FAA has published a new Fact Sheet for MOSAIC

"Allow for increased capacities for passengers, fuel, and cargo."

Increased capacities for passengers.... maybe fatter ones but still limited to ONE passenger.

No mention of lowering costs? Does the EAA know about this HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
No mention of lowering costs?
How much would you charge as an A&P to perform a condition inspection on an E/AB? I know you are intimidated to do that kind of work from your previous posts, but if you did how much?
 
How much would you charge as an A&P to perform a condition inspection on an E/AB? I know you are intimidated to do that kind of work from your previous posts, but if you did how much?
I most likely wouldn't. Its kinda funny that people think AnPs just want to collect liabilities like trading cards.

Possibly for something like an RV, but a plans built for composite? Y'all can take that ride.

As for lowering the cost.... granted a small portion would probably get the repairman cert. But this is after they build a $150k-200k RV or some other popular kit. I mean spending $150k+ on an EAB or LSA to avoid an $800/$1000 annual is a smart financial decision.

Also if you build an EAB you get the repairman cert for free. Kind of a wash really.
 
As for lowering the cost.... granted a small portion would probably get the repairman cert. But this is after they build a $150k-200k RV or some other popular kit. I mean spending $150k+ on an EAB or LSA to avoid an $800/$1000 annual is a smart financial decision
Well saving $1000 per year is lowering the cost is it not? So, you've proven your own assumption to be false.

However, what you fail to understand is an important reason a number of people do not look at used E/AB aircraft is the need to still find an A&P to perform the condition inspection which changed with MOSAIC. I think if you actually got out and looked you'll find there are more A&P performed condition insps than you realize.

Regardless, there is still a huge unknown how the new Part 22 LSAs will affect the used non-TC aircraft market which I believe will be an important player in reducing the entry costs for recreational flying. You may not see it with your limited experiences, but those who have been in the industry for years are seeing the same potentional growth. But we wont know for a couple more years. So I dont know how you can make those comments with any certainty at all.

I most likely wouldn't. Its kinda funny that people think AnPs just want to collect liabilities like trading cards.
Thats just your opinion. I know a number of A&Ps who still regularly work with E/ABs and other experimental aircraft to include myself. So it falls to the person whether they find signing off condition inspections on E/ABs is too challenging for them or not.
 
Last edited:
Well, I have to admit, I do love the touch of FAA professionalism and quality displayed in this document, such as reversing this photograph

1765290701976.png


or their depiction of what they apparently think is a Light Sport Aircraft in this photograph.

1765290773331.png
 
Possibly for something like an RV, but a plans built for composite? Y'all can take that ride.
That, at least, makes sense. Not because it's an experimental, but if you have no experience in composites, you have no business inspecting one, even if you are an A&P. For the same reason many A&Ps today won't work on fabric covered aircraft, even standard certified ones.

The local A&P on our field had no problem working on experimentals (be built a Tailwind, after all), but he wouldn't touch anything that didn't have a Lycoming or Continental engine.

The A&P I use now works on experimentals, but he only does owner assisted annuals or condition inspections, and he only works with owners who are personally involved in the maintenance of their airplanes. His goal is to teach and educate the owner while doing the inspection. Even though I'm scheduled for the LSRI class, I plan to have him do or work with me on the first CI of my new-to-me plane, just for the second set of eyes.
 
or their depiction of what they apparently think is a Light Sport Aircraft in this photograph.
Last I was told by a couple enthusiastic Stearman owners was that some Stearmans qualify as Light-Sport under MOSAIC....
 
Last I was told by a couple enthusiastic Stearman owners was that some Stearmans qualify as Light-Sport under MOSAIC....

They sound over-enthusiastic! Did they perhaps mean that some Stearmans can be flown by SPs? I can see that might be the case, but it doesn't make the planes LSAs.
 
Last I was told by a couple enthusiastic Stearman owners was that some Stearmans qualify as Light-Sport under MOSAIC....
They do. Well, no, they're not LSA because they retain their standard certification, but yes, they can now be flown by Sport Pilots with the necessary endorsements (tailwheel, high performance (>200HP)).
 
A&Ps and non production airplanes, state of Maryland.

The Geezer has met several A&Ps here that did inspections and maintenance on non production aircraft, of a variety of types, including Vareezies. Composites were not their favorites, and generally avoided, as some still avoid Cirrus.

Their customers provided the specs and build drawings, the mechanic became familiar, and became the go to man for that design.

Unlike the detractors here, they had good personal relations with their customers, They ALL required owner assistance, and liability was not an issue.

Some grumbled about how much they had to learn about water cooled non Continental/Lycoming unique features, but very much enjoyed the emergency trips to remote airports that did not have a willing mechanic.

As the fleet size grow's, the number of qualified and willing A&Ps will also grow. Currently, the percentage of A&Ps who will do repairs on your Mustang are decreasing, and less common WW 2 planes practically non existent.

Increasing numbers of composite production planes will result in a growing selection of non destructive test devices to evaluate integrity of the materials used, and generic manuals on techniques to be used.

The future is promising for both the prospective owners and the mechanics who will inspect or repair them.
 
As for lowering the cost.... granted a small portion would probably get the repairman cert. But this is after they build a $150k-200k RV or some other popular kit. I mean spending $150k+ on an EAB or LSA to avoid an $800/$1000 annual is a smart financial decision.
That analysis seems to presume that the alternative to building a $150k-$200k RV is a world where the keys to new $800k Cirri are handed out gratis with the PP certificate.
 
or their depiction of what they apparently think is a Light Sport Aircraft in this photograph.

1765290773331.png
The picture seems to imply that this Stearman has been converted to Experimental and that the conversion qualifies it for maintenance by LSRM.
"Allow for increased capacities for passengers, fuel, and cargo."

Increased capacities for passengers.... maybe fatter ones but still limited to ONE passenger.
Um, I think you're reading this wrong.
1765328669325.png

Part 22 allows for 4 seats, which is 2 more than previous Light Sport Aircraft.
 
Back
Top