Mooney M20 Beverly, MA

Live ATC has him reporting engine issues 1 minute after getting take off clearance. Seems like he tried to come back
 
Considering Mooney's wet wing design and the amount of wing damage, it's absolutely amazing there was no fire in this crash.
 
Feels a bit surreal. I read this post yesterday morning and thought “wow that’s pretty close to home” as I used to fly out of KBVY. Turns out this was a family friend of mine. Very good guy and an amazing family who are now devastated. Little did I know…

Rest In Peace and forever sunny skies.
 
Someone pointed out it rained a lot prior to this flight. I’d ask how long was he there, at least overnight it seems. Was he parked outside? How did the sumping go?

I thought he reported ‘engine problems’ soon after takeoff?

I was parked outside at Vero Beach a few years ago, heavy rains. I did careful sumping, got some droplets, wiggled the wings, slumped again. At my fuel stop up North I carefully stumped again.

Right or wrong I’ve been known to vary my sumping. In the hangar, no change in fuel load, more cursory check. When parked outside, especially after heavy rains, much more involved. BWTHDIK.
 
I was parked outside at Vero Beach a few years ago, heavy rains. I did careful sumping, got some droplets, wiggled the wings, slumped again. At my fuel stop up North I carefully stumped again.
Good points, and good discovery.

The model Mooney in this accident appears to be a standard Mooney with flush fuel caps. They will allow rain water to enter when the fuel cap gaskets are breached.

If significantly more than just a few drops are discovered, regardless of how much the wings are rocked during the preflight rock, drain, and inspect the sump routine, if there's water detected and drained off, more water (lesser amounts) work down to the sumps after the next flight or two (or three).
 
Or obvious spilled fuel.
Yep, they stood by with the 3" hose but it doesn't appear there was anything to wash down (nor concerned enough that you left someone on the nozzle).
 
I don't have access to the detailed longer-term flight history of this plane, but from what I could research, it is possible it had not flown since early April (and given the gap in flights, and a similar time gap in the past, I wonder whether it had just come out of annual). I also noted the lack of the apparent fuel spill or fire at the accident site.
 
Good points, and good discovery.

The model Mooney in this accident appears to be a standard Mooney with flush fuel caps. They will allow rain water to enter when the fuel cap gaskets are breached.

If significantly more than just a few drops are discovered, regardless of how much the wings are rocked during the preflight rock, drain, and inspect the sump routine, if there's water detected and drained off, more water (lesser amounts) work down to the sumps after the next flight or two (or three).
This happened to me a few years back:

Thread 'And that why we preflight, folks'
https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/community/threads/and-that-why-we-preflight-folks.123377/
 
Yeah, most of the plane is on pavement, wings looked breached. I don’t see any fuel stain on the ground? Flight aware doesn’t show any flights the prior 14 days, didn’t log in to look longer.

Many ‘engine problems’ are traced to fuel. If it was fuel issues, the prelim should state if it’s obvious early on. Hard to imagine taking off with checking the fuel ahead of time.
 
I know Geoffrey. I met him when he came to me to get his initial tailwheel endorsement, and we flew in a Cub, and had a ball with it. He was extremely intelligent, could out-explain about anyone on the physics and aerodynamics of what we were doing. He was on whole meticulous and thorough. He lived life full throttle, traveled the world extensively, wore a bow tie at almost all times, met and married a beautiful woman named Gentry, brought her to our big annual Christmas parties, had a promising future in aerospace, and they had a baby girl on the way. His widow now has 3 months to prepare for her daughter's birth without him. I am...very sad. He was a really neat guy and the world is a lesser place without him in it.
 
I know Geoffrey. I met him when he came to me to get his initial tailwheel endorsement, and we flew in a Cub, and had a ball with it. He was extremely intelligent, could out-explain about anyone on the physics and aerodynamics of what we were doing. He was on whole meticulous and thorough. He lived life full throttle, traveled the world extensively, wore a bow tie at almost all times, met and married a beautiful woman named Gentry, brought her to our big annual Christmas parties, had a promising future in aerospace, and they had a baby girl on the way. His widow now has 3 months to prepare for her daughter's birth without him. I am...very sad. He was a really neat guy and the world is a lesser place without him in it.
That is a tough read
 
Flightoftwo…. Sorry for your loss. Very sad situation for the family. RIP.
 
