brien23
Pattern Altitude
Moss Interpretation of maintenance supervision requirements on indefinite, but not permanent, hold. What is the latest information on this, or did it just go away?
Moss Interpretation of maintenance supervision
- Thread starter brien23
- Start date
Half Fast
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- May 7, 2016
- Messages
- 21,190
- Location
- Central Florida
- Display Name
- Half Fast
- Home Airfield
- KGIF
It’s the only way the FAA can fix what they did without admitting they screwed up. I suspect “indefinite” will prove to be “eternal.”
I think the main issue still not revealed was who convinced the Little Rock FSDO manager, Johnathan Moss, to submit the remote supervision question in the first place and why. Some believe it was part of the same industry groups who became irate when the LOI reply went south as they had the most to gain from using remote supervision. What I find interesting is these people got more upset with "supportive notes" of the reply vs the actual context of the LOI request and answer. But in the end, nothing has changed.