I'm thinking we really should start a separate thread called like "Airplane Sellers Gone Wild" as a home dedicated to storing some of the more... extreme... listings out there. Because there's a whole lot of clown town in the market.
Is it the (Glasair?) in your profile photo? If so, good tasteI called the peak in September and bought one. So there is that.
Yep. I have been looking at them for years. Life, the Medical, Insurance and Money finally aligned. The Sportsman fits the mission well. I am also happy to report that it has been re-usable after every landing!Is it the (Glasair?)
Really, I think ownership is just the commitment of the whole thing. The purchase price of the airplane, as we know, is only a part of that equation. I don't know if waiting any longer would have made much difference on the price of the plane. I just went ahead and did it. I'm apparently not getting any younger.
Maybe it's like single family homes and private equity. Somebody's decided to corner the market and the market is adjusting. Who knows?I haven’t been on TAP/barnstormers/controller in a month or so…I went on the other day…HOLY COW! Maybe it was a bad sample/ just the listings I was clicking on but prices are not even funny anymore…a 2-year-old cirrus for almost 1.5x retail, a newish Mooney like mine for 90k MORE than I paid for mine BRAND NEW, a 10 year old A36 for a nearly new price…what the???
I will frequent and contribute. Have so many that I wanted to post in this thread...The absurdity of TAP listings finally drove me to do it. I bought a new domain and am setting up a site to memorialize the insanity of these listings. It's called "www.ClownTown.LoL". It'll be a no frills site that accepts TAP/barnstormer links and commentary. I'll probably build it this weekend.
Not HTTPS yet so your browser might scream bloody murder if you try and visit.
If nothing else I intend it to be a place where I can store my favorites, like a recently listed 70's 172 for 230k$.
EDIT: Might also accept zillow listings b/c as I consider places to move, some of those listings are just as bad if not even more hilariously awful.
Wow that's quite a jump in N from Nov->Dec... I'll have to check my data and see if I got that kinda spike.Barnstormers. Dec 6, 2023. Review of Cessna 172N listed for sale.
29 aircraft identified for sale with clearly stated list price.
Average list price = $127,332. High = $250,000. Low = $48,000.
Average Engine SMOH = 720 hours. High = 1,627. Low = 0.
_______________Aug 2023____Sep 2023_____Oct 2023____Nov 2023____Dec 2023
Avg list price.___$123,204_____100,542______133,563____127,922_____127,332
Avg SMOH.________1,140_______1,651________894________1,245_______720
Count (N)__________11__________7___________11_________9___________29
Post #_____________509________573__________654_______687_________731
It’s wild. I’m glad I got into aviation when I did. If it took 35-45k to buy an average at best Cessna 150 or Grumman Yankee I’d have never gotten into the hobby. 35-40k for a Cessna 140??? Nah!I haven’t been on TAP/barnstormers/controller in a month or so…I went on the other day…HOLY COW! Maybe it was a bad sample/ just the listings I was clicking on but prices are not even funny anymore…a 2-year-old cirrus for almost 1.5x retail, a newish Mooney like mine for 90k MORE than I paid for mine BRAND NEW, a 10 year old A36 for a nearly new price…what the???



That might be the case. Despite prices shooting up within the past few months the inventory seems stagnant. I have seen at least 4 tail numbers for which the previous listings were still available in the depths of the internet. The planes were bought for mid $80s (assuming full asking was paid) and now, a year later, those are listed in high $110s with no appreciable upgrades or maintenance done. C'mon, a used 430 does does not merit a 30k increase in price. Funny fact: some even reuse the previous listing's pictures.I wonder if clown pricing is occurring because financial reality is catching up with some over stretched owners? (IOW - oh crap, I really do have to keep making payments month after month).
My sanity departed me a long time ago. Judging by the direction of this country, I'm not aloneI think @ArrowFlyer86 needs a non aviation hobby to keep his sanity...regardless of how hilarious clowntown is. I suggest beekeeping.
On the other end of the absurdity is the guy on barnstormers wanting to trade his 1988 Suzuki Samurai for a plane. Are those things collectible? If so, why???