I know Geoffrey. I met him when he came to me to get his initial tailwheel endorsement, and we flew in a Cub, and had a ball with it. He was extremely intelligent, could out-explain about anyone on the physics and aerodynamics of what we were doing. He was on whole meticulous and thorough. He lived life full throttle, traveled the world extensively, wore a bow tie at almost all times, met and married a beautiful woman named Gentry, brought her to our big annual Christmas parties, had a promising future in aerospace, and they had a baby girl on the way. His widow now has 3 months to prepare for her daughter's birth without him. I am...very sad. He was a really neat guy and the world is a lesser place without him in it.
Very much so. I didn’t quite want to go into all the details, but I knew him and his family from high school forward. He very much lived life to the fullest. We were both pursuing PhDs in aerospace engineering at the same time and had some good conversations during the holidays when everyone was back in town. With his passion and wit, he reminded me so much of his father, which is one the highest compliments I could give. We lost a good one this time.
 
Someone pointed out it rained a lot prior to this flight. I’d ask how long was he there, at least overnight it seems. Was he parked outside? How did the sumping go?

I thought he reported ‘engine problems’ soon after takeoff?

I was parked outside at Vero Beach a few years ago, heavy rains. I did careful sumping, got some droplets, wiggled the wings, slumped again. At my fuel stop up North I carefully stumped again.

Right or wrong I’ve been known to vary my sumping. In the hangar, no change in fuel load, more cursory check. When parked outside, especially after heavy rains, much more involved. BWTHDIK.
Yeah, had a flight-school 150 engine stop just after takeoff. 6K runway, no worries, but the long taxi got the water into the wrong place. We drained out a pint or so.
When I got my own plane I became vigilant about sumping, after refueling, or rain (until we got a hangar.)
 
I know Geoffrey. I met him when he came to me to get his initial tailwheel endorsement, and we flew in a Cub, and had a ball with it. He was extremely intelligent, could out-explain about anyone on the physics and aerodynamics of what we were doing. He was on whole meticulous and thorough. He lived life full throttle, traveled the world extensively, wore a bow tie at almost all times, met and married a beautiful woman named Gentry, brought her to our big annual Christmas parties, had a promising future in aerospace, and they had a baby girl on the way. His widow now has 3 months to prepare for her daughter's birth without him. I am...very sad. He was a really neat guy and the world is a lesser place without him in it.
I concur with one of the earlier posters. Any accident like this is tragic, but often unseen are the effects that will impact others (unknown to you or me) forever. Very sad.
 
Hit hard for a Mooney. Stall?
I don't think the plane got too high (200' AGL?) before having to make a forced landing and the only option generally straight ahead was an industrial park. Even if he tried to "fly through the crash" (and the plane did appear to end up wings level), there were ground a lot of ground obstacles to cause significant damage.
 
I’m not saying this is indeed the cause here, but why isn’t it more common to use covers on fuel caps while plane is outside?

Something like this
 
I’m not saying this is indeed the cause here, but why isn’t it more common to use covers on fuel caps while plane is outside?

Something like this

first question that I have: how does the fuel cap cover effect tank venting when the pilot forgets to take the cover off?
 
first question that I have: how does the fuel cap cover effect tank venting when the pilot forgets to take the cover off?
The vents are under the wing, so I don't imagine these would affect that.

This is the first time I've ever seen a peel-and-stick cover for fuel caps. TBH, I could've used these during a couple different months I've had to park my M20C on ramps instead of in a hangar.
 
The vents are under the wing, so I don't imagine these would affect that.

This is the first time I've ever seen a peel-and-stick cover for fuel caps. TBH, I could've used these during a couple different months I've had to park my M20C on ramps instead of in a hangar.

I use it. The peel isn’t the best quality, sticks to the plane sometimes and then you have to melt it off. But def worth the peace of mind
 
I’m not saying this is indeed the cause here, but why isn’t it more common to use covers on fuel caps while plane is outside?

Something like this
I’ll be honest, I’ve been around awhile and I didn’t know these were even out there…
 
first question that I have: how does the fuel cap cover effect tank venting when the pilot forgets to take the cover off?
The Mooney fuel caps are not vented, so there shouldn't be any difference. Also, both fuel caps are visible to the pilot while looking out the side windows. It may be necessary to lean to the right a little to view the right side cap.

Servicing the caps with new seals during each annual seems to do the trick. But mine resides in a hangar 325+ days per year. If a Mooney sits outside most of the year in a sunny hot climate, IMO checking the caps for leaks more often than once per year would be a good idea. And of course, sampling the tanks after aggressive wing rocking after sitting out in the rain.
 
