MU-2 into mountain grass strip.

Discussion in 'Flight Following' started by stratobee, Jun 24, 2015.

  1. mikegreen

    mikegreen Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    201
    Location:
    Denver
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    mike g.
    That *is* the MU-2 Bruce Jenner owned..
     
  2. Henning

    Henning Ejection Handle Pulled

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    39,481
    Location:
    Ft Lauderdale FL
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    iHenning
    Is it named Caitlyn now?
     
  3. mikegreen

    mikegreen Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    201
    Location:
    Denver
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    mike g.
    Whatever you want on the marriage certificate :)
     
  4. SkyDog58

    SkyDog58 Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2015
    Messages:
    13,572
    Location:
    My own special place.
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Canis Non Grata
    So is it a hangar queen?
     
  5. ClimbnSink

    ClimbnSink Ejection Handle Pulled

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    6,997
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Greg
    No it is out on the ramp queen, horrifying sensible people.
     
  6. Henning

    Henning Ejection Handle Pulled

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    39,481
    Location:
    Ft Lauderdale FL
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    iHenning
    With the flaps down it's a drag queen. When it's running it's a flaming queen. If it has to go around it's a flaming drag queen.
     
  7. SkyDog58

    SkyDog58 Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2015
    Messages:
    13,572
    Location:
    My own special place.
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Canis Non Grata
    :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
     
  8. dans2992

    dans2992 En-Route PoA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2013
    Messages:
    3,536
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Dans2992
    Jenner owned an MU-2? Did he pilot it him/herself
     
  9. Kritchlow

    Kritchlow Final Approach

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2014
    Messages:
    6,609
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Kritchlow
    The MU-2 has a reputation of being dangerous. No idea if that's a myth or well deserved. My first 14.1 hours of multi after my MEL rating were in an MU-2. I recently removed that from my logbook, as I didn't want to log "Fake PIC" and the time was a-ok for single pilot ops.
     
  10. RotorAndWing

    RotorAndWing Final Approach

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2008
    Messages:
    8,496
    Location:
    Other side of the world
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Rotor&Wing
    Myth. The MU-2 flies and performs well if properly flown. As you are aware it flies more like a jet than a prop. The "bad reputation" came from low time inexperienced pilots getting in above the head and skill level.
     
  11. SkyDog58

    SkyDog58 Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2015
    Messages:
    13,572
    Location:
    My own special place.
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Canis Non Grata
    Actually the MU-2 has had a bad reputation which still lingers. That is not a myth. At one time there was some substance to the reputation as it had a very high accident rate and a huge percentage of those accidents were fatal. However the FAA determined that the aircraft wasn't necessarily dangerous if flown by pilots properly trained in its handling characteristics. The FAA also determined that many of those accidents were caused by pilots who unfortunately were not properly trained. That is why the FAA issued a SFAR on the MU-2 mandating type specific training. Since then, the accident record of the aircraft has significantly improved.

    A lesson to be learned by those who shun type specific training.
     
  12. N801BH

    N801BH Touchdown! Greaser! Gone West

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    17,188
    Location:
    Jackson Hole Wy
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    FBH
    The real reason the safety improved is most have crashed and not many are left...:rolleyes::rolleyes:;)...:D..

    It is a high performance aircraft and needs to be flown with top notch skill... Gravity will bite you REAL quick in one if you get slow..

    Best joke I heard was... " If you want a MU-2, buy 40 acres somewhere because sooner or later a MU-2 will fall on it"....:eek:.....:D
     
  13. kkoran

    kkoran Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,490
    Location:
    Renton, WA
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Kent
    As far as I know, MU-2s have always been approved for single-pilot ops.
     
  14. Kritchlow

    Kritchlow Final Approach

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2014
    Messages:
    6,609
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Kritchlow
    Right... "The time", not "At the Time".
     
  15. SkyDog58

    SkyDog58 Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2015
    Messages:
    13,572
    Location:
    My own special place.
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Canis Non Grata
    :rolleyes:
    You just ain't right.
     
