Sac Arrow
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- May 11, 2010
- Messages
- 21,565
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Display Name
- Snorting his way across the USA
Superbowl TFR the size of the DC SFRA? Holy mother of Christ it's huge.

Doesn't this prove that the current stadium TFR's are useless?
All TFR's are useless
Besides the TFR, if you are thinking about operating in or out of any of these Bay Area (and beyond) airports from Thurs-Tues, you need a ramp reservation from the FBO, even for a drop-off.
https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/super_bowl_50/
Interesting article on how they plan to keep the skies above the Superbowl safe from invading Cessnas...
http://www.popularmechanics.com/mil...tice-intercept-procedures-for-the-super-bowl/
Besides the TFR, if you are thinking about operating in or out of any of these Bay Area (and beyond) airports from Thurs-Tues, you need a ramp reservation from the FBO, even for a drop-off.
https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/super_bowl_50/
...Only less useful are the VIP ones, mostly since said VIPs are utterly replaceable and interchangeable even these days.
I know it's fashionable to say that, but it's a very sweeping assumption. For example, I have a hard time convincing myself that the replacement of Lincoln and Kennedy with Andrew Johnson and Lyndon Johnson, respectively, had no significant effect on the course of history. Different presidents have different policies and different degrees of leadership ability.
Thanks for the clarification. Did not know that but we will be IFR and have our reservation.According to Oakland Center, the Thursday to Tuesday FAA ramp space reservation system does not apply to VFR flights, so you apparently need to make arrangements directly with whoever has jurisdiction over the ramp space you're proposing to use:
"VFR PILOT CLARIFICATION: The Super Bowl 50 reservation system is not being used for VFR air traffic reservations. However, the airport may have more stringent requirements due to limited ramp space and resources. Please contact Airport Authorities where you are based and if further clarification is needed, you may contact Tonya Patterson at SJC Tower or Tom Pactol with Northern California TRACON. Numbers are listed below in the links section under facilities."
http://www.fly2sb50.org/
Stadium TFRs rank pretty high on the stupid scale. Only less useful are the VIP ones, mostly since said VIPs are utterly replaceable and interchangeable even these days.
YuuuupJust govt giving the illusion,that they can keep us safe,they also like to impress everyone with the power they can yield.
I know it's fashionable to say that, but it's a very sweeping assumption. For example, I have a hard time convincing myself that the replacement of Lincoln and Kennedy with Andrew Johnson and Lyndon Johnson, respectively, had no significant effect on the course of history. Different presidents have different policies and different degrees of leadership ability.
Cheney liked to fish both around Vail and Jackson Hole. Fun following his moving circle.
I know it's fashionable to say that, but it's a very sweeping assumption. For example, I have a hard time convincing myself that the replacement of Lincoln and Kennedy with Andrew Johnson and Lyndon Johnson, respectively, had no significant effect on the course of history. Different presidents have different policies and different degrees of leadership ability.
holy monkey-needs-a-ride-from-alabama that's a big TFR!
Still can't post any pictures . . . .It doesn't matter if they're doing it for Cessnas, ultralights, or Honda jets. The chances of one of those F15s splashing a civilian aircraft that isn't showing obvious hostile intent is zero. And once the hostile intent is obvious, it will be too late. The VIP TFRs make sense because they serve as a warning device to allow time to get the VIP off the X. But that doesn't work with a full stadium.I'm involved with this, so I can't say much.
Let's leave it as that article is missing a few things. Errant Cessnas are probably what will occupy their time, but they are not the point.
Hint: It's a 36 mile radius. Why so big? It takes a fast Cessna 15 minutes to cross that.
Yawn. Statists, all. No difference.
That would be why he said, "these days." Don't recall seeing much leadership coming from DC in the last 8-10 years. Buzz Lightyear could do as good as most of the 535 elected Representatives at the Capital, to say nothing if the whole crew down Pennsylvania Avenue. And no, I'm NOT limiting this to the Executive--let's also include IRS, FBI, TSA, Homeland Security . . . .
So if Spiro Agnew, Dan Quayle, or Al Gore had needed to assume the office of president, it wouldn't have made any difference? If Kennedy had lived, he would have handled the Vietnam War as badly as Johnson did? Sorry, I'm not buying it. Glib labels don't prove a thing.
Nope no difference at all. Same cabinet, same Congress, same advisors, same Parties. Yes Kennedy would have handled Vietnam as badly as Johnson. Worse probably, since he wouldn't have had the stomach for it and we'd have lost sooner.
"Glib" assumptions of grandeur and placing of relatively dumb individuals on pedestals, is as boring and unprovable as my opinion is, which isn't glib at all.

It's based in watching politicians my entire life and seeing specific patterns that repeat over and over.
They're out for one thing above all others, themselves. Interestingly they become heroes and martyrs only by being killed. See how much you think so, as exhibit number one to be placed in evidence.
They're generally expendable as far as society as a whole goes.
It's hard to see how anyone could have done as bad a job as Johnson did in communicating with the public about the war, and communicating is something that Kennedy was much better at. However, if you're right that he would have gotten us out of the war sooner, are you really going to hang your hat on the idea that ending the expenditure of blood and treasure sooner would have been insignificant?
The nice thing is at least this thread can't get stuck in the spin zone now.
If Kennedy hadn't been shot in Dallas, he might have died of tetanus from a shaving cut two weeks later (if only he'd used an electric razor...). If the Back to the Future trilogy taught us anything, it's that if things were different, they wouldn't be the same.So if Spiro Agnew, Dan Quayle, or Al Gore had needed to assume the office of president, it wouldn't have made any difference? If Kennedy had lived, he would have handled the Vietnam War as badly as Johnson did? Sorry, I'm not buying it. Glib labels don't prove a thing.
The nice thing is at least this thread can't get stuck in the spin zone now.