- Joined
- Sep 11, 2019
- Messages
- 2,885
- Display Name
- Domenick
Luckily no one was hit with debris.
It was a prime target.

“We’ve completed our own internal review of this incident and are confident that there wasn’t an issue with the drones or the technology that supports them,”
Where did you get that the FAA is letting them ignore rules?Exactly how much money do you have to have in order to get the FAA to let you ignore their rules and follow your own instead?
Well, they had multiple drones hit a stationary object and nearly hit people on the ground. Yet the FAA didn't shut the operator down immediately.Where did you get that the FAA is letting them ignore rules?
What regulations did they violate to the level of pulling an operating certificate?Well, they had multiple drones hit a stationary object and nearly hit people on the ground. Yet the FAA didn't shut the operator down immediately.
Its my understanding that specific operation was stood down as any other operator. I think once the NTSB report is out we'll learn why they were allowed to resume ops.Yet the FAA didn't shut the operator down immediately.
If, actually true, then you need to be at least the third richest person on the planet.Exactly how much money do you have to have in order to get the FAA to let you ignore their rules and follow your own instead? ...
If, actually true, then you need to be at least the third richest person on the planet.