Maybe the best thing is just ask each controller that gives you an instruction like that and say "do you want me to end up on a 4-mile final or do you want me to end up on 1/2 mile final and fly a 4-mile long base leg?"
Yup. This.
They’ll figure out better ways to ask for it if enough pilots are confused by ambiguous stuff.
The good ones around here do the “are you familiar with [landmark]?” thing.
If they get an “Affirmative” back or recognize voices and tail numbers they’ll say, “Report over [landmark] FOR a four mile left base, runway Y”.
For us, “the power lines” is a commonly used one, they’re on the ridge line south of the airport. Massive high tension lines and wires. Easy to spot.
“Your traffic is over the power lines on a straight in for runway 35R, do you have them in sight?”
Others are “Parker Road”, “Lincoln Avenue”, Arapahoe Road, etc.... all major roads and easy to see and plunk yourself right over the top of them. But non-locals don’t know them.
Then it changes to larger landmarks... “The large reservoir north of the airport” ... “Your traffic is over the shoreline of Cherry Creek Reservoir, you’re number two behind that traffic.”
The only thing I RARELY see controllers do is use the landmarks pointed out with flags by the VFR charts. The so called “VFR reporting points”
*I* have used them when navigating to a new airport to me or if a controller is trying to help me find something local I don’t know about, “I can see the X landmark (whatever the chart calls it), would that work for you?” And that works VERY well.
But I can only think of one time a controller used a landmark that was marked and named on the chart. That one was the 1500’ multiple radio towers just a few miles off of their runway on a hill.
“Do you see the radio towers at eleven to twelve o’clock? Make your base inside those towers for runway X.” Worked FABULOUS that that airport I had never been to.
Same thing with various other things, the “checkerboard water tower”, stuff like that. All those big visibility things work great.
But it’s quite rare to hear the VFR reporting points used. I don’t know why. I doubt controllers look much at VFR charts if they aren’t pilots, but I don’t know for sure.