Kenny Phillips
Final Approach
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 6,570
- Display Name
- Kenny Phillips
A US citizen, apparently, brought a knife to a gunfight.
Didn’t the news say another passenger shot him? How does that work?
And yet a passenger had a firearm to stop him.From the article: "Williams said that it was unclear how Taylor boarded the plane with a knife, though he acknowledged that the country’s smaller airstrips lacked security to fully search passengers."
Ya think?!?
There are passengers with firearms on many US domestic flights.These passengers have a full time job in law enforcement where having a weapon is part of their job.And yet a passenger had a firearm to stop him.
That is not the only qualification... And I'd bet if you have 100 LEOs on a plane, at least 97 of 'em probably aren't allowed to carry on that flight.There are passengers with firearms on many US domestic flights.These passengers have a full time job in law enforcement where having a weapon is part of their job.
Why do people heat hot water?Why would someone want to shoot a dead hijacker...??
A buddy of mine on his first rifle deer hunt as a kid was told to keep shooting if it was still moving. Well the first shot put it down. But it moved a bit so he fired again. And again. And again. He stopped after 6. It kept moving from the concussion of the bullet hitting it. So he kept hammering away.As a FFDO, we were not qualified to shoot someone until dead… we were qualified to shoot them until they stopped moving.
After all, we’re not doctors, how do we know if you’re dead?
Not true... But I believe going into any more detail is SSI so have a nice day.The qualifications for LEOs to carry are very easy. For Federal LEOs all they need is their Credentials. For all others in addition to their Credentials they need a letter from their Chief stating that they are required to have their weapon with them. So I’ll take your bet and say of your 100 LEOs at least 97 are authorized.
There's also a course. All of this is spelled out on the TSA website (minus the logistics).Not true... But I believe going into any more detail is SSI so have a nice day.![]()
Right. And since they said it first, let me just highlight the following from that web site:There's also a course. All of this is spelled out on the TSA website (minus the logistics).
Correct. And since this was on a domestic flight in Belize, the TSA and their requirements have nothing to do with it anyway.WRT this story, all I've read is that the shooter was licensed. Considering that he and the decedent both carried weapons on board (and maybe others!), I'd speculate that no one was checking.
So yeah, the key thing there is that you need to have an operational need to have the weapon DURING THE FLIGHT.
For all others in addition to their Credentials they need a letter from their Chief stating that they are required to have their weapon with them.
Required to have their weapon with them DURING THE FLIGHT is the key. That is rarely going to be true. I would bet that the majority of traveling LEOs are on leisure/personal travel, which is specifically excluded. So there's no way that 97% of LEOs are going to be authorized to carry in flight.From the post you disputed:
"Dammit, Jim, I'm a pilot, not a doctor!"As a FFDO, we were not qualified to shoot someone until dead… we were qualified to shoot them until they stopped moving.
After all, we’re not doctors, how do we know if you’re dead?
News reporting circa 2025.He was recently denied entry.
Yet he was in the country.
The article later says he demanded to be flown out of the country.
I would need help to make sense of that.
Right. And since they said it first, let me just highlight the following from that web site:
• Be authorized by the employing agency to have the weapon in connection with assigned duties.In addition to the above requirements, municipal, county, state, tribal or territorial officers must present an operational need to have the weapon accessible from the time they would otherwise check the weapon, until the time it would be claimed after deplaning.
Common examples of travel that does not meet the threshold for carriage of accessible weapons are:So yeah, the key thing there is that you need to have an operational need to have the weapon DURING THE FLIGHT. That's a tough threshold to meet, and not something that would be true of the majority of traveling LEOs.
- Individuals possessing the status of a retired, contract, reserve, auxiliary or annuitant law enforcement personnel.
- Law enforcement officers who have not been granted general arrest authority and/or are limited specifically to governmental facilities.
- Any law enforcement officer who is employed by a department, agency or service that is not fully taxpayer funded.
- Attendance of non-operational or enforcement related activities (e.g., training, conferences, police week, memorial services, personal travel, etc.).
Correct. And since this was on a domestic flight in Belize, the TSA and their requirements have nothing to do with it anyway.