As you should have already predicted, chat is telling you all is well. shocker. They're technically correct in that it is in line with current prices. I'll give you my take as the resident class traitor in here:
I used to own a 150, and generally played in the sub-60K market for the duration of my tenure, in the "good ol days" of the 20 aught and 10s... you know the land of milk and honey where I could have a non-working spouse, rent, and own 3 airplanes on 60% of the net income I do today with two workers, a mortgage and no airplane. But clown Jerome telling me inflation is transitory, as his "board of governors" take out food and energy from the core CPI. clown shoes for the main clowns.
At any rate, this is the problem with that aircraft rung. Certified makes it even less economical because the regulatory "tax" is flat-fee, making it outsized relative to the capex in a way it isn't for something like a twin turbo piston. Basically, those costs would be identical for a much more capable single engine piston, making the more expensive plane cheaper
per capita, IF you insist on playing in certified land. Which is why a 150 is meant to be rung out by grifty flight schools, not owned personally, especially if the onus is on "cheap time building". The 172RG would be an even more egregious example, though with TAA it has largely become obsolete even in that context. I'm not exagerating when I say a parallel valve O-540 [field] overhaul would have been cheaper than the angle valve 360 that kicked me out the hobby. Similar principle.
As to the line item themselves, as chat has already highlighted, it's in line with the current reality. That's what monopoly money does when everybody shrugs their shoulders at the Fed stealing your labor value so "institutional investors" (...and certain favored payrolls) could be made whole.
Instead of getting mad at the provider, get mad at the purchasers of your labor. How come it's ok for everyone to pass thru their inflation on to you, but the second you try the same it's all of a sudden blasphemy? Don't answer that I'm being rhetorical. See organized labor and regulatory capture/lobbying figured it out a while ago; go get rid of the Jones Act and watch the mice jump off the proverbial ship around here. Digressing.
Start getting mad, or start cheating. I'm never gonna allocute on a public forum, but I sincerely suggest going forward, experimental would be the only remaining way to semi-keep up with the labor theft of present circumstances. It can be done in the certified side, but 1 2 3 4 fif, I pleadeth the fif.
