I would argue that "explodes" is a might dramatic...
Boeing's fault?so....
From the story, they think there was an impact with (space junk, meteor, whatever), smashing the window.I’d like to see a picture of the inside of that glass looks like. I’m not sure I’ve seen one that let projectiles loose on the inside of the cabin.
By the time the satellite hit ~35,000 feet, it would have been torn apart/scorched sufficiently to make identification difficult. Not impossible, just a real slow process. The more of the satellite left, the easier, but a larger piece would have done more damage to the Boeing.If it did hit a falling Starlink satellite, you would think it would have traded paint, and that would be the evidence.
I thought the starlinks were pretty small and would have burned up before reaching the lower atmosphere. But something hit that airplane. Probably the hawk that I just barely dodged on Friday. ;-0If it did hit a falling Starlink satellite, you would think it would have traded paint, and that would be the evidence.
‘Rubbing is racing’
Nauga, probably
The object did not penetrate the windshield, but glass fragments "exploded" from the inside surface of the glass, producing The pilots injuries. This happens when a car is hit by rocks dropped from overpasses.
From the size of the impact on not just the windshield, but the metal above it, that was a sizeable object. Years ago, the suspect would have been blue ice from a toilet.
Probably some contraband that eman tossed from his Super Mooney when he saw the space force approaching for a drug check.
Shard happens.There is a polycarbonate innermost layer that is supposed to stop the shards from happening.
I just looked it up. The starlink satellites are much larger than I thought. 500+ lbs for the small ones, about 3x that for the larger ones. For whatever reason, I thought they were much smaller.I thought the starlinks were pretty small and would have burned up before reaching the lower atmosphere. But something hit that airplane. Probably the hawk that I just barely dodged on Friday. ;-0
Oh sure. Just like Roswell.Looks like it was a weather balloon: https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/...-in-flight-it-was-probably-a-weather-balloon/
Time for ADS-B on everything.Looks like it was a weather balloon: https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/...-in-flight-it-was-probably-a-weather-balloon/
And, super notably, the protection did work quite well even in this case. Sure, it would have been cool if there had been literally no scratches on the crew, but this was still 99% a success.I've been involved with shooting at armor for decades, developing both ballistic protective windows, and opaque armor products. Bottom line: Edge hits are a b*tch.
And, super notably, the protection did work quite well even in this case. Sure, it would have been cool if there had been literally no scratches on the crew, but this was still 99% a success.
There is at least one pic out there, I saw it somewhere, but I can't figure out where I saw it. It was a pic of the Capt. showing his right arm and it shows some of the cockpit and the windscreen in the background.I’d like to see a picture of the inside of that glass looks like. I’m not sure I’ve seen one that let projectiles loose on the inside of the cabin.
There isn't much too them (a few pounds, all up) so not so much payload capacity to add much in the way of reflectors or ADS-B without upping the size of it. But without altitude reporting, radar isn't of much use.Is radar unable to see the balloons? If so, how hard would it be to add a passive radar reflector?
About 20 years ago (hopefully ATC radar is better today) we were southwest bound receiving VFR advisories at 8500', just west of Norfolk, and east of Langley VA, when I caught a glimpse of something about a half mile ahead, and climbing.Is radar unable to see the balloons? If so, how hard would it be to add a passive radar reflector?
Probably worked with the dead goose test but not so much with weather satellites.There is a polycarbonate innermost layer that is supposed to stop the shards from happening.
Dammit. Occam wins again. Space rock sounds so much cooler.
There is at least one pic out there, I saw it somewhere, but I can't figure out where I saw it. It was a pic of the Capt. showing his right arm and it shows some of the cockpit and the windscreen in the background.
It's also in the first post of this thread.That picture is on Pprune. That is where I saw the damage picture of the outside of the plane, and damage to the aluminum.
I don’t get how his right forearm got nailed ‘around the corner’ ie the aft, right part considering the windshield came at it from the front or even top left.It's also in the first post of this thread.