Breitling and Sponsorships

A quick thread drift type of question...

How many of you believe you are impacted by sponsorships or celebrity advertising? Do you buy a particular product because of who endorses it or what activities the corporation sponsors?
 
An expensive watch is jewelry folks. How do you justify jewelry? You can't - really. It just makes you feel good.

For some people that feeling is worth the money. For others it's not.
 
Fun discussion. Surprised at their revenue. Damn. Anyone want to start a watch company with me? :)

SkyDog58 said:
A quick thread drift type of question...

How many of you believe you are impacted by sponsorships or celebrity advertising? Do you buy a particular product because of who endorses it or what activities the corporation sponsors?
Click to expand...

I don't think I'm swayed by this. Though I will say it probably brings brands to my attention that I wouldn't have otherwise known / thought about. It definitely works though. A friend of mine saw my watch and said, "Thought you'd have a, what is it.. Breitling?" Interesting. But I definitely don't buy because so-and-so did a commercial.

When I was 17 I came to understand the power of advertising. I was working as a lot attendant at a car dealership (best job ever!) and wanted a snack. I went to the vending machine and saw a Snickers and thought, "Oh, that really satisfies" and bought it. So advertising does work, and I always think about that story when I'm buying something. "Is this something I really want? Or am I having a Snickers moment?"
 
Unit74 said:
Who the eff wears a watch anymore? Seriously. Do,som people watching. Literally. It's rare to see a wrist watch anymore, cept in the hood where they gots fake ass Fo-lex stuff they got at the swap meet or from the rent-A-wheel shop.
Click to expand...

I don't ever get into a plane without an old fashioned watch.
I have a 30+ year old, self-winding, Seiko chronograph, no battery, no electronics, keeps perfect time and has time, elapsed time, hours, minutes and seconds.
With a watch, a ruler, and a map and a pencil, you can navigate to anywhere from anywhere.
I've had planes jammed full of technology that crapped out on me. My watch has never failed.
You can even determine direction using a watch, should your compass fail.
 
Grum.Man said:
I just don't understand why you would need such an expensive watch. My $100.00 Timex tells time just as good. It's lasted 10 years and if I loose it I wouldn't feel the need to file an insurance claim.
Click to expand...

Wow... rich man..!!!:lol:

My 19.95 Walmart special just died after 5 years. Going to be hard to replace that one.

I have my dads watch, the one he bought at a PX around 1972. It is one of those that you shake to wind up. It still works, but I don't use it because I don't want to take a chance on damaging it.
 
SkyDog58 said:
A quick thread drift type of question...

How many of you believe you are impacted by sponsorships or celebrity advertising? Do you buy a particular product because of who endorses it or what activities the corporation sponsors?
Click to expand...

Not me. In fact I'll sometimes NOT buy something because some jerk is featured in an ad.

Cheers
 
NJP_MAN said:
My $10,000 rolex tells time worse than your timex. But it's a rolex and I bought it to signify a special moment in my life. Timex doesn't really do that the same way.
Click to expand...

The day you became $10,000 poorer? ;)
 
X3 Skier said:
Not me. In fact I'll sometimes NOT buy something because some jerk is featured in an ad.

Cheers
Click to expand...

I am the same way. I avoided drinking Pepsi for several years because this one freak did commercials for them.
 
I'm not impacted by advertising in any way, but I did just save a bunch of money on car insurance by switching to Geico.
 
SkyDog58 said:
A quick thread drift type of question...

How many of you believe you are impacted by sponsorships or celebrity advertising? Do you buy a particular product because of who endorses it or what activities the corporation sponsors?
Click to expand...

I have tried desperately to like Red Bull, because of their continued sponsorship of aviation. I did the same thing with Red Baron Pizza, back when they were sponsoring a flight team.

Unforunately, both products suck hind teat so badly that I can't (and couldn't) choke them down. Advertising and sponsorships can only help so much.
 
I am not enamoured with any musical artist, movie star, athlete, or politician. I don't care what product they're peddling, I don't buy products based off of celebrity approval. I may think a commercial is cool, or funny, or terrible. My purchase of a product is based off of need/want, and what will satisfy me for the least amount of expenditure.

I can't see myself owning any watch as exorbitant as a Rolex or Breitling, but I do think some models are attractive as jewelry. I only wear a wrist watch when I'm dressed up in a suit, which is only a couple of times a year. Otherwise I don't bother with a watch at all. There are clocks on every electronic device in my house it seems, and several on the walls.

Sent from my SM-T700 using Tapatalk
 
Lindberg said:
I

I think you mean it can display a picture that looks like the face of a Rolex. That's not the same thing as emulating a Rolex.
Click to expand...
Actually, it goes well beyond showing a picture. The 3D animations showing moving gears, second hands, etc, are really quite amazing and wonderful.
 
SkyDog58 said:
A quick thread drift type of question...

How many of you believe you are impacted by sponsorships or celebrity advertising? Do you buy a particular product because of who endorses it or what activities the corporation sponsors?
Click to expand...

There's people on this board that actually have disposable income left over to spend on things other than flying planes? :eek:
Unimaginable :D

[the only thing I have ever seen in a Breitling commercial that I want to own is the P-51]
 
Maciej said:
Love Patek, was a tough call between picking up a 5164A and my current AP. Although now that I'm getting divorced it'll be much easier to justify it to myself lol
Click to expand...

Which AP do you wear now? I love my 15202...
Had a Safari and 15400ST before the Jumbo. Never been a big fan of the "sporty" Pateks (heck, I don't even like 5711!)
 
Gsxrpilot said:
I like the large faced watches. I've always wanted a Breitling but always had other priorities in watches. I have a Rolex, a Bell&Ross, a U-boat, and Omega. Some day I'll own a Breitling. By the way, always buy second hand. Retail is for suckers.
Click to expand...

I only buy new, because I can't afford second hand prices. I do make nice additional income by selling watches that I've bought new from AD though...
 
mtuomi said:
Which AP do you wear now? I love my 15202...
Had a Safari and 15400ST before the Jumbo. Never been a big fan of the "sporty" Pateks (heck, I don't even like 5711!)
Click to expand...

Rocking a diver, upgrading to a panda shortly. Ultimately looking to get into a ceramic ROO.
 
NJP_MAN said:
The day I got the ATP certificate. The type rating got me a big paycheck so technically spending 10k was still making lots of money.
Click to expand...
No it wasn't. You were still spending money, you just had more money to spend. The watch did not make you money.
 
I love peanut m&ms but can't bring my self to buy them with them sponsoring Kyle Busch.
 
RalphInCA said:
No it wasn't. You were still spending money, you just had more money to spend. The watch did not make you money.
Click to expand...
Well you're right, I could have worded it different. I still netted piles of money even though I spent a small pile on the GMT Master II BLNR
 
NJP_MAN said:
Well you're right, I could have worded it different. I still netted piles of money even though I spent a small pile on the GMT Master II BLNR
Click to expand...

Batman is one of those watches that won't really depreciate either, so your money is "safe" there...
 
mtuomi said:
Batman is one of those watches that won't really depreciate either, so your money is "safe" there...
Click to expand...
I agree. I didn't get Batman for an investment purpose. But I think it's going to be very safe like you say. If takes a loss in value over time it won't bother me either.
 
RalphInCA said:
I'd like to see you do that in an airplane, in instrument conditions, in turbulence.
Click to expand...

If you are in IMC and turbulence, without instruments, you have a host of other problems to solve before you need to know what direction you are going.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top