None of these planes do it for me like the 337.
I don't really want a float plane.Would this one do it for you..??
![]()
I don't really want a float plane.![]()
Understandable. Looks like you already have the ultimate "float kit" in your avatar pic.
But if you think a helicopter is a mechanical contraption, just wait till you get a 337.![]()
I don't really want a float plane.![]()
Fuel burn....only 250 gal/hr.Would this one do it for you..??
![]()
Fuel burn....only 250 gal/hr.
Edit: double that. I just noticed 12 engines!
Fuel burn....only 250 gal/hr.
Edit: double that. I just noticed 12 engines!
The original air-cooled radial engine powered version had 4-bladed pusher props. It went to a 2-blade pusher when the Curtis V-12 water-cooled engines were installed. But I've never read anything on why. Perhaps the Curtis were powerful enough in total there was no need for a 4-blade on the rear engines???That's odd.
Would this one do it for you..??
![]()
Another view of the Dornier
![]()
Another view of the Dornier
![]()
