- Joined
- Mar 15, 2016
- Messages
- 5,585
- Display Name
- Ari
Presidents? Pshh. I prefer Chief Justices in my wallet, although I've been known to settle for Postmasters General.IMO the only presidents worth protecting is the ones in my wallet...
Presidents? Pshh. I prefer Chief Justices in my wallet, although I've been known to settle for Postmasters General.IMO the only presidents worth protecting is the ones in my wallet...
Or go to the Red Cross etc.
Even better, my understanding is that they get paid for the things that are given to them as donations. How they're allowed to collect money from the government and still be a non-profit is beyond my comprehension.The Red Cross gets paid by FEMA for all their relief efforts and the things they hand out if it is a Federally declared disaster.
Yes they re up there wasting their time because the secret service acts with near impunity when tasking mil assets for POTUS protection.Would prefer to keep this non-political, but ... yeah, I know, it's POA.
I live in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, and during Presidential visits, like this weekend, the sky is noticeably noisier (not that I mind!). Makes me curious though, what exactly are those guys doing up there? Flying a circular pattern until and unless a threat (usually a clueless Cessna pilot) shows up on radar? Switching out when it's time to refuel? (Can't imagine a need for aerial refueling when Dover AFB is minutes away.)
Indeed. And who else would pay for it?They are making the sound of freedom; alternatively, burning JP8 at tax payer expense.
As someone else stated, these sorties are a COMPLETE waste of time for fighters, absolutely zero training and at the very best nothing bad happens and your relief shows up on time.USAF pilots need hours to maintain proficiency somehow, right? What better way than to protect our nation's most treasured and collectively beloved assets?
Since the TFRs are essentially just a filtering mechanism for USSS (like only letting passengers past airport security), I assume their reasoning is that without fighters to intercept strays in a timely manner, people ignore the TFRs and they lose their effectiveness or the wind up moving the VIP off the X for no reason much more frequently.The “need” to have them up there is - unfortunately - decided by the secret service who know the square root of foxtrot alpha about air warfare. They just say “yeah, we want em“ and the dominos fall.
Since the TFRs are essentially just a filtering mechanism for USSS (like only letting passengers past airport security), I assume their reasoning is that without fighters to intercept strays in a timely manner, people ignore the TFRs and they lose their effectiveness or the wind up moving the VIP off the X for no reason much more frequently.
I can't name any of those people. I doubt many can. They're not remotely comparable to the president of the United States. I've stood next to mayors and governors of large US cities and states; the folks you refer to are much more like them.I have stood within 30 feet or so of the leaders of UAE, Oman, Bahrain and Romania (not all at the same time of course) without any security checking me at all. The President is replaceable (that’s why we have a VP). I think it’s time to end the 60-mile diameter bubble.
I can't name any of those people. I doubt many can. They're not remotely comparable to the president of the United States. I've stood next to mayors and governors of large US cities and states; the folks you refer to are much more like them.
Of course the president is replaceable; we replace him every 4-8 years. But that misses the point.
I'd bet it's even fewer than that, and yet they can all name POTUS. That's the point. He's an elected official. THE elected official. He's a symbol of our democracy. He's a target because of the meaning an attack on him would convey, and that's precisely why we protect him.How many world leaders can you name? I would guess most people can name less than 10.
The President is replaceable (that’s why we have a VP).
I remember sitting at MVY waiting while a succession if C130s left with the Clinton's support material after they had vacationed in the Vineyard and thinking how overblown the US office of the presidency had become. I guess whatever support anyone on the team requests they get and there's no challenge to the cost. No wonder there is such a disconnect from the rest of us.I was hoping to fly south from New England this Sunday the Tfr sure puts a dent in a leisurely vfr flight. One of my overnights is usually Oceancity Maryland.
You really think it would make a bit of difference?You’re frightening me.
You really think it would make a bit of difference?
It has become imperial presidency with rituals so ridiculous that would put Roman emperors to shame…I remember sitting at MVY waiting while a succession if C130s left with the Clinton's support material after they had vacationed in the Vineyard and thinking how overblown the US office of the presidency had become. I guess whatever support anyone on the team requests they get and there's no challenge to the cost. No wonder there is such a disconnect from the rest of us.
What makes you believe the propose of TFRs are to protect AF1? Basically a presidential TFR is nothing more than temporary prohibited airspace around the president.This is an apolitical comment.
The presidential TFRs are a ridiculous waste of military assets, and the disruption to aviation is nonsense. The credible chances of an airborne threat to AF1 are zero. The same odds apply for anything land based.
There aren't any rogue fighters armed with heat seeking or other types of air to air weapons roaming the skies, and the same goes for ground based anti-aircraft missile batteries. I'm sure the Yeah-But analysts will beg to differ, but really?
