Does anyone have expertise with consumer banking regulations? I'm just curious about the veracity of what I'm being told by my bank, as they have been unable to substantiate it so far.
I filed a dispute on a small charge with my bank for a product/service procured using my debit card. After a couple days, with no detail requested from me, I received a letter saying that the dispute was denied. When I questioned this, I was first told that it was extremely difficult to dispute a PIN-based transaction because it was unlikely to be fraudulent (in this case, I paid first and the service wasn't subsequently delivered). I then asked whether it would be different if the debit card was swiped as a credit card, and was told no, because the account the card is tied to--in this case, a checking account--determines the regulations which govern it (this makes sense).
However, it was obvious that the bank never conducted an investigation before deciding to decline the dispute. The bank has not denied this, claiming that they were prohibited by Regulation E from even pursuing a dispute since the transaction was for a "service." When I countered that I had successfully disputed a service transaction on the same account in the distant past, the bank then said that this time was different because it was a "salon-related service" and salons have special accommodations in Regulation E. I then requested a citation of that accommodation, which I have not yet received (they first told me to "Google it".) BTW, it is a fairly wide stretch to classify this merchant as a "salon" or providing "salon-related services," though I could see the merchant making such a claim.
One thing that Google did seem to turn up is the bank's responsibility to fully investigate a dispute. I'm not sure how they could do that without requesting more information from me on the reason and justification for the dispute, which they did not do.
Since Regulation E and the fact that this was a debit card account was cited as a reason why they couldn't pursue the dispute process, I then asked them what would have happened if this had been a credit card account. They said that falls under different regulations, but that they probably still wouldn't have pursued the dispute. That kind of suggests to me that they're lazy or there's an undisclosed conflict of interest with the merchant.
So, I'm just trying to cut through the mess and figure out where the truth of the regulations lie. I've filed maybe a half-dozen disputes on various card accounts over the past 20 years, and this is the first one which I can recall that was not investigated. I'm not looking for ways to argue with the bank, but rather understand the limitations of consumer protections while using a debit card account vs credit card account.
Thanks,
JKG
I filed a dispute on a small charge with my bank for a product/service procured using my debit card. After a couple days, with no detail requested from me, I received a letter saying that the dispute was denied. When I questioned this, I was first told that it was extremely difficult to dispute a PIN-based transaction because it was unlikely to be fraudulent (in this case, I paid first and the service wasn't subsequently delivered). I then asked whether it would be different if the debit card was swiped as a credit card, and was told no, because the account the card is tied to--in this case, a checking account--determines the regulations which govern it (this makes sense).
However, it was obvious that the bank never conducted an investigation before deciding to decline the dispute. The bank has not denied this, claiming that they were prohibited by Regulation E from even pursuing a dispute since the transaction was for a "service." When I countered that I had successfully disputed a service transaction on the same account in the distant past, the bank then said that this time was different because it was a "salon-related service" and salons have special accommodations in Regulation E. I then requested a citation of that accommodation, which I have not yet received (they first told me to "Google it".) BTW, it is a fairly wide stretch to classify this merchant as a "salon" or providing "salon-related services," though I could see the merchant making such a claim.
One thing that Google did seem to turn up is the bank's responsibility to fully investigate a dispute. I'm not sure how they could do that without requesting more information from me on the reason and justification for the dispute, which they did not do.
Since Regulation E and the fact that this was a debit card account was cited as a reason why they couldn't pursue the dispute process, I then asked them what would have happened if this had been a credit card account. They said that falls under different regulations, but that they probably still wouldn't have pursued the dispute. That kind of suggests to me that they're lazy or there's an undisclosed conflict of interest with the merchant.
So, I'm just trying to cut through the mess and figure out where the truth of the regulations lie. I've filed maybe a half-dozen disputes on various card accounts over the past 20 years, and this is the first one which I can recall that was not investigated. I'm not looking for ways to argue with the bank, but rather understand the limitations of consumer protections while using a debit card account vs credit card account.
Thanks,
JKG