sba55
En-Route
I can't say I'm at all surprised. These people are incompetent; but incompetence paired with radiation is a very bad mixture.
The USA Today "explanation" is even better: "Indeed, even the highest readings listed on some of the records — the numbers that the TSA says were mistakes — appear to be many times less than what the agency says a person absorbs through one day of natural background radiation."
Oh yes. Incidentally, the energy I was exposed today due to sun exposure was about the same as a very powerful laser pulse. The sun didn't kill me, though, yet the laser would have. Hmm... Have you ever noticed how not even the TSA has ever said that these machines are safe, only that they passed all inspections?
And if these records are all due to error, then what does this say about TSA's ability to monitor proper calibration? You've really got to be crazy to walk through these.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2011-03-11-tsa-scans_N.htm
The USA Today "explanation" is even better: "Indeed, even the highest readings listed on some of the records — the numbers that the TSA says were mistakes — appear to be many times less than what the agency says a person absorbs through one day of natural background radiation."
Oh yes. Incidentally, the energy I was exposed today due to sun exposure was about the same as a very powerful laser pulse. The sun didn't kill me, though, yet the laser would have. Hmm... Have you ever noticed how not even the TSA has ever said that these machines are safe, only that they passed all inspections?
And if these records are all due to error, then what does this say about TSA's ability to monitor proper calibration? You've really got to be crazy to walk through these.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2011-03-11-tsa-scans_N.htm