I'd bet it's even fewer than that, and yet they can all name POTUS. That's the point. He's an elected official. THE elected official. He's a symbol of our democracy. He's a target because of the meaning an attack on him would convey, and that's precisely why we protect him.
it is WAAAAY faster to run over to the tanker to get some gas than going into Dover where they don’t have any ground personnel trained to dearm fighters with live weapons or to hot pit refuel fighters. Having a tanker up there saves from having other fighters there to cover while the first two land somewhere to refuel. If you are on the tanker you can still get to a “threat” within the response time required by the secret service.
I'll bet most of them also know who POTUS is. Yet no one here knows who the Sultan is. Everyone in France knows who their prime minister is. No one here or in Oman does. But the French all know Biden. Everyone in Sweden knows who their president is. No one here or in Oman or France does. But they all know POTUS.....Everyone in Oman knows who the Sultan is. He is a symbol of the country, the Ruler, yet they let me stand a very short distance away with no security check of me.
This was in about 1994 when Qaboos bin Said Al Said was Sultan.
Does current POTUS know who he is ? I am not so sure .. at least on some days.I'll bet most of them also know who POTUS is. Yet no one here knows who the Sultan is. Everyone in France knows who their prime minister is. No one here or in Oman does. But the French all know Biden. Everyone in Sweden knows who their president is. No one here or in Oman or France does. But they all know POTUS.....
I'll bet most of them also know who POTUS is. Yet no one here knows who the Sultan is. Everyone in France knows who their prime minister is. No one here or in Oman does. But the French all know Biden. Everyone in Sweden knows who their president is. No one here or in Oman or France does. But they all know POTUS.....
I know I’m the retired guy now but when I was the FS/CC less than 4 years ago, we NEVER put FOL or ground crew out people at a non-tactical base like Dover. it just doesn’t make sense. Barnes could turn us if we really needed to land, but I don’t think the OP understands the extra footprint required to “just land”.Figher units train for FOL operations. They put a ground crew needed to dearm and turn aircraft where they need them.
Yes, if on the tanker, they can still in the air for response.
Because nothing precludes that? There's a big misconception on the what "non-profit" means. 501(c)(3) Charities (of which the Red Cross is) has specific rules as to what they can take in versus what/how they pay out. Nothing says they can't charge for services.Even better, my understanding is that they get paid for the things that are given to them as donations. How they're allowed to collect money from the government and still be a non-profit is beyond my comprehension.
That makes perfect sense. Charitable as defined by the IRS, not charitable as defined by the English language.Because nothing precludes that? There's a big misconception on the what "non-profit" means. 501(c)(3) Charities (of which the Red Cross is) has specific rules as to what they can take in versus what/how they pay out. Nothing says they can't charge for services.
Man we need more of those across alot of stuff.....This is an apolitical comment.
Because I can make the connection between "prohibited airspace around the president" and threats to Air Force 1. It wasn't hard to do.What makes you believe the propose of TFRs are to protect AF1? Basically a presidential TFR is nothing more than temporary prohibited airspace around the president.
Re the story, I feel bad for the guy. He was probably just trying to bring them a birthday present.We have had our fair share of POTUS TFRs' in the Los Angeles area, and a friend of mine at N57 tells me that life is a little hard when Biden heads home to Wilmington. But I will say it is kind of cool to see AF1 and Marine 1 fluttering about. Sitting on the beach in Ventucky we could catch Reagan heading up the coast from Pt Mugu to his ranch in Santa Barbara, and I have gotten caught in many a traffic jam when Obama would come to town... Politics aside, it is pretty impressive when you see it.
Even when they do something at the Regan Library (recent debate), KCMA loads up with all kinds of "beep-you money" toys, and black limos, etc...... Not a TFR, but nonetheless.
But the best was reading about this... I wonder what the blood test readings were on this guy.
![]()
Cessna 182 Carrying Marijuana Intercepted in Obama Airspace
A Cessna 182 allegedly carrying approximately 40 pounds of marijuana was intercepted by F-16s on Thursday after busting restricted airspace shared by Marinewww.flyingmag.com
Re the story, I feel bad for the guy. He was probably just trying to bring them a birthday present.
If you want to look closely at the current TFR you will discover it is not centered on an airport. It is centered on the Biden residence. So unless AF1 is parked in his front yard…..Because I can make the connection between "prohibited airspace around the president" and threats to Air Force 1. It wasn't hard to do.
Every president's non-DC residence has had a TFR or P area over it. We only really escaped too much influence with Obama and Trump because they tended to hang out in the middle of class B airspace when not in DC.
I think you are safe.And for this reason, I will never vote for a candidate from Northern Nevada.