Over/Under Covid 19 deaths in US

Discussion in 'Hangar Talk' started by lowtimer, Mar 25, 2020.

?

Over/Under Covid 19 deaths 2020

  1. More than 25K

    55 vote(s)
    68.8%
  2. Less than 25K

    25 vote(s)
    31.3%
  1. lowtimer

    lowtimer Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    175
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Lowtimer
    What do you think, will Covid 19 kill more or less than 25K people in the US in 2020.
     
  2. lowtimer

    lowtimer Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    175
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Lowtimer
    If you think the over under number is way off what number do you think the "bookies" would handicap this at?
     
  3. asicer

    asicer En-Route

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    4,958
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    asicer
    Do the bookies give you a discount on the vig if you are diagnosed with it?
     
  4. Tantalum

    Tantalum Final Approach

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2017
    Messages:
    5,266
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    San_Diego_Pilot
    We are still just at the start of this with thousands of new cases each day.. even if we don't fully trust China's figures we do know that they had some very strict lockdown measures in place. We don't have anything like that here in the US. This will continue to spread until there's some form of herd immunity or a vaccine
     
    MIFlyer and wayneda40 like this.
  5. lowtimer

    lowtimer Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    175
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Lowtimer
    I was thinking more like Las Vegas sports book bookies, but I guess with the casinos shut down they gotta make a living. I don't know about discounts on the vig, but miss a payment and Guido comes by and infects your Grandma.
     
  6. SoonerAviator

    SoonerAviator Final Approach PoA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2014
    Messages:
    5,208
    Location:
    Broken Arrow, OK
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    SoonerAviator
    Hard to say, I'm guessing less than 25K deaths, but it's probably because we aren't seeing the impact as much here locally (one of the benefits of being in a flyover state).
     
  7. schmookeeg

    schmookeeg Pattern Altitude

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,565
    Location:
    Hipsterdelphia PDX
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Mike Brannigan
    Whatever the bookie number is, I'd like some sort of "score" which multiplies the body count by their average presumptive years of life remaining.
     
    MIFlyer likes this.
  8. FormerHangie

    FormerHangie En-Route

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2,996
    Location:
    Roswell, GA
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    FormerHangie
    It's just a matter of time.
     
  9. SoonerAviator

    SoonerAviator Final Approach PoA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2014
    Messages:
    5,208
    Location:
    Broken Arrow, OK
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    SoonerAviator
    True, but given a long enough span of time, the impact to health care is greatly reduced. I just think we’ll hit the peak of the rate increases within a week and hopefully see the curve flatten after that. I may be too optimistic, but even the experts don’t have much of a crystal ball on this one.
     
  10. jbarrass

    jbarrass Line Up and Wait

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    692
    Location:
    Vienna, VA
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    jbarrass
    The debate is wether it’s worse than the flu. So shouldn’t the number be 57,000?
     
  11. NoHeat

    NoHeat En-Route

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,887
    Location:
    Iowa City, IA
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    17
    100k to 200k is my guess, if I'm allowed a range.

    For sure I think it will exceed 37k. Here's why.

    Italy is a couple of weeks ahead of the US. Italy has 7500 deaths, which is increasing 10% each day. Italy also has 1/5 the population of the US. Multiply 7500 * 5 = 37k. I think it's unlikely we control the spread so much better than Italy that our death rate diminishes to 0% at that point, versus their 10%.
     
    MIFlyer, wayneda40 and Brad Z like this.
  12. TCABM

    TCABM Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2013
    Messages:
    1,449
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    3G
    So, less than medical errors annually.
     
  13. NoHeat

    NoHeat En-Route

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,887
    Location:
    Iowa City, IA
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    17
    Maybe so.

    But on the other hand, it could be anywhere up to 2.2 million. That's the scenario if we're ineffective in stopping the spread: 66% of the population infected (which Angela Merkel mentioned as the unsuccessful-scenario for Germany). Assuming the 1% death rate that scientists are now estimating, multiplying 66% * 329 million * 1% = 2.2 million.

    For comparison, that worst-case scenario death toll is about 3.5X greater than the deaths due to cancer annually.
     
  14. cowman

    cowman En-Route

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2012
    Messages:
    4,218
    Location:
    Danger Zone
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Cowman
    I don't mean to be callous but when dealing with things on a nationwide or worldwide scale you kind of have to take the humanity out of it to really put anything into a meaningful perspective.

    On a national scale, 25,000 deaths isn't that much. A quick google search tells me 647,000 people die from heart disease in the US every year.
     
    skier, TCABM and Ted DuPuis like this.
  15. luvflyin

    luvflyin Final Approach

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    Messages:
    7,517
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Luvflyin
    Ah. Betting.
     
