it requires coordination with departure control who need to find a spot in the overall area traffic to fit you in. I've had to wait 10 minutes or more sometimes at KPAO. By pulling up to the hold short line on your own without the release, you were blocking access to the runway for any VFR planes waiting in the runup. That's one reason tower wants you to stay on one of the T-bars in the runup; you won't block other's access to the runway.
Even at KSJC, when ground instructs me to taxi from the Whiskey-Delta runup area to 30L at Bravo via Whiskey, I make sure to stay well to the right on Bravo at the hold short line if I'm IFR while waiting for release. That way other planes can pass me and get access to the runway while I'm waiting for release. There's not room to allow others to pass if holding short at KPAO, hence the need to stay in the runup area.
Actually, when I pulled up to the hold short line (and my taxi clearance was to that line) there were no other planes rolling on the ground. It was while I was at the hold short that two more planes taxi from parking to the run up area.
However, your point is well taken. I'm an IFR newb, having only cert'd last November, and this is the first time that I've departed an airport like KPAO. Every IFR flight I've had prior has been from larger airports, (Mostly KSCK and KMRY) that are not as busy, and are definitely not under a busy bravo approach. Thus, I've never had to wait more than a few minutes for my release. To be honest, I was not aware that releases can take that long to receive. These considerations are some of the things that were explained to me by my instructor yesterday when I met with him to review the incident and learn from it.
I honestly think that this incident is an opportunity for KPAO to learn something as well. The airport is unique in several ways. The shape, the location in relation to other airports (and the bravo approach), the short runway WITH a tower, and the fact that there is actually some ground control in the parking area.They should either publish the requirement to stage in the run up area, or their taxi clearances should be to the run up, not the runway. (Or both.) It is a public airport, so such operational requirements should include those who were not trained at that airport.
It would also help if controllers didn't instruct a plane that was AT the hold short to PULL UP and hold short. "Hold position, you're next" might have been more appropriate. But again, the error of pulling across that line is on me.
Was the unoccupied aircraft on the runway?Pilot adjusting headset hits another plane on the ground https://generalaviationnews.com/201...=email&utm_term=0_62525a9780-9aac57b78b-95105
I agree that when they tell you to taxi to a runway you could technically taxi all the way to the hold short line. If they want you to stop in the runup area they should say so. They shouldn't rely on transients to have local knowledge unless it's published somewhere, hopefully on ATIS. On the other hand, it's courteous not to block the entrance to the runway, especially if you are IFR and waiting for a release. It can sometimes take a long time to get a release from a satellite airport under a Class B. In your case ground probably should have told you to taxi to the runup area to await your release. Maybe they thought you were there, which would explain why they told you to "pull up". They probably had your release at that point.For everyone's benefit, (and argument) the following has been verified via the audio tapes:
1. My taxi clearance was "Runway 31, taxi via Juliet Zulu, clear for a 180 in the runup." To me, that was a clearance all the way to the runway hold short line, not just a clearance to the runup area.
2. After my runup, I pulled up to (about 10ft short of) the hold short line for Rwy 31, and reported that I was holding short at rwy 31 and ready for departure. Tower acknowledged and told me to hold for IFR release, which I acknowledged.
3. About 10 minutes later, I am told to "Pull up and hold short runway 31."
But didn't you say you were holding like ten feet back from the line? Isn't it possible they wanted your nose up to the line for spacing behind you? That's a reason they'd ask you to move up and hold short.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree that when they tell you to taxi to a runway you could technically taxi all the way to the hold short line. If they want you to stop in the runup area they should say so. They shouldn't rely on transients to have local knowledge unless it's published somewhere, hopefully on ATIS. On the other hand, it's courteous not to block the entrance to the runway, especially if you are IFR and waiting for a release. It can sometimes take a long time to get a release from a satellite airport under a Class B. In your case ground probably should have told you to taxi to the runup area to await your release. Maybe they thought you were there, which would explain why they told you to "pull up". They probably had your release at that point.