Bittersweet day, another crash at CRQ.

Ive been following this thread on 3 different boards. Seems conflicting stories about what happened before the video picks up, but one who was allegedly thee said that they hit hard on the initial impact which may indeed have incapacitated them.

This doesn't jive with what I've been told by people who were working the ramp at the time, nor does it jive with the conversations recorded on tower and ground frequencies.
 
BTW, Live ATC has the recordings. 11/19 0000-0030z

You can hear all his calls starting pretty early in the tower recording. Somewhere around 14min is where he attempts to land on the cart, shortly after he talks to ground. It's not until around 20min in where you hear the ground controller react and tower to close the airport.
 
Also, there are video cameras all over that building, and I know at least some of them link to the tower. I'm about 99% sure this entire thing is on video somewhere start to finish, but those videos are likely in the hands of the NTSB right now.
 
I would add belted in properly.

Question: Would an inertial reel belt lock in a situation where centripetal force built up slowly? I don't think it would.

Assuming they got thrown out, I think it would make a better case for manually tightened harnesses.

Doesn't matter, the lap belt will still hold. If they had the ability to get out of the help, they had the ability to roll off the throttle and shut down the helicopter.
 
Also, there are video cameras all over that building, and I know at least some of them link to the tower. I'm about 99% sure this entire thing is on video somewhere start to finish, but those videos are likely in the hands of the NTSB right now.
I'm sure the truth is out there and will be easily identified/cause determined. Right now there is waaaaay too much misinformation. From the type of helo involved to the pilot involved.

I have seen people on 3 different boards claim to know for certain who the pilot was......and those claims include both the experienced guy and the low time PP from Montana.
 
I'm sure the truth is out there and will be easily identified/cause determined. Right now there is waaaaay too much misinformation. From the type of helo involved to the pilot involved.

I have seen people on 3 different boards claim to know for certain who the pilot was......and those claims include both the experienced guy and the low time PP from Montana.

It's all irrelevant, the only two people involved in the event are dead because they evacuated a running helicopter.
 

Well, this keeps getting more and more interesting....

That wreckage is indeed an AS350 with the N-number N711BE

Also shown here:
11906103_715065618625858_594874080_n.jpg


Here is the 407 that shows registration N711BE:
12808615703_038c91a348_b.jpg


FAA Prelim calls it a Bell 407.
http://www.asias.faa.gov/pls/apex/f?p=100:96:::::P96_ENTRY_DATE,P96_FATAL_FLG:19-NOV-15,YES

If you look it up on Flight Aware, it shows as a 2013 Bell 407:
http://flightaware.com/resources/registration/N711BE

If you look it up in the FAA database, N711BE is reserved by a Bruce Allen Erickson with a Montana address.....which is NOT the high time very experienced Bruce Allen Erickson.
http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNum_Results.aspx?NNumbertxt=N711BE

What are the odds of two different helicopters with the same N-number and two pilots with the exact same name?
 
Last edited:
It's all irrelevant, the only two people involved in the event are dead because they evacuated a running helicopter.
But we don't actually know that is what they did. That is what some 'witness' claimed to have happened, but if there is anything that this accident shows is how many people can claim to know what happened and who was involved and be wrong.
 
But we don't actually know that is what they did. That is what some 'witness' claimed to have happened, but if there is anything that this accident shows is how many people can claim to know what happened and who was involved and be wrong.

However it went wrong, they're dead.
 
No kidding.

I'm still wondering why the no one cut the engine. Dead or unconscious makes more sense, and in the one video clip I saw, I didn't see anyone get out, but you would think a landing hard enough to incapacitate or kill them would have at least knocked the tail off on impact.:dunno: The NTSB report on this should be interesting.
 
I'm still wondering why the no one cut the engine. Dead or unconscious makes more sense, and in the one video clip I saw, I didn't see anyone get out, but you would think a landing hard enough to incapacitate or kill them would have at least knocked the tail off on impact.:dunno: The NTSB report on this should be interesting.

Could have been injured. Like these guys:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=x219-KtdgkQ
 
Right, that helo crashed and the pilots were incapacitated, I can understand that. But that's not what this picture is being painted as.
As I pointed out....you seem hung up on prelim details that may or may not be accurate (there are already some inconsistencies).

The 'picture being painted' is being done by many people simply throwing buckets of paint on a canvass.

But as StinkBug pointed out, the area is well covered by security cameras. I am fairly sure that between the video that the NTSB already has and the coroner reports, the truth will eventually be known.
 
As I pointed out....you seem hung up on prelim details that may or may not be accurate (there are already some inconsistencies).

The 'picture being painted' is being done by many people simply throwing buckets of paint on a canvass.

But as StinkBug pointed out, the area is well covered by security cameras. I am fairly sure that between the video that the NTSB already has and the coroner reports, the truth will eventually be known.

