# Finally a voice of reason

Discussion in 'Hangar Talk' started by Morgan3820, Mar 24, 2020.

1. ### TantalumFinal Approach

Joined:
Feb 22, 2017
Messages:
5,269
Display Name:

Display name:
San_Diego_Pilot
^I can just imagine the Dale Gribble conspiracy theories

2. ### PalmpilotTouchdown! Greaser!

Joined:
Apr 1, 2007
Messages:
16,965
Location:
PUDBY
Display Name:

Display name:
Richard Palm
Eliminating the rounding errors:

100
123
146.37
172.7166

Linear would be this:

100
123
146
172

What I'm waiting for is not a linear increase, but an exponential curve with a base of less than one. [Edited for accuracy.]

Last edited: Mar 29, 2020 at 11:31 AM
3. ### PalmpilotTouchdown! Greaser!

Joined:
Apr 1, 2007
Messages:
16,965
Location:
PUDBY
Display Name:

Display name:
Richard Palm
More testing would do a lot to solve the squishiness of the numbers.

By the way, the FACT that caseloads in some places have exceeded the available medical facilities is not "made up."

PeterNSteinmetz likes this.
4. ### TantalumFinal Approach

Joined:
Feb 22, 2017
Messages:
5,269
Display Name:

Display name:
San_Diego_Pilot
I'd be curious to know how many of the "active" cases require a hospital ventilator.
My understanding is that the vast majority of people who get this don't need to be in the hospital, as, after all, there is no real known cure.

5. ### azureFinal Approach

Joined:
Apr 2, 2005
Messages:
8,233
Location:
Varmint Country
Display Name:

Display name:
azure
Not correct. We are talking about the rate of increase (the increase per day) being a constant percentage of the current value. That IS exponential growth. If
(increase per unit time) = (constant) x (current value)
then
value (as a function of time) is proportional to e^(constant x time).

The "constant" might be a small enough number that it doesn't LOOK lilke exponential growth, at least in the short run, but it is.

6. ### timwintersTouchdown! Greaser!

Joined:
Feb 23, 2008
Messages:
13,431
Location:
Conway, MO
Display Name:

Display name:
LTD
voice of reason...yeah...right! as Bill Gates said:

It’s very tough to say to people, ‘Hey keep going to restaurants, go buy new houses, ignore that pile of bodies over in that corner. We want you to keep spending,’ because there’s maybe a politician who thinks GDP growth is what really counts.

SoCal RV Flyer, RyanShort1 and wrbix like this.
7. ### PeterNSteinmetzCleared for Takeoff

Joined:
Sep 9, 2015
Messages:
1,279
Location:
Tempe, AZ
Display Name:

Display name:
PeterNSteinmetz
Yes, perhaps easiest to just plot the log of the number of total cases. If that looks like a straight line, then it is exponential growth at a constant rate.

As of the day before yesterday (when I last did this for the US data), it looked like a fairly constant exponential growth with a 2.5 day doubling time. There was a slight hint of a decrease in the slope, but nothing that appeared outside the range of random variation.

8. ### azureFinal Approach

Joined:
Apr 2, 2005
Messages:
8,233
Location:
Varmint Country
Display Name:

Display name:
azure
That's what I've been doing for the Vermont data. Because the sample size is so small, there is a good deal of random variation, but the linear fit is fairly good and the doubling time is consistent with the national value (about 2.4 days, with no sign of flattening as of two days ago).

PeterNSteinmetz likes this.
9. ### TarheelpilotEjection Handle Pulled

Joined:
Dec 5, 2010
Messages:
3,652
Display Name:

Display name:
Tarheelpilot
I would rather die free.

We will get exactly what we are asking for in this country.

10. ### PeterNSteinmetzCleared for Takeoff

Joined:
Sep 9, 2015
Messages:
1,279
Location:
Tempe, AZ
Display Name:

Display name:
PeterNSteinmetz
There is fairly good accumulating evidence that hydroxychloroquine shortens the duration of viral shedding to between 4-6 days.

Whether such people are then immune is not presently measured, but that would be the normal result.

If Covid-19 becomes a trip to the doctor and some illness for a week or two (like many viral illnesses), with a need to take medicine but recovery following, it is a much less dangerous thing.

TCABM likes this.
11. ### timwintersTouchdown! Greaser!

Joined:
Feb 23, 2008
Messages:
13,431
Location:
Conway, MO
Display Name:

Display name:
LTD
BTW...I listened to an article yesterday about the 1918 flue...the stats from that era show that the economies of the cities that shut down quickly and stayed shut down until it was over recovered far faster afterwards than those that didn't.

