Let'sgoflying!
Touchdown! Greaser!
saw a news flash about it
surely there are restrictions
surely there are restrictions
“No. All Lycoming engines are still required to be overhauled within twelve calendar years of entering service or last overhaul, regardless of operating hours. The 2600 hour extension applies to operating hours only. Both limits apply and whichever is reached first determines when your overhaul is due.”It matters if the aircraft is used in Part 135.
They can't keep up as it is. They'll probably charge more on the front and back end claiming longer tbo and still have a 2 year backlog.Interesting. They're sacrificing some frequency of overhaul/rebuild work hoping to make it up and then some with share shifting from continental. Or they just didn't think about it and some snappy new marketing guy thought this would be a great one time bump in sales and he'll be gone to his next job before any negative ramifications pop up.
Laughs in part 91“No. All Lycoming engines are still required to be overhauled within twelve calendar years "
If the change had some sort of MTBF data behind it, sure, I'd prefer honesty to regulatory capture gamesmanship.We might complain about it but it’s a move in the right direction, no?
(you’d rather read that they reduced all TBOs to 800 hours??)
New and remanufactured engines are full of brand-new parts. Sometimes the case is the only used part. New stuff has a far better chance of lasting a long time than older parts, even though the old stuff is NDI'd. Lycoming never reuses cylinders and pistons or mags or cams and lifters. I don't think they reuse carbs, either.Applies to new and factory rebuilt engines only. Not sure why it matters anyways. There's not a guarantee it will last that long, just a piece of paper.
They don't use the term remanufactured. They call it "rebuilt." From their website:I didn't think Lycoming did "remanufactured" any more.

