overdrive148
En-Route
Right side of the TFR circle. check out SNL.

CAP's Flight Academy is going this week and now they've got to be grounded for a day or two due to it.

Washington (CNN)President Barack Obama commuted the sentences of 46 drug offenders, the White House announced Monday.
TFR's are just a fact of life that impacts us caused by ALL Presidents, present and future.
Wow, that's how you talk about your commander in chief?What's the Big O doing in OKC? Setting some drug dealers free?
We know that, no need to run in and defend him.
What's the Big O doing in OKC? Setting some drug dealers free?
Wow, that's how you talk about your commander in chief?
Apparently, he is going to a federal prison to talk to prisoners.
What's the Big O doing in OKC? Setting some drug dealers free?
CNN says 46 drug dealers. MSNBC says only 22. Wonder why the delta?Ultra conservative MSNBC posted this so you know it must be a lie intended to smear our current president.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/president-obama-commutes-22-prison-sentences
We got by just fine before TFRs. I'm not sure which president was in when they started, but they are a fact of life and a pain in everyone's sides.
Sure. Are you suggesting that we lie?Wow, that's how you talk about your commander in chief?
It depends on how you define the words "drug" and "dealer".CNN says 46 drug dealers. MSNBC says only 22. Wonder why the delta?
Apparently, he is going to a federal prison to talk to prisoners.
We had TFRs in the past (before 9/11) but not as many. I can remember one in the Denver area which lasted for a couple days for the Pope when he was here for Youth Day in the early 1990s, and another for the Summit of how ever many countries there were at that time. Clinton was the President then. There was also a small one for a long time after the guy left his training route in Arizona and crashed his A-10 into Gold Dust Peak in Colorado. They were looking for the bombs which they never found to my knowledge. That was also some time in the 1990s.We got by just fine before TFRs. I'm not sure which president was in when they started, but they are a fact of life and a pain in everyone's sides.
Nah...probably more fund raising.
At tax payer expense.
SZ
TFR's are just a fact of life that impacts us caused by ALL Presidents, present and future.

oops. I thought this was the SZ.Guys, take the politics - all the stuff about pardons and drug dealers - to Spin Zone.
Not for military officers. At least not to the same extent.Sure. Are you suggesting that we lie?
Or that we all give the "Heil O'Bama" salute like good little soldiers?
The 1st Amendment still applies. At least for now.
What's the Big O doing in OKC? Setting some drug dealers free?
Wow, that's how you talk about your commander in chief?
I was talking to Fearless, who is allegedly in the armed forces. No one cares how civilians refer to Obama.No, but I do know the first three words of the Constitution....
"WE THE PEOPLE...."
Unless I am in the armed forces, the President is NOT my Commander. He is supposed to be a civil servant and it is our right and responsibility as citizens to question his actions.
Or at least it used to be.
..As a former Army, I also see no issue with a member of the military criticizing POTUS as long as it is respectful and directed towards his policies and politics and not his person.
Wow, that's how you talk about your commander in chief?
..No one cares how civilians refer to Obama.
Agree, but some things start to teeter on the line, especially for commissioned officers.
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/888
Also DODI 1344.10: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/134410p.pdf
A member of the Armed Forces on active duty shall not:
...
Participate in any . . . group discussion as an advocate for or against a partisan political party, candidate, or cause.
A lot depends on tone. But the regs are pretty clear, they say active duty members shall not PARTICIPATE in group discussions concerning causes, candidates, etc. Regardless of the language that is used. Yes, that is the price (one of many) you pay for being active duty and especially an active duty commissioned officer. Now, in my opinion that regulation is overbroad and probably unconstitutional in some respects, but it's still in force until courts or the DOD say otherwise.Only frcabot could turn a factual description of a trip into political speech or talk prejudicial...
Only frcabot could turn a factual description of a trip into political speech or talk prejudicial...
I was talking to Fearless, who is allegedly in the armed forces. No one cares how civilians refer to Obama.
I swore an oath to obey the orders of the President of the United States of America. That oath says nothing about blindly agreeing with everything a President might say or do.
But if that's a problem, I guess I should submit my resignation letter.....oh wait, I already did!