  16. Ted DuPuis

    Ted DuPuis Administrator Management Council Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    26,114
    Location:
    Paola, KS
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    #bandozer
    Italy is also more congested on the whole than the US and has a higher elderly population.

    But, I would agree with @cowman that 25k deaths is really not much in the grand scheme of things - 37k is how many die in car crashes every year on US roads roughly.
     
    TCABM likes this.
  17. DavidWhite

    DavidWhite Final Approach

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    6,433
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    VBP
    Nasty bug, our bungled response along with our broken system will ensure deaths in the 6 figure range, possibly 7. I would ask all the naysayers to picture your parents, grandparents, or yourself with a tube sticking out of their throat having bloody pus and plegm pumped out, and the only thing keeping them alive being a ventilator. I saw a COVID-19 patient today being loaded on to one of our airplanes and that was his reality. It could be yours too.
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2020
  18. Stewartb

    Stewartb Final Approach

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2014
    Messages:
    6,353
    Location:
    Wasilla, AK
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    stewartb
    Lowtimer has a very low IQ. I hope we meet.
     
    lowtimer likes this.
  19. GRG55

    GRG55 Final Approach

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2015
    Messages:
    7,524
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Aztec Flyer
    An estimated ~7500 people die on average every day in the USA from all causes.

    If fatalities from Covid-19 are limited to 25,000 it will mean:
    a) the social distancing, hand washing and economic MOABing were truly effective; or
    b) #19 isn't nearly as broadly virulent across the whole population as we imagined.

    We will find out in due course.
     
  20. Datadriver

    Datadriver Line Up and Wait

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    718
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Datadriver
    The Diamond Princess cruise ship was almost the perfect lab experiment. With zero social distancing they had:
    - 3700 total people
    - 3081 not infected (84%)
    - 619 infected (16%)
    - 6 deaths (just under 1%)

    If we are going to cause another great depression that will last 10 years and cost $100 trillion dollars in lost GDP we might want to look at multiple datapoints.

    We probably should also discount public officials who said 2 weeks ago their state CURRENTLY had 100,000 cases of covid-19
    https://thehill.com/policy/healthca...mates-100000-people-in-state-have-coronavirus

    when 2 weeks LATER the actual number is...704
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2020 at 12:02 AM
    MuseChaser, TCABM and Groundpounder like this.
  21. Datadriver

    Datadriver Line Up and Wait

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    718
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Datadriver
    *OR*, we had huge natural immunity in the population (84% on Diamond Princess cruise ship).

    Interestingly, we might see a lower number of flu deaths and other diseases this year due to the social distancing, a nice bonus.
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2020
  22. kkoran

    kkoran Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,464
    Location:
    Renton, WA
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Kent
    Trick question. It's going to be exactly 25,000.
     
    Sinistar, skier and DavidWhite like this.
  23. luvflyin

    luvflyin Final Approach

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    Messages:
    7,517
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Luvflyin
    84% natural immunity? That’s good news. Source?
     
  24. Datadriver

    Datadriver Line Up and Wait

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    718
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Datadriver
    By projecting the last 7 days data we hit 25,000 dead by mid-April, with 528,000 dead by
    https://lmgtfy.com/?q=diamond+princess+covid+19

    There are multiple "studies", the numbers vary slightly between the reports.
     
  25. Datadriver

    Datadriver Line Up and Wait

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    718
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Datadriver
    247 deaths since yesterday, if that grows at 30% each day we hit 25000 in 20 days. Hope it slows.
     
  26. DavidWhite

    DavidWhite Final Approach

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    6,433
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    VBP
    It will get much worse once the major metropolitan areas hospitals are overwhelmed.

    edit: that is where Italy saw their fatality rate start to skyrocket.
     
  27. DavidWhite

    DavidWhite Final Approach

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    6,433
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    VBP
    I am reminded of an old riddle I really like.

    "In a lake, there is a patch of lily pads. Every day, the patch doubles in size. If it takes 48 days for the patch to cover the entire lake, how long would it take for the patch to cover half the lake?"
     
    wayneda40 and azure like this.
  28. Morgan3820

    Morgan3820 Pattern Altitude

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,954
    Location:
    New Bern, NC
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Reno
    Yeah but culturally Italy and China have smaller personal spaces. Americans were already practicing social distancing to some degree. Early on in one of the treads I predicted less than 20K. If I turn out to be right in that prediction, I will be sure to dig up the thread and gloat :)
     
  29. Groundpounder

    Groundpounder Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2013
    Messages:
    1,209
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Amanda Hugandkiss
    More people are going to be affected in a negative manner due to the financial panic than the actual virus itself.
     
