Half Fast
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- May 7, 2016
- Messages
- 21,187
- Location
- Central Florida
- Display Name
- Half Fast
- Home Airfield
- KGIF
Canada has had disruptions for a while now.And so it begins.
Nothing new. We had a fuel delivery at our airpark yesterday and the driver/owner of the fuel company mentioned it. It’s not the first time over the last several years that he said a tanker ship was delayed. Ships are the only way that 100LL is delivered to the distributors in Florida. Ship is late, fuel runs out.And so it begins.
Nothing new. We had a fuel delivery at our airpark yesterday and the driver/owner of the fuel company mentioned it. It’s not the first time over the last several years that he said a tanker ship was delayed. Ships are the only way that 100LL is delivered to the distributors in Florida. Ship is late, fuel runs out.
Nope, at least not yet. I actually placed an Avgas and Jet-A order today for next week, and no delays have been noted. We use Titan, and our fuel comes from different terminals than yours, but we’ll see if anything changes.Anybody else running into this?
There are more than that.
Just a screenshot off an AOPA articleThere are more than that.
Any near Winter Haven Florida?Just a screenshot off an AOPA article
We have domestic LL.Oddly worded
So we have domestic 100LL or we are reliant on euro for it?
If the latter that no bueno
We have domestic LL.
There were some hiccups during Covid. I somehow managed to go to two airports in a row without fuel once in 2021 or 2022. I was more diligent about checking beforehand after that...
Tetraethyl lead (TEL) is only synthesized by UK-based Innospec. No other lab in the world is producing TEL. That means US-based sources are actually "assembling" avgas, using a foreign import as a key ingredient.Oddly worded
So we have domestic 100LL or we are reliant on euro for it?
If the latter that no bueno
Seems pretty clear. 100ll is for the most part produced here. TEL is not. But that doesn't mean the end product isn't produced here.Oddly worded
So we have domestic 100LL or we are reliant on euro for it?
If the latter that no bueno
Seems pretty clear. 100ll is for the most part produced here. TEL is not. But that doesn't mean the end product isn't produced here.
I just used this...but it's fitting. View attachment 140026
Fantastic. What are you thinking going to say to them?Nah
This is my industry
Don’t think I will
Fantastic. What are you thinking going to say to them?
There's this incredibly toxic chemical that costs a fortune to start up production. Everyone wanted it gone 20 years ago.By all accounts it'll be gone within 5 years. In the meantime, can you force a private enterprise to spend a ton of money they'll never recover because some of the private aircraft training fleet can't fly without it?
So we took lead out of auto gas and out of paint just cuz?I’ll say it’s been around forever and never hurt anyone, go use your energy to make your bed eat right and exercise
And it’s a TON of the fleet, want to talk to some folks in the industry who would be destroyed? I’ll post some links
So we took lead out of auto gas and out of paint just cuz?
Save your effort. I know the studies. Lead is coming out regardless of how much kicking and screaming you do. And it'll be a good thing.
We're in the position were in because we drug our feet for 30 years.
Most of the fleet won't be destroyed. Most of the training fleet would have options. Whether it's mogas or 94 UL.
The effects of lead exposure isn't death. More neurological and developmental.Just the facts sir
Show me how many people die directly provable from 100ll per year
Ill just be waiting here
The effects of lead exposure isn't death. More neurological and developmental.
Agree 100%. This is a problem that was solved in the automotive and marine sectors four decades ago. The piston GA world never found a solution because there was never any motivation to find one. Now there is. GAMI 100UL is already available as a viable option, and they have the STC to prove it.We're in the position were in because we drug our feet for 30 years.
Most of the fleet won't be destroyed. Most of the training fleet would have options. Whether it's mogas or 94 UL.
That motivation you mention is MONEY.Agree 100%. This is a problem that was solved in the automotive and marine sectors four decades ago. The piston GA world never found a solution because there was never any motivation to find one.
Isn’t it even more convoluted?That motivation you mention is MONEY.
For a little math exercise:
- Find out how much money was required to design those automobile engines to run on unleaded gas.
- Divide that number by the number of auto engines to be sold.
- Now divide that same number by the number of GA engines to be sold.
Would those two answers be anywhere in the same universe?