Yes...We are FAR REMOVED from 1918...but still...a data point.

OTOH...I certainly don't understand why Chicago would outlaw running and bicycling.

???

How is it that you can't stay over 6' from people doing this? Hell, I can't imagine it's possible to get within 6' of anyone while bicycling...

12. ### Cap'n JackFinal Approach

Joined:
Jun 25, 2006
Messages:
6,901
Location:
Display Name:

Display name:
Cap'n Jack
Drafting.

Yes, I'm yanking your chain, a little.

timwinters likes this.
13. ### X3 SkierEn-Route

Joined:
Jul 3, 2011
Messages:
3,126
Location:
I19 & SBS
Display Name:

Display name:
Geezer
Maybe Chicago riders are all pros

SoCal RV Flyer and timwinters like this.
14. ### Sluggo63Line Up and Wait

Joined:
Oct 9, 2013
Messages:
969
Display Name:

Display name:
Sluggo63
"Exponential" is not a "buzz word."

TCABM, wrbix and kayoh190 like this.
15. ### PalmpilotTouchdown! Greaser!

Joined:
Apr 1, 2007
Messages:
16,965
Location:
PUDBY
Display Name:

Display name:
Richard Palm
There's a recreational trail about a block from my house, and it's shared-use between bicyclists and pedestrians. It's not wide enough to be able to maintain six-foot separation while passing.

iflyvfr likes this.
16. ### PalmpilotTouchdown! Greaser!

Joined:
Apr 1, 2007
Messages:
16,965
Location:
PUDBY
Display Name:

Display name:
Richard Palm
Amen. Even with my engineering background, I had misremembered the form of the equation until I was straightened out by one of Azure's posts earlier in the thread.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_function

17. ### Chip SylverneEn-Route

Joined:
Jun 17, 2006
Messages:
4,893
Display Name:

Display name:
Fear is the poison of our lives.
Do you have a cite? Because this isn't what I've been hearing anecdotally from friends in the medical community. I should say that I have read the Chinese article in Lancet, but have heard nothing official about the trials taking place in NY. Is that where your info is coming from?

Last edited: Mar 29, 2020 at 11:43 AM
18. ### lowtimerPre-takeoff checklist

Joined:
Jul 9, 2008
Messages:
175
Display Name:

Display name:
Lowtimer
Is it possible that exponential is being used because many people think it means x10 or squared?

19. ### jbarrassLine Up and Wait

Joined:
Jan 28, 2010
Messages:
692
Location:
Vienna, VA
Display Name:

Display name:
jbarrass
X3 Skier likes this.
20. ### murpheyFinal ApproachPoA Supporter

Joined:
Aug 21, 2008
Messages:
9,266
Location:
Display Name:

Display name:
murphey
2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024.....for those us in the software industry, powers of 2 (exponents) are tattoo'd in our brains.

wrbix likes this.
21. ### azureFinal Approach

Joined:
Apr 2, 2005
Messages:
8,233
Location:
Varmint Country
Display Name:

Display name:
azure
In this context (pandemic), exponential is being used because it is accurate, at least in the early stages.

22. ### azureFinal Approach

Joined:
Apr 2, 2005
Messages:
8,233
Location:
Varmint Country
Display Name:

Display name:
azure
I posted on Brian's board that over the last two days, the Vermont data is showing signs of flattening. If I take only the data from Thursday through Saturday, the doubling time appears to be 4.8 days. Still too early to say whether this is truly a trend, but it is somewhat encouraging.

23. ### lowtimerPre-takeoff checklist

Joined:
Jul 9, 2008
Messages:
175
Display Name:

Display name:
Lowtimer
I understand that it is accurate, but using a term that many think means x10 or squared could cause a lot of misunderstanding.

Kind of like what non pilots think when we talk about stalling the aircraft.

Joined:
Mar 19, 2005
Messages:
32,345
Display Name:

Display name:
Everskyward
There is the common usage of the word "exponential", and the mathematical one. Pretty sure the one we have been hearing refers to definition 1.

timwinters likes this.
25. ### jimhornerLine Up and Wait

Joined:
Oct 28, 2012
Messages:
555
Location:
Santa Clara
Display Name:

Display name:
Jim Horner
What’s the basis for saying “many think means x10 or squared”? If many think that, than we have a serious issue with how math is being taught in schools.

An exponential equation is in the form

f(x) = ab^x

This is basic algebra. They still teach algebra in high school these days, right?