    Katamarino, Datadriver, skier and 2 others like this.
  30. TCABM

    TCABM Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2013
    Messages:
    1,449
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    3G
    I’m well aware of the estimates. The thing about models is that while the math is easy, the assumptions behind the models are limited by the knowledge available to make those assumptions.

    While we’re learning more about this bug each and every day, we still know very little about it. And no one is willing to discuss the assumptions behind the models and whether those assumptions are being updated based on new knowledge gained or the impact of innovation gaps that get closed.
     
    SoonerAviator and Datadriver like this.
  31. azure

    azure Final Approach

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Messages:
    8,233
    Location:
    Varmint Country
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    azure
    The answer, of course, is 47 days.
     
  32. azure

    azure Final Approach

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Messages:
    8,233
    Location:
    Varmint Country
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    azure
    The one big unknown in all of these estimates is how many people are infected without knowing it, without developing anything more serious than cold symptoms at worst.

    Brian quoted an article from Financial Times on his board that argues that the fraction of total infected people is so high that we we may already have substantial herd immunity in the population. The article was based on an epidemiological study done in the UK and hasn't been replicated elsewhere to my knowledge. It's paywalled, but I will try to find the link for those that can read it.

    All this with the disclaimer that this is highly speculative, and could be entirely wrong.
     
    Datadriver likes this.
  33. Kenny Phillips

    Kenny Phillips En-Route

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2018
    Messages:
    3,216
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Kenny Phillips
    Of course. But recovery can be made in a different way than Congress has outlined. But it won't be; they don't trust We, the People.
    If, however, you are saying that it would have been better to just let this thing run wild, I beg to differ.
     
    deonb likes this.
  34. asicer

    asicer En-Route

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    4,958
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    asicer
    I wouldn't say they had "zero social distancing". One infected person boarded the ship on Jan 20 and disembarked on Jan 25. I don't the original itinerary or whether they rotated passengers after that, but a week later 10 people were diagnosed and the ship immediately went into quarantine. Therefore, I don't think you can attribute the 84% to immunity as it's more likely due to the quarantine. It's also my understanding that their lockdown was even more restrictive than what we're seeing in the CONUS today. If anything your data would seem to support more restrictions, not less since you would have to match the conditions on the ship to achieve the same numerical outcome.

    But then again, I'm not an epidemiologist and it sounds like you aren't either. I'll defer to the experts and advise that you do so as well. I'm sure they'd probably look at this discussion the same way a pilot would watch a really bad movie about airplanes.
     
    Datadriver, wayneda40 and deonb like this.
  35. Juliet Hotel

    Juliet Hotel Pattern Altitude

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2018
    Messages:
    1,661
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Juliet Hotel
    Zero social distancing? Didn't they restrict everyone to their cabins as soon as they started seeing confirmed cases?
     
    Tantalum, flyingcheesehead and deonb like this.
  36. KSCessnaDriver

    KSCessnaDriver Pattern Altitude

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2008
    Messages:
    2,106
    Location:
    C62
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    KSCessnaDriver
    No, 2 weeks later the confirmed positive is 704. There is absolutely no way to know the total number of cases anywhere at this point. So I take it you're in favor of opening everything up today then?
     
  37. Datadriver

    Datadriver Line Up and Wait

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    718
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Datadriver
    More math:
    - 330 million in US
    - assume 84% immune
    - assume 100% of the 16% not immune get infected
    - assume 1% fatal rate

    We would top out at 528,000 fatals.
    Don't try and fit me into a "denier" vs an "alarmist" category. *ALL* I am saying is that the alarmists are cherry picking the worst possible models upon which to base their ENTIRE approach.
     
  38. asicer

    asicer En-Route

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    4,958
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    asicer
    You keep saying that word "immune". I do not think it means what you think it means.
     
    Juliet Hotel, deonb and overdrive148 like this.
  39. MooneyDriver78

    MooneyDriver78 En-Route

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,812
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Tom
    We should be asking the younger healthy people to socialize, if they infect each other, they will have immunity and will reduce the spread of the virus. Technical term is “herd immunity”.
     
  40. luvflyin

    luvflyin Final Approach

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    Messages:
    7,517
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Luvflyin
    I don’t think it works like that. Being immune doesn’t mean you can’t transmit. You’re less likely to from coughing because you are not coughing as much because you didn’t get sick. But if you touch something with the virus your ‘immunity’ does not stop the virus from sticking to your hand and getting transferred to the next thing you touch.
     
    deonb likes this.