Even that isn't necessarily true anymore. GAMI 100UL has the closest thing to a universal STC probably ever issued. It just needs wider distribution, but it's making progress. It is a bit more money, but that is offset by reduced frequency for oil changes and an overall reduction in maintenance cost by not having lead gumming everything up.It’s a specific subset which still need leaded.
Even that isn't necessarily true anymore. GAMI 100UL has the closest thing to a universal STC probably ever issued. It just needs wider distribution, but it's making progress. It is a bit more money, but that is offset by reduced frequency for oil changes and an overall reduction in maintenance cost by not having lead gumming everything up.
Agree 100%. This is a problem that was solved in the automotive and marine sectors four decades ago. The piston GA world never found a solution because there was never any motivation to find one. Now there is. GAMI 100UL is already available as a viable option, and they have the STC to prove it.
Maybe this will even provide the motivation to get a modern light GA piston engine design to market. It would be great to see something like the Adept Airmotive line make it to the certified world with some STCs. More diesel conversion choices would be nice, too. Options are good.
Yes, online photos are definite proof of everything.Gami is not a viable option, it has caused damage to aircraft plenty of photos of this online
Or just don't spill it all over your wing maybe? And if you do, rinse it off?Gami is not a viable option, it has caused damage to aircraft plenty of photos of this online
Or just don't spill it all over your wing maybe? And if you do, rinse it off?
I guess that the pump gas our cars run isn't ready for prime time then. (Spill it on your car's paint over and over and never wash it off and see what happens.)Any fuel that needs to be treated like that isn’t not remotely ready for prime time
I guess that the pump gas our cars run isn't ready for prime time then. (Spill it on your car's paint over and over and never wash it off and see what happens.)
Ok, so it's something to keep in mind if you have tanks that have not been re-sealed in 30 years. Beyond that, this is anecdotal data. One of the planes already had a known leak. If tanks with old sealant do end up showing a propensity to leak with GAMI 100UL (questionable but possible), then re-seal them with a compatible sealant, just like when 100LL came out and every Mooney ever started leaking.I have, it’s not remotely the same as what’s happened with the enviro fuel
![]()
![]()
“ … after two California owners reported issues with fuel leakage after putting GAMI's G100UL in the tanks. The fuel is available at three California airports.
Mooneys and many Pipers were not factory equipped with rubber bladders in their fuel tanks. They were formed in the structure of the wing and a sealant used to fill the voids and rivet holes in the metal. Many older Mooneys started leaking when 100LL was introduced and owners either installed bladders or had the tanks resealed with a "sloshing" treatment developed in response to the widespread problem.
One of the owners reported on mooneyspace.com that his tanks started leaking a week after he started using G100UL. Another said his tanks had been seeping (within manufacturers limits) but when he added G100UL the paint blistered in the areas affected by the seepage. GAMI founder George Braly told AVweb it's not clear what role, if any, the fuel is playing in the issues but he did say the formulation is different from 100LL, notably in its use of an aromatic chemical called Xylene to boost the octane and hence detonation resistance of the fuel. Aromatic amines are solvents, but Braly said in a detailed response to the posts it's the least aggressive of the octane-boosting chemicals. He also noted that the sealant in the tanks is likely decades old. "It lasts a long time but it doesn't last forever," he said.
Braly said the fuel has been exhaustively tested on sealants, seals and gaskets used in airplanes under the supervision of the FAA. He also said he's never seen it cause paint to peel. If spills are not cleaned up, it can cause a yellowish tan stain. Many of the responses to the thread on the forum said they were not having any problems with G100UL.”
Mooney Operators Report Leakage, Paint Issues After Using G100UL
General Aviation Modifications Inc. is inviting an operator of a wet-wing Mooney to visit Ada, Oklahoma, for a borescope inspection to assess the condition ofwww.avweb.com
Ok, so it's something to keep in mind if you have tanks that have not been re-sealed in 30 years. Beyond that, this is anecdotal data. One of the planes already had a known leak. If tanks with old sealant do end up showing a propensity to leak with GAMI 100UL (questionable but possible), then re-seal them with a compatible sealant, just like when 100LL came out and every Mooney ever started leaking.
Look around!So me the study that shows directly little Timmy became even dumber because a 172 flew over him?