Google Wants All of Class G for Its Drones

world domination. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

You think that's funny, but there is a level of truth, because without developing the technology they are developing, the petrodollar, the last vestige of the world dominance we held disappears and and the entire western civilization collapses to Chinese economic, and Islamic social, control.

This isn't about Google gaining world dominance, it's about us maintaining western civilization.

We have failed to adapt and evolve, rather we back slid in the evolution of the human social order, and natural law does not allow for that. We either adapt or die; unless we build Skynet. Since the common enemy of Communism (China and Russia are still very much communist, China by constitution and Russia through Putin; he is very much a Bolshevik.) and Islam is the European aristocracy, and they hold their power through the their stake in the central banks, stock, and commodities, markets. This portfolio is managed by the Rothschild syndicate which includes the Morgan Trust and other major stake holders in the Federal Reserve.

This is why I think it interesting to see how much rope the govt is willing to give Amazon on this program, it provides a bellwether into if we are considering a war of attrition with China to protect the petrodollar challenge that is coming from the Chinese. It's an effective bellwether as well because there is prior restrictive regulatory precedent from before the recent changes in the balance of world order.

For those interested and not paying attention, I'll summarize: China, Russia, Iran and Syria have formed a symbiotic alliance in causes. Sunni's are our friends, Shia are our enemies. This is because Sunni's pump petrodollars and Shia don't; this is the core of the war that exists within Islam today, Shia consider Sunni infidels for supporting our currency. There are more issues as well going all the way back to Sunni believing that Islam should be lead dynastically vs Shia democratically. This is mostly because the Shia come through Persian roots rather than Arabian, and Persians were weary of dynasties. So, the communists and the Shia Islamists both have a common enemy in a common cause, and the destruction of the Federal Reserve is but a small part of that picture, and China has already overtaken economic size lead last summer.

Then a couple of weeks ago when the Russians entered the Syrian conflict in support of Asad, our enemy, and the Russian general went to our embassy in Iraq and told the ambassador, "Stand your planes down in Syria, we are going in." and we blinked. With China showing their presence with an aircraft carrier and troops, we conceded their force superiority and our inability to effectively challenge it. So, the Cold War has turned with the Comminists still gaining strength and the Aristocracy they have been fighting, China all the way back to the Opium Wars, and the still aristocracy losing strength.

The next thing that went down is the U.S. Navy challenged China at Mischief Reef in the disputed Spratly Islands region of the South China Sea. We sailed by, a and the Chinese did not couch any threat that they would not tolerate any resource challenge for the development of a new oil field that may be the biggest in history. That is the time challenge the petrodollar faces is the SE Asia oilfield control the Pacifi theater of WWII was fought over that because the Java Sea belonged to Queen Wilhelmina and pumped in dollars. Pearl Harbor was staged to weaken the force to defend her claim and maintain petrodollar status. You see, we still live in a feudal society that is controlled by ownership of, and public access to resources.

So, that really makes Google's program at this moment in history rather significant, because they are developing the 'Skynet' technology we need to have in place in the next 5 years to conventially repel the challenge from the Islamic Communist challenge. In 5 years they will have have developed that l field, and with their alliance with Shia Islam also enter into an alliance with Shia Indonesia in a symbiotic situation there helping the Shia in their internal struggles and achieving a mutual goal of further separation from their colonial masters which are represented by the cost to their economy as well as the moral costs of being forced to pump petrodollars.

Until we have Skynet, we can't beat this without going Nuke, and when we go nuke, it'll be like spoiled child throwing the chess board, beaten by the Persians who invented the game. So the challenge to meet right now for the Military Industrial Complex is to create autonomous and semi autonomous combat vehicles so sacrifice in a war of attrition, because without we stand no chance.

So this also serves as a bellwether for how confident the aristocracy is in it's ability to meet this challenge. The more rope Amazon gets, the more scared they are.

Welcome to the next 5 years.
 
Last edited:
"if I'm not doing anything wrong, what do I have to worry about?"

No, if you want service you often need to share personal info. Try to order a pizza for delivery and refuse to 'share' your home address.