I'm not hung on anything, I'm confused, and the only info I have is the video, and post 42's reference to the live communication feed, neither of which leave me with the impression of a landing hard enough to incapacitate someone. That is why I was amazed at the condition of the helo in the video. I have seen helicopters crash down hard enough to incapacitate people, and they did not end up sitting upright and spinning with the tail attached and a nice balanced rotating assembly. I have seen dynamic roll over on take off, nobody incapacitated, engine got shut down, fire extinguishers discharged as the pilot climbed out.

The video fits the tail strike while taking off, and with that the only way I see in this video they could have been killed in that scenario is by getting out with t running, but I don't see that either, although it could have been prior and they got hit by the tail or a low swoop of a blade tip.

As I said, it's just confusing at this moment.
 
Last edited:
Right, that helo crashed and the pilots were incapacitated, I can understand that. But that's not what this picture is being painted as.

Cutting the throttle on a turbine helo isn't as simple as pulling the mixture on a piston. As violently as this aircraft is spinning. He might not have been able to unlatch the throttle from idle to off or couldn't reach the fuel valve handle. Or panic ensued after the initial contact.
 
Around 40 seconds something starts happening up front, but the video on You Tube isn't clear enough to make it out.
 
OP,
Despite the other events, congrats on passing the checkride.
 
Cutting the throttle on a turbine helo isn't as simple as pulling the mixture on a piston. As violently as this aircraft is spinning. He might not have been able to unlatch the throttle from idle to off or couldn't reach the fuel valve handle. Or panic ensued after the initial contact.

Or even a heart attack. Just have to wait for more info, but man this is one of the strangest things I've seen in a while.
 
Or even a heart attack. Just have to wait for more info, but man this is one of the strangest things I've seen in a while.

Oh it's just RW aviation. Stuff happens. If this is the classic dynamic rollover situation, it's not all that uncommon. Snag a skid on the platform, panic with too much collective, aircraft rolls, blades contact asphalt, tail rotor drive shaft gets severed, aircraft spins violently.

More rare would be ground resonance. I'd probably rule that out in this case though.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0FeXjhUEXlc
 
Oh it's just RW aviation. Stuff happens. If this is the classic dynamic rollover situation, it's not all that uncommon. Snag a skid on the platform, panic with too much collective, aircraft rolls, blades contact asphalt, tail rotor drive shaft gets severed, aircraft spins violently.

More rare would be ground resonance. I'd probably rule that out in this case though.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0FeXjhUEXlc

Right, but when was the last time you saw people in the helicopter die in one of those? I've seen two roll overs on take off, and the occupants climbed out of both.:dunno:
 
Right, but when was the last time you saw people in the helicopter die in one of those? I've seen two roll overs on take off, and the occupants climbed out of both.:dunno:

I know of one personally who has a TBI from a blade imbalance on an AH-64. I also know of a pilot who was literally shaken to death during a UH-60 blade imbalance. My point wasn't to suggest ground resonance caused this since I already stated I don't believe that was the case. It was only to suggest that when it comes to RW, there are accidents that happen during modes of flight where you think you'd be safe.

This is a pretty good spin here. To say that it should have been survivable is to not understand the violence of the situation. .I had a friend who died in a crash not unlike this one. By looks of the accident you'd think it would be completely survivable. Because of his age, the blunt force trauma of being thrown around the cockpit created a brain hemorrhage / swelling while his younger student survived with minor injuries.

I don't shake my head and wonder how one could die from this. Whether it be blunt force trauma or the fire, the mechanism was there.
 
Last edited:
I also know of a pilot who was literally shaken to death during a UH-60 blade imbalance.

Exactly. Like I mentioned earlier, the eyewitness accounts of the pilots in the WILLIAM P LAWRENCE accident were like rag dolls as soon as the blade broke. Nothing they could have done and they may very well have been dead before the helo rolled over the side.
 
Sometime during the second half of the video, it looks to me like the door comes open. It's not clear, but interested if anyone else sees the same.
 
Sometime during the second half of the video, it looks to me like the door comes open. It's not clear, but interested if anyone else sees the same.

That's what it looks like and perhaps what started the story that they were intentionally trying to egress. I suspect that it was just the forces on the aircraft tearing things apart at that point.
 
Sometime during the second half of the video, it looks to me like the door comes open. It's not clear, but interested if anyone else sees the same.

Yeah, around 40 seconds you can see something white/bluish out the right front, but the video quality doesn't let me distinguish anything further.

I understand they are rotating fast, and I understand the forces involved, but you can clearly see there is no balance issue in the drive line, and to spin at that rate, requires a pretty high power setting to be maintained which you can hear. You can't say this one doesn't strike you as odd. The forces I saw in the video are not lethal without a freak circumstance.
 
