Does being a Cirrus pilot make you a jerk in the Grumman too?As a Cirrus pilot, I just wanted to state that this is all true.
When you get rid of the cirrus, does your flying improve?
When they repack the chute, do they let you keep the old rocket?
Does being a Cirrus pilot make you a jerk in the Grumman too?As a Cirrus pilot, I just wanted to state that this is all true.
capability is not ability.
All the better to catch fire.FYI, I was sitting in an airport restaurant yesterday. Watched 2 Cirrus and one old Bonanza taxi out. Both Cirrus had quite a bit of power on and had to be riding the brakes. The Bonanza had the engine back at idle.
I understand the Cirrus does not have a steerable nose wheel but why ride the brakes soo hard going straight?
FYI, I was sitting in an airport restaurant yesterday. Watched 2 Cirrus and one old Bonanza taxi out. Both Cirrus had quite a bit of power on and had to be riding the brakes. The Bonanza had the engine back at idle.
I understand the Cirrus does not have a steerable nose wheel but why ride the brakes soo hard going straight?
Maybe I've been flying long enough but I generally tend to know when an airplane is quite a bit over idle power. If they are quite a bit over idle power they are probably using quite a bit tmore than necessary to taxi. It's not really that hard to determine. especially with your standard Continental or Lycoming power plant.How can you possibly know that? Cirrus recommends taxiing at 1,000 rpm for a variety of reasons. Cirrus brakes burn up easily, so I doubt they were taxing at high power with brakes on.
Maybe I've been flying long enough but I generally tend to know when an airplane is quite a bit over idle power. If they are quite a bit over idle power they are probably using quite a bit tmore than necessary to taxi. It's not really that hard to determine. especially with your standard Continental or Lycoming power plant.
Maybe I've been flying long enough but I generally tend to know when an airplane is quite a bit over idle power. If they are quite a bit over idle power they are probably using quite a bit tmore than necessary to taxi. It's not really that hard to determine. especially with your standard Continental or Lycoming power plant.
FYI, I was sitting in an airport restaurant yesterday.
I still call bs, sitting in an airplane...
I still call bs, sitting in an airplane there is no way someone can hear another plane's engine unless it's an f-15. Outside it's still hard to tell. Cirrus recommends 1,000 rpm for idle and taxi, with short small increases power to get started if needed. Even 1,000 rpm can get you cooking rolling downwind, around 20 to 25 knots, so jabs on the brakes or pulling back to 700 rpm is sometimes needed. "Quite a bit" over idle will require constant braking which will smoke the Cirrus brakes pretty quickly. Perception and reality are usually very different.
I was sitting in an airport restaurant yesterday
![]()
I'm not saying I can hear a plane and say, "that engine is turning at 1271.4 RPM, but I can tell the difference between an engine at 1000RPM and 1200RPM if heard over a very short span. I think most of us can listen to 1000 and then a couple minutes later hear 1200 and say the second one was turning faster.
FYI, I was sitting in an airport restaurant yesterday. Watched 2 Cirrus and one old Bonanza taxi out. Both Cirrus had quite a bit of power on and had to be riding the brakes. The Bonanza had the engine back at idle.
I understand the Cirrus does not have a steerable nose wheel but why ride the brakes soo hard going straight?
I still call bs, sitting in an airplane there is no way someone can hear another plane's engine unless it's an f-15. Outside it's still hard to tell. Cirrus recommends 1,000 rpm for idle and taxi, with short small increases power to get started if needed. Even 1,000 rpm can get you cooking rolling downwind, around 20 to 25 knots, so jabs on the brakes or pulling back to 700 rpm is sometimes needed. "Quite a bit" over idle will require constant braking which will smoke the Cirrus brakes pretty quickly. Perception and reality are usually very different.
My prior two planes - Grumman Tiger and SR22 - and now my Sky Arrow, all have free-castering nosewheels. In none did I, nor do I now spend much attention on taxi rpm - just whatever it takes. In none did I ever have excessive brake wear or brake fires. A few random thoughts…
1) It’s important to only use brakes for steering only after full rudder deflection is shown to be insufficient. It’s common to see pilots use brakes to steer long before they have applied full rudder in the desired direction.
2) Taxiing too fast isn’t good. But taxiing fast enough to get good rudder steering can preclude all or almost all of the need for brakes to steer. Paradoxically, taxiing too slowly can require more brakes to steer.
3) Runways and taxiways are crowned. If they’re wide enough, taxiing to the right or left of the centerline can help the plane “pull” in that direction, decreasing or eliminating the need for brakes at all in a crosswind.
None of this is rocket science, but apparently a lot of pilots don’t use all the techniques that make taxiing easier.