The Jetson One

Domenick

Domenick

Pattern Altitude
Joined
Sep 11, 2019
Messages
1,838
Display Name
Display name:
Domenick
Jetson is a Pioneering EVTOL company with a mission to change the way we travel. We aim to make the skies available for everyone with our safe personal electric aerial vehicle.

www.jetsonaero.com

Home | Jetson - Personal Electric Aerial Vehicle

Your personal aircraft in aluminium and carbon fibre, powered with eight powerful electric motors.
www.jetsonaero.com www.jetsonaero.com
 
8 motors... does one need a multi engine endorsement to fly one? :lol:
 
Old news. Been taking orders. Drones with a pilot and no certificate needed!
 
GaryM said:
So, they're leaving the battery pack on the ground, connected by a long cord?
Click to expand...

Does it not meet Part 103 as is? I don't know how you classify the stall speed of an octo-salad-shooter like this, maybe that's where they run into the wall. The rest looks fine. I assume it's not faster than 55kt :)
 
schmookeeg said:
Does it not meet Part 103 as is? I don't know how you classify the stall speed of an octo-salad-shooter like this, maybe that's where they run into the wall. The rest looks fine. I assume it's not faster than 55kt :)
Click to expand...
Yes, max speed is exactly 55kts. Probably a software limitation.... It's an ultralight helicopter. No stall speed.
 
schmookeeg said:
I don't know how you classify the stall speed
Click to expand...
Its my understanding its the stall speed definition that is in the gray area. Technically it falls under powered-lift and since it cant autorotate like a helicopter it has to rely on a ballistic chute for the "stall speed" equation for Part 103.

Its passed the ultralight test in several EU countries but I think with all the current regulatory changes on the horizon you'll see more aircraft like this in the future.
 
Bell206 said:
Technically it falls under powered-lift and since it cant autorotate like a helicopter it has to rely on a ballistic chute for the "stall speed" equation for Part 103.
Click to expand...
No wing, so not powered lift:
Powered-lift means a heavier-than-air aircraft capable of vertical takeoff, vertical landing, and low speed flight that depends principally on engine-driven lift devices or engine thrust for lift during these flight regimes and on nonrotating airfoil(s) for lift during horizontal flight.
Click to expand...
It's a helicopter:
Helicopter means a rotorcraft that, for its horizontal motion, depends principally on its engine-driven rotors.
Click to expand...
 
I love the fact that they put trademark scares on their post but no mention of their corruption of Hanna-Barbera's IP.
 
Lindberg said:
No wing, so not powered lift:
Click to expand...

Lindberg said:
It's a helicopter:
Click to expand...
It really depends on which direction you look at it. Actually it doesn't fit into a rotorcraft or power-lift type aircraft/vehicle. For example, all the eVTOLs that do not have a lift producing wing or cannot autorotate are considered a "unique" VTOL requiring a SFAR under Part 21 to be certified. So since an ultralight is not an aircraft the most accurate description at the moment would be a unique VTOL vehicle based on that guidance.

Regardless, there is a lot of things going on behind the regulatory scenes when it comes to these new VTOLs which from what I've seen there will be new aircraft/vehicle classifications for projects like the Jetson in the near future.
 
Bell206 said:
It really depends on which direction you look at it. Actually it doesn't fit into a rotorcraft or power-lift type aircraft/vehicle. For example, all the eVTOLs that do not have a lift producing wing or cannot autorotate are considered a "unique" VTOL requiring a SFAR under Part 21 to be certified. So since an ultralight is not an aircraft the most accurate description at the moment would be a unique VTOL vehicle based on that guidance.

Regardless, there is a lot of things going on behind the regulatory scenes when it comes to these new VTOLs which from what I've seen there will be new aircraft/vehicle classifications for projects like the Jetson in the near future.
Click to expand...
I've definitely had this debate before and not doing it again. Ultralights are certainly aircraft, and this one is a helicopter. The reason why the evtols seeking certification require a sfar is because they don't otherwise meet the category certification airworthiness requirements, not because they don't meet the definitions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top