Thank you.
You are correct in looking for one. The regulations are requirements, not a syllabus. Same for the ACS.
Syllabus for the course, lesson plan for each lesson, additonal reference material, and lesson tracking are all different things. Back when I was doing primary, I took the material from several (they really are all 99% the same and wrote my own. Lesson order, lesson general content, and tracking so I know it was logged in the student's logbook. This was the first page.
Unless, of course, one plans to teach short field and soft field landings before ever getting to stalls and slow flight.
Unless, of course, one plans to teach short field and soft field landings before ever getting to stalls and slow flight.
Yes exactly... seems like too many options . The FITS is free but having no experience using it was wondering if there are pitfalls to it or maybe a better mousetrap. I will take a closer look at the other options. Thanks to all for those suggestions.
Actually, you'd be finished with all the cross countries before you got to slow flight and stalls
Don't worry about too many options since they are mostly identical.
I am in a similar place, ie regular teaching job non aviation related. My friend who is also working on his Cfi is going to use Sporty’s as well. I will look more closely at that.
Another thing about Sporty's - the associated syllabus has been free for years, but they recently made the courses themselves free for CFIs. Good marketing but great for us who use them.
No reason to either. I showed up with a set of prefab lesson plans (including some 20 year old ones my CFI passed on to me
) and three I wrote myself. I've written more lesson plans and syllabi since becoming a CFI than I wrote before.
Yes. I started doing that unprompted during my intial training for ppl and agree that's a good tool. The added bonus is that it would give them a sense of ownership. I could assign that in pieces that are germane to the lesson.
No reason to either. I showed up with a set of prefab lesson plans (including some 20 year old ones my CFI passed on to me
That's because they didn't have to walk uphill both ways in shoes made of cardboard.
Or because they don’t know the difference between walking uphill and walking downhill.
Because they really never walked anywhere except to the car.
Thats because they don't get as winded when walking uphill
Regardless of the reason, that level of ignorance isn’t good.Thats because they don't get as winded when walking uphill
Not sure what I did 24 years ago has much relevance to new CFIs these days,
Just commenting the CFIs I encounter who use someone else’s lesson plans tend not to know or know how to teach the manuevevers.
We might need to agree to disagree on this one. That's not necessarily a function of whose lesson plans are being used. That's true of any (valid) source material. You can memorize the entire library of FAA material from the FAR to the Airplane Flying Handbook and still not be able to teach it effectively. That's especially true of the simple outline of a good lesson plan.