Sounds like someone at the helo registration desk issued the same N-number to the guys with the same names. Clerical error. Probably thought he moved and got a new chopper, or entered the name in the computer and it generated the same number because it was already in existance. ??? Sad about the fatalities.
 
All of the arm chair quarter-backing on this thread is really a shame, especially when more than half of the posts are from pilots that have no experience flying turbine aircraft..much less a turbine helicopter. Maybe we should just wait to read official reports before judging these men on what they did or didn't do correctly.
 
All of the arm chair quarter-backing on this thread is really a shame, especially when more than half of the posts are from pilots that have no experience flying turbine aircraft..much less a turbine helicopter. Maybe we should just wait to read official reports before judging these men on what they did or didn't do correctly.

I agree but that would be out of character for some.
 
All of the arm chair quarter-backing on this thread is really a shame, especially when more than half of the posts are from pilots that have no experience flying turbine aircraft..much less a turbine helicopter. Maybe we should just wait to read official reports before judging these men on what they did or didn't do correctly.

Everyone speculates in his or her own mind as to what the cause or chain of events was that leads to a poor outcome.

Not unusual on POA for those speculations to be shared.

We all do it. You have speculations as to how it might have happened.

Right or wrong, we tend to share those here.

Everyone knows the NTSB report will reveal the "truth" but part of a flying community is discussing what might have happened in a flying accident until we get the "official" info.


What have you considered as probable links in this particular chain?
I'm certain you have some thoughts on it.
 
Yeah, around 40 seconds you can see something white/bluish out the right front, but the video quality doesn't let me distinguish anything further.

I understand they are rotating fast, and I understand the forces involved, but you can clearly see there is no balance issue in the drive line, and to spin at that rate, requires a pretty high power setting to be maintained which you can hear. You can't say this one doesn't strike you as odd. The forces I saw in the video are not lethal without a freak circumstance.

Someone on another forum calculated the rotational speed of the helicopter and translated it to G forces at the seat.

11Gs. For 8 minutes.

I'm not a physics expert but maybe somebody else can confirm, using RPM and distance from mast to seats. If the numbers work out, I can certainly seeing that force being fatal.
 
Last edited:
If I was going to speculate on what happened based on what I have read in the news and have seen in the video...They were landing on a cart that was not chocked and when they made contact with the cart, the cart started to roll forward and the pilot increased the collective pitch without applying forward cyclic resulting in the cart essentially rolling out from under them and the tail striking the ground. Without a tail rotor, and the throttle still being in flight idle, the aircraft experienced an extreme amount of torque with no way to counter its effects except to bring the throttle past the detent and cut fuel to the engine. As to what actually killed the crew, I have no idea. No matter what happened or what the pilot may have done right or wrong, my prayers are with the families. Wasn't trying to be a jackass with my last post, I just hate to see comments mentioning "these guys are recipients of the darwin award" and others like that. They are dead, and they shared the same passion as all of us do...we can atleast show some respect.
 
So I saw a video today of this incident starting about 2 minutes before rotation started. I'm gonna try not to make any judgments or speculation because all I know about helicopters is what I have viewed from the outside at the airport.

When the video started the helicopter was already hovering 2-3' off the ground, and it appeared that he was trying to land on the rolling dolley thing. With the questions about the pilots identity I cant speak with any authority on his experience level, but in the video he was definitely not stable. It was a calm day with light winds so you would expect the aircraft to be quite still in the air but it was moving around quite a bit, like someone who was either inexperienced with the aircraft or inexperienced in general and simply putting in too much input and overcorrecting. This lasted a couple minutes before there was a very quick pitch forward then back striking the tail rotor and immediately starting the spin. From there it spun quite a ways across the ramp before stabilizing into the fairly stationary spin we see in all the other videos.

Watching that video I'm glad for several things. I'm friends with some of the guys who work the ramp at CRQ. Often they are on the ramp marshalling helicopters in. Had someone been in front of them, they would be dead. When the tail struck it spun and moved straight forward in an instant. Second, all this happened right next to the parked fuel truck. Don't think I need to say more on that.
 
Someone on another forum calculated the rotational speed of the helicopter and translated it to G forces at the seat.

11Gs. For 8 minutes.

I'm not a physics expert but maybe somebody else can confirm, using RPM and distance from mast to seats. If the numbers work out, I can certainly seeing that force being fatal.

Wait, they spun there for eight minutes? It was side loading Gs, but there is a chance for that to leave them brain dead.
 
Wait, they spun there for eight minutes? It was side loading Gs, but there is a chance for that to leave them brain dead.

I don't know if it was 8, but it was definitely several minutes. Long enough for local fire crews to arrive from off airport fire stations. (airport rescue was on site as well)
 
Back
Top