26. ### SaltyFinal ApproachPoA Supporter

Joined:
Dec 21, 2016
Messages:
5,521
Location:
FL
Display Name:

Display name:
Salty
And if x = 1 then it’s exponential and linear.

Half Fast and Van Johnston like this.
27. ### lowtimerPre-takeoff checklist

Joined:
Jul 9, 2008
Messages:
175
Display Name:

Display name:
Lowtimer
Yes there's a serious issue with math in this country. Algebra is still taught, but in most schools it is not required for graduation.
Long division is to much for a lot of people applying for entry level jobs here.

murphey likes this.
28. ### PalmpilotTouchdown! Greaser!

Joined:
Apr 1, 2007
Messages:
16,965
Location:
PUDBY
Display Name:

Display name:
Richard Palm
In f(x) = ab^x, x = 1 would refer to only one point along the curve, because x is the variable, with a and b being constants.

Due to the fact that it's been a long time since I've worked with this stuff, in an earlier post I had "exponential" confused with f(x) = ax^b, where the base is the variable and the exponent is a constant. (I have since gone back and corrected my post.)

29. ### SaltyFinal ApproachPoA Supporter

Joined:
Dec 21, 2016
Messages:
5,521
Location:
FL
Display Name:

Display name:
Salty
The letters you choose for the variables is irrelevant. If b=1 it’s still linear

30. ### PalmpilotTouchdown! Greaser!

Joined:
Apr 1, 2007
Messages:
16,965
Location:
PUDBY
Display Name:

Display name:
Richard Palm
When you're graphing f(x) = ab^x, If b = 1, you not only get a straight line, it's a HORIZONTAL straight line!

The formula for a linear function is f(x) = ax + b.

azure likes this.
31. ### Checkout_my_SixTouchdown! Greaser!

Joined:
Mar 4, 2007
Messages:
10,155
Location:
Maryland
Display Name:

Display name:
Check_my_Six
The problem with the news...they make it sound like it’s gonns stay exponential...it’s not ...and it’s not asymptotic towards infinity. It will taper to a normal distribution.

32. ### tspearPattern AltitudePoA Supporter

Joined:
Dec 10, 2010
Messages:
2,133
Display Name:

Display name:
Timothy
And algebra is a common core requirement.
In many states, parents and students could not hack it. So they pressured political leaders to kill it.

Sent from my HD1907 using Tapatalk

Last edited: Mar 29, 2020 at 6:29 PM
33. ### Chip SylverneEn-Route

Joined:
Jun 17, 2006
Messages:
4,893
Display Name:

Display name:
Fear is the poison of our lives.
Well, yeah, but the only thing that will make it less efficiently spread is the development of herd immunity, if measures aren't taken to limit contact. That's a pretty gruesome natural experiment, the curve could remain pretty darn steep in a population with no previous exposure.

Checkout_my_Six likes this.
34. ### azureFinal Approach

Joined:
Apr 2, 2005
Messages:
8,233
Location:
Varmint Country
Display Name:

Display name:
azure
The one we have been hearing where? The use of "exponential" by epidemiologists when talking about the pandemic is most definitely definition 2.

Palmpilot likes this.
35. ### azureFinal Approach

Joined:
Apr 2, 2005
Messages:
8,233
Location:
Varmint Country
Display Name:

Display name:
azure
If "it" means the total number of cases that have occurred, "it" will eventually flatten to a horizontal line. (Though in principle, the y-value of that line could be the entire population of Earth - probably not though, since many infections have not been counted as "cases".)

Joined:
Mar 19, 2005
Messages:
32,345
Display Name:

Display name:
Everskyward
On the news.

37. ### murpheyFinal ApproachPoA Supporter

Joined:
Aug 21, 2008
Messages:
9,266
Location:
Display Name:

Display name:
murphey
Which is the first derivative of the polynomial ax^2 + bx + c, which is exponential.

38. ### SaltyFinal ApproachPoA Supporter

Joined:
Dec 21, 2016
Messages:
5,521
Location:
FL
Display Name:

Display name:
Salty
ax+b

39. ### azureFinal Approach

Joined:
Apr 2, 2005
Messages:
8,233
Location:
Varmint Country
Display Name:

Display name:
azure
2ax + b. But ax^2 + bx + c is quadratic, not exponential. The first derivative of an exponential function is exponential, as is the 2nd derivative, and ...

40. ### SaltyFinal ApproachPoA Supporter

Joined:
Dec 21, 2016
Messages:
5,521
Location:
FL
Display Name:

Display name:
Salty
Oops, you’re right

PeterNSteinmetz and azure like this.