And to be fair, I didn't even realize there was an attached story, only the legal opinion you put forward. Only the title specifically says there is. Most people probably thought they were the same thing with two links, so you might want to change your original post if you want comments on the story as well as the legal opinion. As far as your question about "why pilots need a voice at the table at federally funded airports", if you have to ask that, then there is something wrong to begin with. On the slight other hand though, having managed airports for the past almost 8 years, what pilots want is not always realistic at an airport either. Many pilots don't know much about governmental budgets, grant assurances, and what can and cannot actually be done at an airport (or why). Nevertheless, I think it's always better to have more aviation knowledge rather than less.