No, it's because it was on a flight plan !
You mean they forgot to flip the FMS switch from 'land' to 'taxi'?
No, it's because it was on a flight plan !
One of the passengers said the landing was unusually rough. I think the indications are some kind of landing gear failure, but there's not enough information to know what.
Airplane is/was a 737-700.
Guess I'm glad I've only been there at night!
Good gawd. I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that NoHeat understands that the slides deploy automatically.
His point was that SWA is not likely to terminate the pilots for evacuating the airplane....unlike a certain other airline with questionable management....
Go look at the approach lighting system for 23 on google maps. It's elevated on a 200' catwalk system that looks like a railroad trestle. There is a street that runs underneath the catwalk that has Street View.
There is a street that runs underneath the catwalk that has Street View.
The second video on this news link has the security camera view. Unfortunately, it is chopped/edited by the news people, so hard to tell what really happened. It almost looks to me like they exited the runway and kept going straight ahead into the ditch (ie missed the turn), but the editing of the video may be misleading.It looks like that T4 way runs right next to the runway - the one report said they touched down and the accident occurred. I wonder if by "taxing" they are referring to the period of time after touch down, but not quite off the runway yet and that may have been when it occurred and ended up in the ditch in between T4 and the runway?
So what am I seeing in the security video? Is he coming down T3 and then misses the left turn onto T4? Is the ditch they ended up in in between J/L and T4/T5?They landed on 20R, not 13. BNA rarely lands on 13.
That's what it looks like to me. You can see the cargo ramp on the far side of 20R/2L in the background. What I can't see is any evidence of taxiway lighting. The nose taxi light is on but it really don't do that good of a job on a 737.So what am I seeing in the security video? Is he coming down T3 and then misses the left turn onto T4? Is the ditch they ended up in in between J/L and T4/T5?
Or they saw their gate and for some reason thought they were already on the ramp.Looks like they were texting and drove it into a ditch. Not even going that fast.
Probably following the magenta line.
I am pretty sure they were coming off of T3. The ditch they ended up in is definitely the one in between J and L off T4. There is a photo of the airplane with the left wing right next to the t-way J sign.If they landed on 20R, is it possible they crossed 13/31 at T4? On my Jepp plate, it'd be really easy to think T4 goes straight across, but looking at Google Earth, there's a very clear dogleg to the left upon crossing 13/31. Could they have hurried across, missed the dogleg, and ended up in the ditch between T4 and T5?
Does that make any sense?
I am pretty sure they were coming off of T3. The ditch they ended up in is definitely the one in between J and L off T4. There is a photo of the airplane with the left wing right next to the t-way J sign.
One slight correction, I believe they ended up in the ditch between the ramp and taxiway J not the one between J and L.Ahhh...I just now noticed the video. Interesting. What you're saying makes sense.
I am pretty sure they were coming off of T3. The ditch they ended up in is definitely the one in between J and L off T4. There is a photo of the airplane with the left wing right next to the t-way J sign.
When I first saw the video, it looked like they went straight ahead off of T3 and missed the turn onto T4, but the video is poorly edited. After looking at it a few times, it looks more like they DID initially turn left onto T4 and then made a quick right into the ditch which makes me think they were rushing, saw their gate and thought they were already entering the ramp, but that is just speculation on my part.
Yeah, that is what I first thought - excessive taxi speed gets 'em, but the crappy editing of the video is really misleading. I don't know why the news idiots felt they needed to edit that.A SWA crew hurrying the taxi? Naw, say it ain't so...
I don't think there ever was a hard landing. There was one single witness interviewed by the news who said the landing was hard and you just 'knew' something was wrong. Other witnesses said the landing was just fine.So it's for sure a taxi f-up and the hard landing is not directly related?