Let some other country foot the bill for a billion dollar stadium that will be useless after the Olympics.
As an aside, they're not all useless after the Olympics are over. The Atlanta Braves have been playing in the '96 Olympic Stadium for nearly 20 years now.
I'm not disagreeing in general, but Boston doesn't need any new stadiums
Go ahead, just try to claim that Fenway needs to be replaced, I dare you.
It's 103 years old, time for a new one.
Let some other country foot the bill for a billion dollar stadium that will be useless after the Olympics.
The taxpayers in Colorado voted not to fund the 1976 Winter Olympics after they had already been awarded. That was a good decision made better because the committee had overstated many things in the proposal.Just one more example that no one really gives a crap about the environment, (or the tax payer for that matter)
It's amazing what the infrastructure for the Olympics costs. The networks should foot the bill.
I can't see any reason that a city would want the Olympics. Cost, disruption, security, etc. The so-called "economic development" rarely if ever covers the cost to the city and it's residents.
The taxpayers in Colorado voted not to fund the 1976 Winter Olympics after they had already been awarded. That was a good decision made better because the committee had overstated many things in the proposal.
Does anyone recall if the olympics of the olden days (say pre- and just post WW2) had the big push for building new structures that today's events appear to create?
Yes, all the "Modern Olympics" have been major production affairs to serve as demonstration, showcases of economic and industrial strength. The 36 Olympics ushered in the age of Television even.
For my knowledge, define "modern olympics"
1894 on.
So, since the 1896 Olympics were held in Athens, and based on the various lines of thinking in this thread, we may have discovered the original reason for Greece curren financial troubles. They are still trying to pay for 120 year old infrastructure improvements.
Pretty sure it would get voted down again. I think people would be opposed to the congestion and disruption it would bring, let alone the economic issue. Everyone knows there are winter sports in Colorado. It's not as if it needs promotion.Wonder what would happen if they voted on it today.
I can't see any reason that a city would want the Olympics. Cost, disruption, security, etc. The so-called "economic development" rarely if ever covers the cost to the city and it's residents.
It's all about graft and corruption, he who can steal the most wins! It's the Olympic and FIFA way!