  16. N801BH

    N801BH Touchdown! Greaser! Gone West

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    17,188
    Location:
    Jackson Hole Wy
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    FBH
    Probably.....:D
     
  17. Neal Howard

    Neal Howard Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,183
    Location:
    Wichita Falls, TX
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Neal@F14
    The WiFi there doesn't work so well when 100 + devices are trying to hit it simultaneously all at once during the Super Cub Fly-In :lol:
     
  18. ronnieh

    ronnieh Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,085
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Ronnie
    Actually the -10 engines on the short body are flat rated to 665 HP each if I remember correctly. I am not sure what the thermodynamic horse power is but it is quite low resulting in a very low altitude for temp out.
    The Marquise (long body) had engines flat rated to 715 horse power with a thermodynamic rating of I think 775 which also results in a low temp out altitude. On a +20 day they temp out at around 8K and struggle to the high teens. The -25 conversion changes the compressor section out to give the -151A 840 thermodynamic but they are still flat rated to the original 715 giving a higher temp out altitude. I am not absolutely sure but I THINK 715 is the highest flat rated power available on the MU-2's I know more useless information.

    What rotowing and skydog said is very true. A couple of points is the lack of ailerons and the fact that the craft will not climb single engine in fact may have a negative climb while the gear is in transit (which takes 8-10 seconds). The extremely narrow gear can make cross wind landing and T.O. interesting. Flown correctly by a competent and well trained pilot they are good aircraft.

    Edit: one other thing is the fuel system, good grief!
     
  19. N801BH

    N801BH Touchdown! Greaser! Gone West

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    17,188
    Location:
    Jackson Hole Wy
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    FBH

    I bet......

    Best to check emails at 3 am....

    Altho the new shower building is real nice...
     
  20. Henning

    Henning Ejection Handle Pulled

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    39,481
    Location:
    Ft Lauderdale FL
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    iHenning
    Interesting, the -10 on the Jetstream were 1020hp IIRC.
     
  21. ronnieh

    ronnieh Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,085
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Ronnie
    I THINK that is a different series engine. The Jetstream uses the -10 UG or some such thing. MU2 is a -10?? I can't remember but, different. I think the UG is a 1100 thermodynamic and flat rated to 1020 or something like that.
    I guess it could be looked up if it was really important.:)
     
  22. Henning

    Henning Ejection Handle Pulled

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    39,481
    Location:
    Ft Lauderdale FL
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    iHenning
    The ones we had at Express1 (NW Airlink) were a U- <some more stuff> with the U designating the NTS system IIRC, it's been 20+ years...
     
  23. ronnieh

    ronnieh Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,085
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Ronnie
    Not sure about that. The 331's used in the MU2, B100, Jet stream, Conquest and others all had the NTS without the letter U in their dash numbers. Not important enough to research it. There must be some 331 operators here that can straighten this out. That is assuming it needs straightening. :D
     
  24. Jimmy cooper

    Jimmy cooper En-Route

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    Messages:
    4,327
    Location:
    Baltimore md.
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Jim cooper
    I've flown in the right seat of an MU2 a good bit. The pilot, a good friend, has over 14000 hours, lots in a lear and probably 5000 in the MU2. It's a wonderful airplane to fly in, gets out quickly , climbs fast ( and yes it will climb on one engine) it's not something you fly after a cessna 310 or a shrike commander without a complete checkout by an MU2 pro. Accidents have been , for the vast majority, due to inexperience and not being familiar with the engine out procedure which is different from the usual due to the flaps. It has a very heavy duty gear and a grass runway is no problem. In the hands of a pro its a winner.
     
  25. ktup-flyer

    ktup-flyer En-Route

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2012
    Messages:
    3,787
    Location:
    Tupelo, MS
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    ktup-flyer
    I know SMO has. There was a fuss over it at Naples, and a few other airports, but I'm not sure if they ever did anything
     
  26. Dave Theisen

    Dave Theisen En-Route

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,424
    Location:
    Marietta, GA
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Dave Theisen
    While they have a unique sound, they are by no means loud. But I guess people can complain about anything
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2015
  27. Kritchlow

    Kritchlow Final Approach

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2014
    Messages:
    6,609
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Kritchlow
    Are the P180s not as loud as the standard Garrett? Not doubting you, just curious.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2015
  28. stratobee

    stratobee Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,112
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    stratobee
    The P180 has a lower dB rating than a King Air. But it's square wave sine and is easier to spot and perhaps more annoying. But not louder.
     
  29. N747JB

    N747JB Final Approach

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    6,092
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    John
    I don't think any turbo-prop is as loud as an MU-2! :yikes: Even the Conquest II's are quieter, not by much. :D