Someone pointed out it rained a lot prior to this flight. I’d ask how long was he there, at least overnight it seems. Was he parked outside? How did the sumping go?

I thought he reported ‘engine problems’ soon after takeoff?

I was parked outside at Vero Beach a few years ago, heavy rains. I did careful sumping, got some droplets, wiggled the wings, slumped again. At my fuel stop up North I carefully stumped again.

Right or wrong I’ve been known to vary my sumping. In the hangar, no change in fuel load, more cursory check. When parked outside, especially after heavy rains, much more involved. BWTHDIK.

A long time ago, I parked my airplane, asked the FBO to refuel it, and went on my way. When I came back the next day, the fuel cap was still sitting on the wing. These things happen. Fortunately, I was in the middle of the desert, and it hadn’t rained a drop—so all I had to do was make sure nothing had crawled in and died in the tank.
 
The Mooney fuel caps are not vented, so there shouldn't be any difference.

I was thinking that would be the case, but didn't know.

Also, both fuel caps are visible to the pilot while looking out the side windows. It may be necessary to lean to the right a little to view the right side cap.

The next time someone takes off without properly securing the fuel caps won't be the first time and won't be the last time. :-/
 
The next time someone takes off without properly securing the fuel caps won't be the first time and won't be the last time. :-/
For sure...

At least in a Mooney, when the fuel gauges start trending downwards too early, you can look out the windows and watch the fuel run down the wings! Unlike a high wing...
 
For sure...

At least in a Mooney, when the fuel gauges start trending downwards too early, you can look out the windows and watch the fuel run down the wings! Unlike a high wing...
This is of the checls I was taught when transitioning to the Mooney. After verifying gear up and flaps up, look at each gas cap for leakage or siphoning.
 
It's always sad to read about the lives lost.

Those that perish in aircraft accidents are real people, with goals, skills, and interests. The void left by the sudden death of those that meant so much to the survivors is vast and painful.
 
Servicing the caps with new seals during each annual seems to do the trick. But mine resides in a hangar 325+ days per year. If a Mooney sits outside most of the year in a sunny hot climate, IMO checking the caps for leaks more often than once per year would be a good idea. And of course, sampling the tanks after aggressive wing rocking after sitting out in the rain.

The blue flourosilicon o rings don't need to be replaced every year.

But there have been several reports where the o-rings were replaced, but only the large outer one. There is a small one inside around the shaft that seems to get missed. One reason to have annuals done by someone who KNOWS that make/model
 
Final report for N9573M

The pilot and the passenger were attempting to take off when surveillance video captured, and a witness heard, the sound of the airplane’s engine backfiring followed by a sudden decrease and increase in engine power. Dark smoke was also seen trailing under the belly of the airplane. Data downloaded from the airplane’s onboard engine monitor recorded an rpm drop from 2,600 to 1,500 rpm then back to 2,500 rpm shortly after the airplane became airborne. Fuel flow, manifold pressure, and horsepower readings uniformly tracked with the decrease/increase of rpm, consistent with the pilot quickly reducing the throttle to idle then back to full power.

Postaccident examination of the engine revealed the No. 2 cylinder bottom spark plug was loose, and stains/residue from combustion exhaust gas leakage was visible around the spark plug port consistent that it had been loose prior to the accident. Review of the airplane’s engine maintenance logbook revealed that the spark plugs were, “cleaned, gapped, tested, and rotated” at the last annual inspection, about 37 hours before the accident.

Based on the available information, it is most likely that the backfiring heard coming from the engine was due to the loose No. 2 cylinder spark plug, which was not properly torqued at the last annual inspection. Despite the fact that the engine was still producing close to full power following the backfire, the pilot entered a steep turn, likely in an attempt to return to the airport, after which the airplane most likely stalled from an altitude that was too low to recover.

NTSB probable cause: The pilot’s failure to maintain control of the airplane while maneuvering to return to the airport which resulted in an aerodynamic stall. Contributing to the accident was the improperly installed No. 2 cylinder bottom spark plug by maintenance personnel, which came loose and resulted in an engine backfire on takeoff.
 
Another highly preventable one... so sad.

I like being able to thoroughly inspect the engine during my pre-flight. Tough to do on aircraft that only have an oil filler door.
 
Why would a loose plug cause dark smoke?
Did pilot pull power back then increase power? Mooney’s are tough but you can’t spin stall them.
 
Back
Top