Daleandee
Final Approach
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2020
- Messages
- 8,354
- Display Name
- Dale Andee
the sarcasm impaired.

the sarcasm impaired.

What the heck is a major alteration of an ultralight? Where the hell is that defined?Following up on the very early messages about not being able to install ADS-B Out in an Ultralight, that may not necessarily be true.
Apparently you can install a battery operated uAvionix SkyBeacon in an Ultralight. It has to be a Permanent installation and would take a FSDO approval as the FAA looks at it as a Major Alteration. But I bet if you talked to the FSDO first and pointed out the safety gain for both you and other traffic, like the jet you mentioned, they'd probably tell you to go ahead and then sign it off at completion.
And again with the jet not being where you thought it would be.... Another prime example of why NOT to use Internet Data for Traffic. Works a lot of the times, but when there is latency in the server/systems, it can become very dangerous for all.
One can be certain and wrong at the same time.So if you are following the Part 103 regulations for an ultralight, the FAA can take enforcement action for not following the Part 91 regulations for an aircraft? I suppose then they can take enforcement action against a part 91 activity for not following the Part 121 Regulations? I give up.
I do often wonder how visible I am to airplanes and other aircraft. Obviously my body with the motor attached is pretty small and would be hard to see, and the lines will be almost invisible. But my wing has a "wingspan" of about 30 feet and a maximum chord of about 10 feet, which is in the same range as a lot of single-engine airplanes. Plus they are typically brightly colored (not white like a lot of airplanes) - mine is bright green and blue. So am I harder to see than a Cessna 172, or easier, or about the same? has anybody seen one while flying an airplane?
I've never seen a paramotor while I'm flying an airplane, so I have no idea. I have definitely seen other paramotors while flying a paramotor, but we're usually near each other on purpose so I am already aware of them.
It makes no sense that portable ADSB isn’t available for UL’s, Cubs and the like. See and avoid sucks. And I’d never concede airspace because “you’re close to airspace you shouldn’t be in”. Thats a slippery slope.No offense bro, but you nearly killed alot of people flying an ultralight near an approach path of a jet. Fly that thing low and away from populated areas. I’m glad you are ok, but man be careful.
No, the jet nearly killed him.Because he nearly killed everyone in that jet and possibly people below. He is safer down low (500’ agl perhaps).
No real clue. My **guess** is that they really don't know how to address alterations or adding permanent equipment in an Ultralight. So this why it takes a little more paperwork and an inspection.What the heck is a major alteration of an ultralight? Where the hell is that defined?
Not correct. Part 103 has no regulations regarding the vehicle itself other than weight, amount of fuel, max speed and stall speed. No way to create paperwork and no such thing as an inspection.No real clue. My **guess** is that they really don't know how to address alterations or adding permanent equipment in an Ultralight. So this why it takes a little more paperwork and an inspection.
You might reach out to uAvionix if you were thinking about it to see if they had any guidance.
Except Part 43 does not apply to ultralights since it has no airworthiness certification or standards requirements, and so on. The only inspection required, if needed, is to see if the vehicle meets the Part 103 limitations. So you can add whatever equipment you want provided you remain within those 103 limitations and the equipment doesnt violate any other rule.My **guess** is that they really don't know how to address alterations or adding permanent equipment in an Ultralight.
Well, don't shoot the messenger that things are changing.Not correct. Part 103 has no regulations regarding the vehicle itself other than weight, amount of fuel, max speed and stall speed. No way to create paperwork and no such thing as an inspection.
I can see that you likely can't install ADS-B since you don't have an N-number.maybe just a plain old-fashioned transponder squawking 1200
Is that possible?


The last video I watched stated you had to "Register" but I don't know what that means. Maybe you can get an N# if you're trying to get ADS-B Out.I can see that you likely can't install ADS-B since you don't have an N-number.
Except that would require changes to several regulations as ultralights are not considered aircraft and do not qualify for an N-number. Technically, UAS or drones are considered aircraft so they can obtain a registration. Plus there are international requirements to adhere to with aircraft registrations as well.Maybe you can get an N# if you're trying to get ADS-B Out.
Unless they are in the process of making those changes maybe??? I really don't know much about Ultralights, but it sounds like someone was pushing the "Safety" button to push it through.Except that would require changes to several regulations as ultralights are not considered aircraft and do not qualify for an N-number.
Not really. Changes like these happen in a very predictable method. The Executor Order that pushed Part 108 to the forefront also pushed eVTOL ops to the front of the line. So at present there is only one NPRM in the mix for Part 108 and either the eVTOL move is following an existing NPRM or there will be a new notice published for that initiative. At best, "the guy in the video" may want to brush up on the NPRM process.Unless they are in the process of making those changes maybe??? I really don't know much about Ultralights, but it sounds like someone was pushing the "Safety" button to push it through.
Old fashioned non-ADSB transponder does not need or use the N-number.What is an ultralight gonna use for an N number?
Old fashioned non-ADSB transponder does not need or use the N-number.