- Joined
- Jul 3, 2012
- Messages
- 15,222
- Display Name
Display name:
Velocity173
Why do you need $450,000 and dozens of pink shirts when all it takes is one Roncachamp and a handheld radio. Pay the guy 10 grand for the whole event and be done with it.
Gee, it must be that three-decade lie the pink shirts have promulgated on us, about how they all "volunteered" and "competed" to work at Airventure?
All they "volunteered" for was to find a slick way to get paid overtime to attend Airventure. Nice.
I guess I should have known that a "civil servant" would never do anything out of charity?
EAA needs an abandoned air base. There is one North of here (in Texas) that is completely uncontrolled, and has an 11,000' runway. It would be perfect for Airventure.
Your head may just explode when you find out that the 2.2 million active and reserve soldiers of our all-volunteer military get pay checks too...and nice pensions...
No more free stays for those greedy bastards, I presume?
There would still be RVs that couldn't hit the green dot. :wink2:
What's funny, is that will prolly be me this year. We take delivery of our -8A next week, and start transition training immediately, weather permitting.
It's my turn to fly in to OSH this year. When you see the Ferrari red RV-8A floating, and floating, and floating, 1000' past that green dot, y'all feel free to wave!
"Stay clear of Class D"? Really?
I think not.
Would it be a smaller Airventure? No doubt. Would it be worth it, in the long run?
Yep.
This is a TERRIBLE precedent to set. We will never hear the end of user's fees now.
Comparing civil servant bureaucrats to our professional, all-volunteer military is an insult to everyone who wears the uniform
Two years ago I double shifted on the Flightline on the Saturday or Sunday before opening Monday, and spent 6 hours within 50 feet of the green dot. One of the most fun days in my aviation career, and the only thing I flew that day was my F-150.
My trip to OSH was pretty iffy this year. This may be a good year to "vote with my dollars" and go enjoy something else. That or tow a trailer out to Scholler instead of flying in, but that seems like a cop-out.
Comparing every controller wearing a pink shirt to civil servant bureaucrats is pretty insulting, too-- especially considering that a lot of them were wearing military uniforms prior to their civil employment.
But, at least you've acknowledged that you DO understand that the word "volunteer" can mean different things in different situations. Now, how about admitting that you've actually learned a other few things in this thread as well? For example:
1. That Oshkosh controllers still don't get paid at overtime rates, no matter how many times you argue that they do.
2. That they do compete for those much coveted positions, just as you've always believed.
3. That their incentive to bid the job has everything to do with airplanes, and nothing to do with avarice.
4. That the prohibition that prevents them from working without pay is determined and enforced by FAA management (and their Congressional overloads), not their union, and certainly not the controllers themselves.
5. That even after they retire, it's still not possible to volunteer their services without pay, because lawyers and insurance companies rule the world.
If you haven't learned all of those things by now, you need to add another phrase to your bitter, irascible, old man repertoire: while "get off my grass" is funny, "don't bother me with facts" would appear to be more accurate.
What? This year, above ALL others, we need to show support for the event.
So...you seem to know the inner workings of the FAA. Accepting that controllers are blameless in this cluster f*ck...who DO we blame for this lunacy?
Whenever people biotch an moan about how much goverment employees make, I wonder why they didn't get themselves a goverment gig if it is so enviable ?
This is just my opinion, but I think being a parasite is unappealing to most people. I know I would chew glass before working for the government in a non-military position -- but perhaps that's just me?
And before you go off, yes, I know there are some jobs that must be done by government. That doesn't change the fact that they exist solely because they must, and the rest of us must pay for it, or go to jail.
But this is far afield from the topic of this thread. The topic is what to do about the freaking FAA and Oshkosh this year?
Obviously kidnapping and beating the pink shirts has been voted down by the group. Now what? Is there really ANYTHING we, as a group, can do?
Two years ago I double shifted on the Flightline on the Saturday or Sunday before opening Monday, and spent 6 hours within 50 feet of the green dot. One of the most fun days in my aviation career, and the only thing I flew that day was my F-150.
This is just my opinion, but I think being a parasite is unappealing to most people.
It may mean squat, but it would be interesting if the exact date, time, and location of the "Ask the Administrator" session at Oshkosh was WIDELY disseminated on this board, the Blue Board, etc. so we can all hear for ourselves what they say, and they can hear us.
So, every single non-military government employee, regardless of position or qualifications, is a parasite? Not a bit of redeeming value in any of them?
There's a word for people that think like that...
big·ot
noun \bi-gt\
Definition of BIGOT
: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group with hatred and intolerance.
You, however, really should not take offense at the government being called a "parasite", as the modern federal government fits the dictionary definition to a "T":
You called anyone who works for the goverment a parasite. I understand why someone who does honest work for the goverment would take offense to that.
I have spare seat in a C-150 if you want. My wife won't fly in with me, and she wants me to fly with another pilot.
You don't REALLY think the administrator will dare to show his face at OSH this year, do you?
Whenever people biotch an moan about how much goverment employees make, I wonder why they didn't get themselves a goverment gig if it is so enviable ?
Josh, good to hear from you. Sounds like you're enjoying your new ride.
I sincerely appreciate the invite, and would love to take you up on the offer, but I'm pretty sure I would put any C-150 over gross.
Let me know when you're going up to KOSH though. We should connect.
I wonder how many of Jay's hotel guests are current or former government employees?
Just seems kind of strange that someone who relies on earning a living by providing a service to a diverse population would be so willing to trumpet his ignorance and intolerance on the internet...
For the central planning 'only the gov't can do that' folks. From Jay's link: a private firm offering ATC services, look attractive. I spoke to the company's George Cline about this and he said AirBoss can find the insurance, although it's expensive, and has the staff--all AirVenture and Sun 'n Fun veterans--to run ATC at OSH. He says they could do it for half the price of the FAA's bid or less. The would use about 22 controllers compared to the FAA's 50 or 60.
You, however, really should not take offense at the government being called a "parasite", as the modern federal government fits the dictionary definition to a "T":
*****************************
Parasite. An animal or plant that lives in or on another (the host) from which it obtains nourishment. The host does not benefit from the association and is often harmed by it.
*****************************
H. He says they could do it for half the price of the FAA's bid or less. The would use about 22 controllers compared to the FAA's 50 or 60.[/I]
What, a private ATC business can be twice as efficient for half the cost? No way!
And people here get riled at calling the FAA "parasites"...?
In May the EAA got a bill. Millions have already been committed to this event. It is the lifeblood of the organization. So they're just supposed to say "screw you, we won't pay". Let's say they call the FAA's bluff. Do you honestly think that the FAA would care? Do you honestly think that any American's outside of Northern Wisconsin would care?
Seems like the wisest course to me. The organization can probably afford the hit and the show goes on. But Jay is right. If the FAA continues this policy and makes it worse, I can see the epitaph for this event. It would be a real loss, too.