Yes, that's what I meant. For some reason I had always assumed that the percentage of sky coverage that defines overcast, broken, etc. referred to percentage of the entire sky that's visible from the airport, but your explanation makes sense. It's just that this is the first time I've seen a report like that.do you mean that portions of the reporting area are broken and 900 and others are overcast at 900?
It don't work like that. FEW, SCT, BKN and OVC are based on the % of coverage of the entire horizon. I'm sure that's just a boo boo.Yes, that's what I meant. For some reason I had always assumed that the percentage of sky coverage that defines overcast, broken, etc. referred to percentage of the entire sky that's visible from the airport, but your explanation makes sense. It's just that this is the first time I've seen a report like that.
Ah, chicaboog noon-eeg Solo. Tah keeng sa leeng ah pak mugglah, peeska chatah: may now kung bantha poodoo!