Richard
Final Approach
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2005
- Messages
- 9,076
- Location
- West Coast Resistance
- Display Name
Display name:
Ack...city life
(I think it is premature to post this because I dislike saying what I will do. I'd much rather say what I am doing. I'm still in the formative stage of my plan, therefore this post is premature. But in order to aid me in determining the type plane and what kind of panel I feel I need to spill it, as it were.)
Previously I had sought advice on avenues for transitioning into a flying career, aka, being paid to fly. After much research and careful consideration my very supportive & loving wife and I have decided I will spend up to 13 months making personal flights to build my time. Included in this time period will be my attainment of my CFII and other dual instruction flights as they become necessary. This will become my full time occupation, hence I will quit my current business to concentrate solely and completely on this aviation plan.
The time period will commence within one or two months after I finish up some things currently in progress. The immediate goal is a pilot position in high performance multi eingine aircraft. The 3 year goal is Part 135 capt in mutliengine turbine or jet.
I've sold the Stinson so I can direct my attention towards an IFR capable single engine time builder. I have two friends who both own light twins and they have agreed I will be able to fly their aircraft for direct operating expenses only. I will provide my own ins and after ins required checkout I will be able to make solo flights in their a/c.
My chief concern at this time is identifying the 'most correct' aircraft for my intended purpose. Minimum requirements of such aircraft are:
--IFR panel. One VOR/GS is unacceptable. I read the links provided by Bruce Cameron and while I agree with such minimalist views I think I require more because my goal is also to develop the competency with advanced instruments the 135 operators want to see.
--Less than 10 gph. This is a starting point. It makes fiscal sense to minimize costs during this time period. I'd like complex/HP but do not believe those features are required for my plan. Besides, going fast is contrary to building time. My friend's twins could fill in for the complex and HP.
--Minimal purchase price. Speaks for itself. However, I belong to the, "buy a cheap tool you buy it twice" school. I have no problem paying for value but I have to answer the question is it a need or a want. That's where y'all come in with your knowledge and wonderful advice.
--Ease of Mx. Again, fiscal sense, but I don't want significant down time and/or multiple or recurrent ADs. I also want to be A&P friendly.
--KI not required, RG not required.
So there you have it. I really need to hear what y'all have to say because you would be helping me to define my plan. Please do not disqualify yourself because you are uncertain you have anything of value to say, have minimal experience, or that you may think you would look foolish in saying.
One way or the other, I will remain on my time schedule. Please accept my invitation to come along.
Previously I had sought advice on avenues for transitioning into a flying career, aka, being paid to fly. After much research and careful consideration my very supportive & loving wife and I have decided I will spend up to 13 months making personal flights to build my time. Included in this time period will be my attainment of my CFII and other dual instruction flights as they become necessary. This will become my full time occupation, hence I will quit my current business to concentrate solely and completely on this aviation plan.
The time period will commence within one or two months after I finish up some things currently in progress. The immediate goal is a pilot position in high performance multi eingine aircraft. The 3 year goal is Part 135 capt in mutliengine turbine or jet.
I've sold the Stinson so I can direct my attention towards an IFR capable single engine time builder. I have two friends who both own light twins and they have agreed I will be able to fly their aircraft for direct operating expenses only. I will provide my own ins and after ins required checkout I will be able to make solo flights in their a/c.
My chief concern at this time is identifying the 'most correct' aircraft for my intended purpose. Minimum requirements of such aircraft are:
--IFR panel. One VOR/GS is unacceptable. I read the links provided by Bruce Cameron and while I agree with such minimalist views I think I require more because my goal is also to develop the competency with advanced instruments the 135 operators want to see.
--Less than 10 gph. This is a starting point. It makes fiscal sense to minimize costs during this time period. I'd like complex/HP but do not believe those features are required for my plan. Besides, going fast is contrary to building time. My friend's twins could fill in for the complex and HP.
--Minimal purchase price. Speaks for itself. However, I belong to the, "buy a cheap tool you buy it twice" school. I have no problem paying for value but I have to answer the question is it a need or a want. That's where y'all come in with your knowledge and wonderful advice.
--Ease of Mx. Again, fiscal sense, but I don't want significant down time and/or multiple or recurrent ADs. I also want to be A&P friendly.
--KI not required, RG not required.
So there you have it. I really need to hear what y'all have to say because you would be helping me to define my plan. Please do not disqualify yourself because you are uncertain you have anything of value to say, have minimal experience, or that you may think you would look foolish in saying.
One way or the other, I will remain on my time schedule. Please accept my invitation to come along.
Last edited: