Plane + Pilot - Big Changes

Driving my Dodge on I4 would be safer if I wore my racing nomex and helmet, and equipped the car with a 5 point harness and a padded rollcage and a window net and a fire suppression system.

There's always a trade between safety and matters like practicality and expense.
One of my long-ago bosses used to rag me about not wearing a parachute when I flew.

Then he got in a car accident where his head banged against the top of the doorframe (before air bags). Got a pretty bad concussion.

Ron Wanttaja
 
I know of people who still religiously wear their N95 masks, who did not wear masks before the pandemic. And I still occasionally see folks wearing a mask while driving as the sole occupant of the car. At least they're (presumably) not doing it to look cool. I say that because for many GA pilots who wear helmets, it's less about feeling safe and more about feeling like Top Gun. Example: the guy who had his Skymaster painted to mimic an O-2. He'd put on his mil-surplus bag with some patches sewn on, don his helmet and visor, and fly around the county directing airstrikes and searching for covert VC activity (I guess). He must have been effective, because we never suffered a single loss to enemy forces. And he is not alone.

In so many cases (including certain "warbirds" like the fearsome T-34), the helmet-wearing pilot fancies himself thusly:

1768350052388.png

But all I see is:

ChatGPT Image Jan 12, 2026, 10_35_28 AM.png

(Actually, this comparison is very unfair to Mike Dukakis)

But hey--it is YOUR melon, and I'm just SAHOTI.
 
In so many cases (including certain "warbirds" like the fearsome T-34)...

I love to get after those guys too. I always call them a "less capable Bonanza" since mine (Bonanza) can carry 6 and they can only carry 2.

But... if I'm in one wearing a parachute, you can bet I'll have a helmet on too.
 
…But... if I'm in one wearing a parachute, you can bet I'll have a helmet on too.
That makes sense. I think at that point the decisions become bump lid or full helmet and with or without integrated eye pro.

I mean if your day is going badly enough to have to step out of the plane, why risk a TBI, especially if it’s your first jump.
 
 
Helmet on: bicycling; motorcycling; sailing in challenging conditions when I have to leave the cockpit (bicycle helmet); playing on stage at Bob's Country Bunker.

Helmet off: flying airplanes and gliders, with or without parachute.
 
Back on topic, sort of, AvBrief.com is run by FireCrown, isn't it?
These links came in my email, but they seem to have reasonable information.
This one does push the author's book a bit but it has useful information:

This seems like a good idea- flagging temporary hardware during a build:

What does @wanttaja think of this? Was there a fair payment?
 
Thanks for bringing up Libby. I'd forgotten about it.

This issue of P+P is all about the mountain West. The next one is about Texas. Sounds like maybe they're trying to recreate something of Pilot Getaways. We'll see.

I wonder about the future of written communication. Newspapers have been replaced by X. Forums like this are largely dead, replaced by Facebook groups (PoA and BT are exceptions, but they're both worse than they used to be). Paper magazines are nearly unheard of. Is there a market for the content that used to go into actual magazines? How should it be distributed?
BT?

I still get physical copies of the New Yorker, Nat Geo, & Our state. New Yorker is a great mag, but the days when they'd serialize a book (ie Caro's "Master of the Senate", McPhee's stuff, playing doc's games, etc) are long gone.

Loss of newspapers leads to a less informed public. The hyperpolarization of "reality"-with a sitting cabinet head endorsing chemtrail conspiracy. Same cabinet head saying "do you own research"
You can't research everything comprehensively.
Senator Kennedy, my name is Emily, and my biggest concern is the stratospheric aerosol injections that are continuously peppered on us every day. Bromium aluminum structure, strontium, it’s sprayed in.

DR. PHIL: Our skies all day long.

ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.: And I know you’ve talked to Dane Wigginton about this. He seems to be one of the experts in the field.

DR. PHIL: Is there a question? Yes.

ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.: How do we stop it? That is not happening in my agency. We don’t do that. It’s done, we think, by darpa. And a lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel. You know, those materials are put in jet fuel. We. I’m going to do everything in my power to stop it. We’re bringing on somebody who’s going to think only about that. Find out who’s doing it and holding them accountable.

We have cabinet heads spouting ludicrous lies (such as above-aviation related) , with no mention of this by entire powerful outlets favored by our government. Fox puts up long pieces on "chemtrails and geoengineering with "the other side" of the "argument" being that unnamed "experts" "insist no evidence" that chemtrails/geoengineering is happening.

Some insist ‘no evidence’​

Experts, including those from Harvard University, have previously confirmed that aerosol injection technologies are not in use and are theoretical — saying they would be highly visible.
 
Back on topic, sort of, AvBrief.com is run by FireCrown, isn't it?
No. Firecrown bought AvWeb. Just like at Kitplanes, most of the Avweb staff quit when Firecrown came in and one of them (Russ Niles) started AvBrief in competition, with a "no AI" promise. AvBrief also added their "Experimental Aviator" section, which has attracted many of the former Kitplanes contributors.
 
BT?

I still get physical copies of the New Yorker, Nat Geo, & Our state. New Yorker is a great mag, but the days when they'd serialize a book (ie Caro's "Master of the Senate", McPhee's stuff, playing doc's games, etc) are long gone.

Loss of newspapers leads to a less informed public. The hyperpolarization of "reality"-with a sitting cabinet head endorsing chemtrail conspiracy. Same cabinet head saying "do you own research"
You can't research everything comprehensively.


We have cabinet heads spouting ludicrous lies (such as above-aviation related) , with no mention of this by entire powerful outlets favored by our government. Fox puts up long pieces on "chemtrails and geoengineering with "the other side" of the "argument" being that unnamed "experts" "insist no evidence" that chemtrails/geoengineering is happening.
famous story about jos mitchell coming into office of nyer everyday from 9-5 for 29 years without writing a story
 
famous story about jos mitchell coming into office of nyer everyday from 9-5 for 29 years without writing a story
I didn't know that! Just found it, interesting. Thanks
 
What does @wanttaja think of this? Was there a fair payment?
As Dana said, AvBrief is not a Firecrown publication.

I was asked if I could contribute to AvBrief, and I suggested I had some older articles I'd written for my Fly Baby web page or my EAA Chapter newsletter that might work for them with a bit of reworking. Didn't take much time to modify it for the new media home. The payment I received was appropriate for a second printing. But like most of us writers here, I don't depend on my writing income to hold body and soul together. I try to make enough to cover hangar costs for the Fly Baby; easier to justify it to the wife (who is ALSO a published writer). Between book royalties and article payments, I mostly break even. For most of us, I think it's professional pride: If they PAY you for the article, you're a professional writer. I have written for free for startups led by friends, but that's different.

As Dana also mentioned, much of the former staff of Kitplanes and AvWeb have gravitated to AvBrief. I had a good working relationship with them, and when they asked for some content to help them get started, I was happy to oblige. Two of the former staffers keep their planes in the next hangar row at my new home airport, and we're members of the same EAA Chapter.

Will mention that I haven't severed relationships with the "new" Kitplanes. While I loathe what Firecrown has done to the magazines they now own, I think the editor is fighting a hard battle. Just prior to the blowup, I submitted a Zip file containing several more of my "Yesterday's Homebuilts" shorts. None of them ever appeared. I contacted the new editor, he couldn't find them, and was interested in continuing the series. I sent them to him, and received a payment notice from Firecrown a couple of days ago. My attitude is that the situation is *not* the new editor's fault, and I wasn't going to take things out on him. I'm a freelancer, I don't grudges unless I'm personally affected.

"Why not pick up the series at AvBrief, instead?" Sure, it'd have made sense. But I wasn't sure if I was going to consider the series, and it would have made sense to keep it at its original publication. One item was a bit longer, and I did submit it separately to AvBrief. Hopefully, they'll be running "A Whale of a Tale" in a month or so. But I *did* submit a lot to them, they're probably stretching things out a bit.

There is...ummm....another reason I took this approach. Back when I first started writing, I sent an article in to another publication (Plane and Pilot, in fact, I think). Didn't hear a darn thing about it. Ah, well, the life of a freelancer.

Two years later, a fellow EAA member came back from a trip. "Congratulations!" he told me.

I rose to my usual level of wit. "Huh?"

"Well, being an Associate Editor of a magazine is a pretty big deal, right?"

He handed me a copy of a new regional aviation magazine. There was the article I'd sent to Plane and Pilot, and my name listed in the masthead as one of the staffers. The editor had left Plane and Pilot, and had taken all the submitted articles with him. I'd received no notification, no updates. Took me about ten months, but I finally did get payment for the article. Like I said, a professional writer is one who gets paid.

One guess on who that editor was......

In any case, thinking of switching the "Yesterday's Homebuilts" series to another magazine reminded me too much of my previous experience.

Ron Wanttaja
 
No. Firecrown bought AvWeb. Just like at Kitplanes, most of the Avweb staff quit when Firecrown came in and one of them (Russ Niles) started AvBrief in competition, with a "no AI" promise. AvBrief also added their "Experimental Aviator" section, which has attracted many of the former Kitplanes contributors.
As Dana said, AvBrief is not a Firecrown publication.
Thanks for the clarification. @Dana Your explanation explained a lot of things- it looked so much like the good articles from KitPlanes that it confused me.
 
Really enjoyed that Kingdome piece in avbrief that @Cap'n Jack linked above, @wanttaja .

Unlikely to happen, but I’d love to see someone pay you for a piece where you track down that “bravest man” . Now I want to know if he’s still flying.
 
Example: the guy who had his Skymaster painted to mimic an O-2. He'd put on his mil-surplus bag with some patches sewn on, don his helmet and visor, and fly around the county directing airstrikes and searching for covert VC activity (I guess). He must have been effective, because we never suffered a single loss to enemy forces.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

472530717_10170659134515105_5142558410200069392_n.jpg

Back on topic, sort of, AvBrief.com is run by FireCrown, isn't it?
No, AvBrief is run by the folks that fled from AvWeb when FireCrown bought AvWeb, which is why AvBrief doesn't suck.

One guess on who that editor was......
Oh jeez. Gotta be the one and only Capt. Zoom. :rolleyes:
 
I say that because for many GA pilots who wear helmets, it's less about feeling safe and more about feeling like Top Gun. Example: the guy who had his Skymaster painted to mimic an O-2. He'd put on his mil-surplus bag with some patches sewn on, don his helmet and visor, and fly around the county directing airstrikes and searching for covert VC activity (I guess). He must have been effective, because we never suffered a single loss to enemy forces.
Does seem a bit excessive.

Me, I just painted a fake cockpit on the belly of my airplane in case I ever engage any Canadian F-18s.

Ron Wanttaja
 
Does seem a bit excessive.

Me, I just painted a fake cockpit on the belly of my airplane in case I ever engage any Canadian F-18s.

Ron Wanttaja
Very convincing. But you forgot to add “the birdie.”
 
As Dana said, AvBrief is not a Firecrown publication.

I was asked if I could contribute to AvBrief, and I suggested I had some older articles I'd written for my Fly Baby web page or my EAA Chapter newsletter that might work for them with a bit of reworking. Didn't take much time to modify it for the new media home. The payment I received was appropriate for a second printing. But like most of us writers here, I don't depend on my writing income to hold body and soul together. I try to make enough to cover hangar costs for the Fly Baby; easier to justify it to the wife (who is ALSO a published writer). Between book royalties and article payments, I mostly break even. For most of us, I think it's professional pride: If they PAY you for the article, you're a professional writer. I have written for free for startups led by friends, but that's different.

As Dana also mentioned, much of the former staff of Kitplanes and AvWeb have gravitated to AvBrief. I had a good working relationship with them, and when they asked for some content to help them get started, I was happy to oblige. Two of the former staffers keep their planes in the next hangar row at my new home airport, and we're members of the same EAA Chapter.

Will mention that I haven't severed relationships with the "new" Kitplanes. While I loathe what Firecrown has done to the magazines they now own, I think the editor is fighting a hard battle. Just prior to the blowup, I submitted a Zip file containing several more of my "Yesterday's Homebuilts" shorts. None of them ever appeared. I contacted the new editor, he couldn't find them, and was interested in continuing the series. I sent them to him, and received a payment notice from Firecrown a couple of days ago. My attitude is that the situation is *not* the new editor's fault, and I wasn't going to take things out on him. I'm a freelancer, I don't grudges unless I'm personally affected.

"Why not pick up the series at AvBrief, instead?" Sure, it'd have made sense. But I wasn't sure if I was going to consider the series, and it would have made sense to keep it at its original publication. One item was a bit longer, and I did submit it separately to AvBrief. Hopefully, they'll be running "A Whale of a Tale" in a month or so. But I *did* submit a lot to them, they're probably stretching things out a bit.

There is...ummm....another reason I took this approach. Back when I first started writing, I sent an article in to another publication (Plane and Pilot, in fact, I think). Didn't hear a darn thing about it. Ah, well, the life of a freelancer.

Two years later, a fellow EAA member came back from a trip. "Congratulations!" he told me.

I rose to my usual level of wit. "Huh?"

"Well, being an Associate Editor of a magazine is a pretty big deal, right?"

He handed me a copy of a new regional aviation magazine. There was the article I'd sent to Plane and Pilot, and my name listed in the masthead as one of the staffers. The editor had left Plane and Pilot, and had taken all the submitted articles with him. I'd received no notification, no updates. Took me about ten months, but I finally did get payment for the article. Like I said, a professional writer is one who gets paid.

One guess on who that editor was......

In any case, thinking of switching the "Yesterday's Homebuilts" series to another magazine reminded me too much of my previous experience.

Ron Wanttaja
I used to dream of being a writer. It all seemed so romantic and noble. But now those dreams are hopelessly shattered. Fortunately I still have booze and cigarettes and a tattered old tweed jacket with clashing bowtie.
 
You need a Royal typewriter.
Not anymore.

After reading through this thread, I pawned my Smith Corona and my scroll of 120 foot long paper. Bought me a quart of hooch and a pack of Chesterfields. If I’d had a Royal or Underwood, I could have gotten enough money for a pipe, like Faulkner and Hemingway.
 
Last edited:
Not anymore.

After reading through this thread, I pawned my Smith Corona and my scroll of 120 foot long paper. Bought me a quart of hooch and a pack of Chesterfields. If I’d had a Royal or Underwood, I could have gotten enough money for a pipe, like Faulkner and Hemingway.

Faulkner and Hemingway are too high falutin’. Try a cheap cigar. Works well for hard boiled crime fiction.
 
Faulkner and Hemingway are too high falutin’. Try a cheap cigar. Works well for hard boiled crime fiction.
IMG_5878.jpeg
Can’t get much more high-falutin’ than Dostoyevsky nor hardboiled than Crime and Punishnent (which served as an inspiration for the creators of Columbo). But I’ll skip the cheap cigar just the same.

Interesting to consider what an aviation magazine could be with writers like Hemingway, Faulkner, and Dostoyevsky. Hemingway survived two crashes, and wrote one of my favorite aviation quotes: “It is appearances, characteristics and performance that make a man love an airplane, and they, are what put emotion into one. You love a lot of things if you live around them, but there isn't any woman and there isn't any horse, nor any before nor any after, that is as lovely as a great airplane, and men who love them are faithful to them even though they leave them for others. A man has only one virginity to lose in fighters, and if it is a lovely plane he loses it to, there his heart will ever be.” Faulkner was a GA pilot who wrote a short story and two solid novels featuring aviation. Dostoyevsky could transform the sad saga of aviation publishing that runs through this thread into a masterful examination of the human condition. But now, we just have AI.
 
David Mamet wrote great columns for Flying only to be axed by the new editor who didn’t
like his politics
 
David Mamet wrote great columns for Flying only to be axed by the new editor who didn’t
like his politics
Being political on either side you run the risk of alienating half your readers. Sometimes it's best to not poke that bear. Or cut ties with those that feel compelled to.
 
There was never a word of politics in the Flying aritcles. Pure aviation. And brilliant
 
David Mamet wrote great columns for Flying only to be axed by the new editor who didn’t
like his politics
Having not read Flying in decades, that comes as a surprise. I might have picked-up a copy if I had known.

How do you know it was Mamet’s politics, instead of his fee?
 
Not gonna bother with FireCrown. They take your money and then don’t deliver the magazines. Crooks.
I’ve had the same issue - I haven’t received my last 2 months of Flying magazine and their customer service is very unresponsive to inquiries. I’m not sure it’s worth renewing at this point, which is unfortunate. I’ve been a longtime Flying magazine subscriber.
 
Having not read Flying in decades, that comes as a surprise. I might have picked-up a copy if I had known.

How do you know it was Mamet’s politics, instead of his fee?
Because his fee did not increase.
 
Because his fee did not increase.
Oh. Mr. Mamet, I didn’t realize you were active on this board. Perhaps you could speed-the-plow over at the new P + P. By pilots, for pilots (and vice versa).
 
Reminds me of when helmets became a thing for snow skiing/boarding and people were made fun of for wearing them at first.
After skiing for a few decades, I didn't think a helmet was necessary, until I hit a patch of shaded ice, which resulted in a toboggan and ambulance ride, a concussion, and a couple days of befuddlement.

When I recovered the ability to think straight again, I reconsidered my position on the subject.

:biggrin:
 
Back
Top