Google is the same, they use your data to provide service. Simple as that. The rest is technopanic.
 
You think that's funny, but there is a level of truth, because without developing the technology they are developing, the petrodollar, the last vestige of the world dominance we held disappears and and the entire western civilization collapses to Chinese economic, and Islamic social, control.

This isn't about Google gaining world dominance, it's about us maintaining western civilization.

We have failed to adapt and evolve, rather we back slid in the evolution of the human social order, and natural law does not allow for that. We either adapt or die; unless we build Skynet. Since the common enemy of Communism (China and Russia are still very much communist, China by constitution and Russia through Putin; he is very much a Bolshevik.) and Islam is the European aristocracy, and they hold their power through the their stake in the central banks, stock, and commodities, markets. This portfolio is managed by the Rothschild syndicate which includes the Morgan Trust and other major stake holders in the Federal Reserve.

This is why I think it interesting to see how much rope the govt is willing to give Amazon on this program, it provides a bellwether into if we are considering a war of attrition with China to protect the petrodollar challenge that is coming from the Chinese. It's an effective bellwether as well because there is prior restrictive regulatory precedent from before the recent changes in the balance of world order.

For those interested and not paying attention, I'll summarize: China, Russia, Iran and Syria have formed a symbiotic alliance in causes. Sunni's are our friends, Shia are our enemies. This is because Sunni's pump petrodollars and Shia don't; this is the core of the war that exists within Islam today, Shia consider Sunni infidels for supporting our currency. There are more issues as well going all the way back to Sunni believing that Islam should be lead dynastically vs Shia democratically. This is mostly because the Shia come through Persian roots rather than Arabian, and Persians were weary of dynasties. So, the communists and the Shia Islamists both have a common enemy in a common cause, and the destruction of the Federal Reserve is but a small part of that picture, and China has already overtaken economic size lead last summer.

Then a couple of weeks ago when the Russians entered the Syrian conflict in support of Asad, our enemy, and the Russian general went to our embassy in Iraq and told the ambassador, "Stand your planes down in Syria, we are going in." and we blinked. With China showing their presence with an aircraft carrier and troops, we conceded their force superiority and our inability to effectively challenge it. So, the Cold War has turned with the Comminists still gaining strength and the Aristocracy they have been fighting, China all the way back to the Opium Wars, and the still aristocracy losing strength.

The next thing that went down is the U.S. Navy challenged China at Mischief Reef in the disputed Spratly Islands region of the South China Sea. We sailed by, a and the Chinese did not couch any threat that they would not tolerate any resource challenge for the development of a new oil field that may be the biggest in history. That is the time challenge the petrodollar faces is the SE Asia oilfield control the Pacifi theater of WWII was fought over that because the Java Sea belonged to Queen Wilhelmina and pumped in dollars. Pearl Harbor was staged to weaken the force to defend her claim and maintain petrodollar status. You see, we still live in a feudal society that is controlled by ownership of, and public access to resources.

So, that really makes Google's program at this moment in history rather significant, because they are developing the 'Skynet' technology we need to have in place in the next 5 years to conventially repel the challenge from the Islamic Communist challenge. In 5 years they will have have developed that l field, and with their alliance with Shia Islam also enter into an alliance with Shia Indonesia in a symbiotic situation there helping the Shia in their internal struggles and achieving a mutual goal of further separation from their colonial masters which are represented by the cost to their economy as well as the moral costs of being forced to pump petrodollars.

Until we have Skynet, we can't beat this without going Nuke, and when we go nuke, it'll be like spoiled child throwing the chess board, beaten by the Persians who invented the game. So the challenge to meet right now for the Military Industrial Complex is to create autonomous and semi autonomous combat vehicles so sacrifice in a war of attrition, because without we stand no chance.

So this also serves as a bellwether for how confident the aristocracy is in it's ability to meet this challenge. The more rope Amazon gets, the more scared they are.

Welcome to the next 5 years.

Skynet? Really? Me thinks iHenning misses the SZ already.
 
