A "black hole" of a huge lake if they were relying at all on ground lighting, as well.Ugh. God bless. My instructor always talked about the choice in a single. Night or IFR but never both. Tossing a new plane in the mix. Sounds like some hostile terrain as well

Remember doing just that a few years ago. Coming back from Alabama hit convective storms. Could pick through them. But picking kept getting tougher. Put er down, tomorrow is another day. But get-there-itis is a thing. I've suffered it myself. It really takes discipline and need to set your own personal minimums.Speaking of that, it comes down to discipline. The ‘big money’ is made with preflight weather checks. The shorter the time is, the more accurate the weather. One can start with current observations, then go to forecasts.
One of my main safety tools is the inflight divert, especially on a cross-country flight. We need to realize & accept, we never have to be ANYWHERE. The family & friends would much rather hear about a delay than get ready to plan a funeral. It actually can come down to that.
Yes I’ve done a few things early on, not to be repeated. The learning curve can be so steep, one has to learn from others. The next times things get tight, land short.
Wisdom comes with age, usually, and age comes with some hard lessons. If we survive our youthful stupidity, we get wiser. Then the young guys laugh at us old, conservative folks who are a lot more careful when they fly. They don't want to hear the stories about our learning experiences. Too many of them have to make the mistakes themselves. I have stories about them, too. Too many stories.But get-there-itis is a thing. I've suffered it myself. It really takes discipline and need to set your own personal minimums.
Not nearly as bad as most of Canada. There are a lot of logging clearcuts in that area; with any luck, they came down in one of them.That is some super remote terrain.
Not nearly as bad as most of Canada. There are a lot of logging clearcuts in that area; with any luck, they came down in one of them.
Maybe. But I think Wyoming has some similarly remote areas, but not heavily forested, which should make searches easier.A few years ago I road a motorcycle from sault saint marie to Timmons past Ranger Lake. 50 mile gravel road in that area, signs saying “no gas for 100 km”, etc. Seemed more remote than anywhere in the lower 48.
You don't. You crash in it, maybe CFIT. Only problem is the stumps everywhere that tear an airplane apart. The clearcut can make finding it easier, as long as it isn't ten years old and infested with tall brush.But at night, with snow falling at some intensity, how does one maneuver into that clear cut?
This adds yet another twist to the story. The plane was found and two of the four casualties were fleeing from murder and conspiracy charges.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-murder-conspiracy?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
Bad karma.
Whoops. Apologies. But it sure made for an interesting read!Nice try. Not the same aircraft. Sioux Lookout is over 1,100 kilometers from Ranger Lake. There were two on board the missing plane near Ranger Lake, four bodies were found in the aircraft near Sioux Lookout.
It was snowing when it disappeared and was likely covered in snow during the initial search. After a few weeks of spring the snow would melt and expose the airplane.