Funny fact: some even reuse the previous listing's pictures.
Apparently they are now and I don't get it. Back when I owned several Samurai, you bought them because they were a budget option to a Jeep. They weren't better than a Jeep, just cheaper. Now you can get a coil spring inline 6 TJ in better condition than the nicest Samurai in existence for less. Granted finding a Samurai that hasn't been hacked up or rusted away is way more rare but it's still a crappy little car that has no business costing more than a couple grand haha.I think @ArrowFlyer86 needs a non aviation hobby to keep his sanity...regardless of how hilarious clowntown is. I suggest beekeeping.
On the other end of the absurdity is the guy on barnstormers wanting to trade his 1988 Suzuki Samurai for a plane. Are those things collectible? If so, why???
Good point, cost of restoring or rebuilding could be higher than resale value. I am more versed on collector cars, very true in that market.I personally don't feel like truly exceptional restored airplanes have a high enough value and the ones that need work a low enough value.
It is. Ask me how I know. But like many things, there is the intangible value of having the use of the restored or rebuilt airplane in the future.Good point, cost of restoring or rebuilding could be higher than resale value.
It's possible but I suspect its due to insurance prices for lower time younger pilots that are financing the planes. Most of the older guys I talk to don't carry insurance anymore and aren't required to since they likely aren't financing.What I find interesting is that simple planes (Cherokee fixed gear 4 seat, C-172, C-15x) are commanding a premium relative to more capable machines (think Mooney, Bonanza, Arrow). I wonder how much this is driven by insurance? We've got another thread running on 75 year olds and insurance. And don't even get started on twins (which are 2x to feed and then some not counting maintenance).
This is based on simple observation and not any scientific analysis of the data.
One pilot on this board explained that since he lost his insurance he lost his hangar as insurance was required as part of his lease. So at least liability I assume.It's possible but I suspect its due to insurance prices for lower time younger pilots that are financing the planes. Most of the older guys I talk to don't carry insurance anymore and aren't required to since they likely aren't financing.
Well that is true too though I think some insurance companies will write a policy just for not in motion type coverage as well.One pilot on this board explained that since he lost his insurance he lost his hangar as insurance was required as part of his lease. So at least liability I assume.
I can verify this is being done...I saw an ad for the plane I sold in 2022 and they used some of my pictures, too - plus one new one. Weird...I guess they liked mine and didn't think they could improve on themNow that's hubris.
For myself complex or even HP are out of the question. Won't be financing a plane, but insurance will be an issue. An older low time pilot in this market makes full coverage insurance prohibitive. More capable aircraft than say a 172 are about the same cost, in some cases lower. Original thinking was only a supply and demand issue, now insurance can be added.What I find interesting is that simple planes (Cherokee fixed gear 4 seat, C-172, C-15x) are commanding a premium relative to more capable machines (think Mooney, Bonanza, Arrow). I wonder how much this is driven by insurance? We've got another thread running on 75 year olds and insurance. And don't even get started on twins (which are 2x to feed and then some not counting maintenance).
This is based on simple observation and not any scientific analysis of the data.
There is still one listed. Is it the "Oakruin Moonupper"?I can verify this is being done...I saw an ad for the plane I sold in 2022 and they used some of my pictures, too - plus one new one. Weird...I guess they liked mine and didn't think they could improve on them
I’m in the same boat, but 4 years away. Every time I think of going to a Bonanza, I think through the insurance in 4 years, and say nah… I’LL just keep my Tiger!Spot on - I’m with you that I believe the cost of insurance for retracts is driving demand down. My problem is compounded because in 8 years I’ll be 70, which means I’d have to sell it after a short ownership.
Yep. The engine drive with built in air compressor on my service truck was 12k when I bought it. Up over 22k now. Sucks. But it's the game ya gotta play.Everyone just has to accept a new norm unless you want to enter a period of deflation. We are needing to buy a heat treat system that 2 years ago was $70k. It is now $135k. It's not just airplanes. Inflation sucks. Welcome to the rodeo.