Skynet? Really? Me thinks iHenning misses the SZ already.

Not the movie version but what will become the reality of the technology and the need we face to limit human attrition in the face of a conventional war with China. It's in development, this isn't Terminator, this is real life it is already in development. Heck, we even have people on this board who are involved. Drones killing people using autonomous recognition are the future and the only way we can militarily over power China and survive. The military industrial complex is on it and has been for over a decade. The thing is the time scale they were looking at no longer is sufficient in the light of the change in threat. Amazon may provide the low cost, high capacity production solutions with a minimum of code required to make it combat ready.
 
Last edited:
How light can you build a .223 mini gun with a 2000 round feed, especially if it was disposable only needing to fire those rounds?
 
The target recognition and engagement software is the big challenge, but I think between face recognition technology, terrain recognition technology, GPS guidance technology, the global terrain database provided by the Shuttle, and Google's collision avoidance software, that all already exists at a highly refined level already industry; that the integration coding and optimization for new mission should be pretty straightforward even though complex and tedious. The logic processes are all coded, they just need integration and new parameters entered.
 
So we can only fly IFR above 14,500? Yeah, I don't think so.
Me either!

I could see them maybe being given the right to operate maybe up to 700' since we really aren't supposed to be below 1000' over populated areas, anyway, if they can prove that they can have VERY, VERY excellent control over those drones. I resent that Google seems to desire to be the Costco of Idiocracy, though... most of the pilot population is around these big cities, too, and plenty of us are the one's who'd be endangered by their drones having "issues."
 
No, if you want service you often need to share personal info. Try to order a pizza for delivery and refuse to 'share' your home address.

Google is the same, they use your data to provide service. Simple as that. The rest is technopanic.

You are very naïve.

Google tracks you even if they DON'T provide a service to you. Other trackers provide no service to anyone (except various corporations).

Turn on a tracker identifier and see how many NON-GOOGLE websites Google Analytics (or similar G services, such as advertising companies they own) show up on. The browser fingerprint identifies you specifically.

It is one thing if they are providing a service you consume & you consent to the "price" (including knowledge of the price you pay).... it's entirely different when the data collection is opaque and you don't use their service.

To use your pizza example: you know the price of the pizza and you consent to providing your address in exchange for delivery. Transparent.

Ad-supported sites: you know part of the price (the need to see advertising), you don't know and can't consent to the "price" involving data collection.

Google - do you really know what they're collecting on you? Have you consented based on reasonable knowledge of the price - or the value of your information? Do you have any reasonable means to establish the value of an asset you own - your own information - or to receive reasonable compensation for same?

I suppose if we took your logic to a conclusion we'd say that because you used Google Maps to find your way to your lover's place that Google then has a right to collect audio and video from your phone while you're there....
 
You are very naïve.

Google tracks you even if they DON'T provide a service to you. Other trackers provide no service to anyone (except various corporations).

Turn on a tracker identifier and see how many NON-GOOGLE websites Google Analytics (or similar G services, such as advertising companies they own) show up on. The browser fingerprint identifies you specifically.

It is one thing if they are providing a service you consume & you consent to the "price" (including knowledge of the price you pay).... it's entirely different when the data collection is opaque and you don't use their service.

To use your pizza example: you know the price of the pizza and you consent to providing your address in exchange for delivery. Transparent.

Ad-supported sites: you know part of the price (the need to see advertising), you don't know and can't consent to the "price" involving data collection.

Google - do you really know what they're collecting on you? Have you consented based on reasonable knowledge of the price - or the value of your information? Do you have any reasonable means to establish the value of an asset you own - your own information - or to receive reasonable compensation for same?

I suppose if we took your logic to a conclusion we'd say that because you used Google Maps to find your way to your lover's place that Google then has a right to collect audio and video from your phone while you're there....


Ya lost me in the first sentence when ya called me names.
 
Anyone who doesn't think the telecoms and Google aren't defense contractors, isn't paying attention. AT&T was caught splitting fiber well over a decade ago.
 
Google wants most of Class G?


I know where Google can stick that idea.
 
Back
Top